You've just illustrated my entire point right here. You say that you weren't laughing at Jackson being a house-******, but you were laughing at him being a house-******. I guess you don't realize that that's a clear contradiction. You're not black right? Here's my thing, this is obviously a movie that exploits slavery. That's all I'm saying. I don't have to see the movie to recognize that. If Django was a factual documentary where white people are really being open and honest about slavery/white supremacy, how slavery/white supremacy has shaped this country, how white racism has changed in form over time, and how it effects people living in Amerikkka today then I'd doubt that you'd laugh watching it. Slavery is one of the worst atrocities in the history of man. You would have cringed and felt uncomfortable had you watched a movie that was just made to show the real about slavery. Django is a movie made by white people to entertain other white people using slavery as the back drop. That's the definition of exploitation.
Look, everything that you all are saying about the movie may be true. It could be a very entertaining movie that makes Jamie Foxx's character look like some black-superhero who gets to kill a bunch of whites or whatever you all are saying. This does not mean that it's not a movie that exploits slavery, because it is. Again, you have to be careful with white people because they're very slick. There's a reason that Hollywood is behind this movie so tough.