Btw we need that horse stuntin Jamie did at the end of the movie as a gif. I'm on the coli too much when this kinda shyt is running through my mind during the movie 
Anyone Seen Django?
- Thread starter Pool_Shark
- Start date
-
- Tags
- movies
Did anyone get to witness an awkward staredown moment between blacks and cacs before entering this movie like
///
lol
///lol
Real shyt. SMH @ me seeing Django put his glasses on at the end and looking at the house and thinking "Damn, that would make a great avi"Btw we need that horse stuntin Jamie did at the end of the movie as a gif. I'm on the coli too much when this kinda shyt is running through my mind during the movie
As for the movie itself, I think it could be Tarantino's best ever. He did a great job of handling the seriousness of slavery and all that came with it. He used humor in the right places and in the right ways too.
And fukk Spike's opinion of a movie he's never seen. I'm absolutely interested in Aaron Mcgruder's opinion of the movie though.
Jone2three45
Supporter
As long as people don't forget what happen to our ancestors during slavery and do not take it lightly or jokingly or a mockery, I could care less what one should think about this film.
1. The use of the word "******". I read before watching that the word was used a lot in the movie. It was and that's not what was offensive/too much. What was offensive was the word being used as bait for laughs. For example, QT having one character say something to the effect of "No, not Hercules, ******cles!"....
2. The graphic, amistad-like scenes. If you're going to put graphic, Amistad-like imagery in your movie, the principal message of your movie should be about the sobering, brutal nature of slavery. There are a few moments where it seems like QT's fishing for laughs when the reality of the situation just isn't funny.
Example: White guy on horseback chasing 3 black dudes off into the field for comedic relief in a scene.
3. Sam Jackson's character...possibly the GOAT film c00n and voice for some of the most questionable lines. I don't know if it's worse if QT wrote them or Sam Jackson improvised them.
On another level, why is Sam Jackson the last "villain" to die in the movie? QT spends more time on his sendoff than Candie's.
4. The entire dinner scene @ Candie land.... An entire book could be written deconstructing Candie's speech.
Racial critiques aside, the movie was just poorly paced and fell off in the last half. Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs, and Inglorious Basterds are still my top 3 QT flicks.
It sounds like you walked into the theater looking to be offended and got what you paid for.
Saw it at the Bowie Reagal theatre...It was packed and even more packed for the next showing. Crowd reaction was great, everybody was laughing and loved the movie. Good movie imo opinon, I didnt expect to laugh so much.
What I thought that was the best song. That shyt was banging in the theatre...I never heard the song before watching the movie and it was a pleasant surprise, me and my brother were both like:
That John Legend song was crack too.
That klan scene and the argument about the hoods was one of the funniest scenes in movie history
"I can't see shyt in this thing"
Breh me and my bros were
during that whole scene. The movie aint even a comedy yet it was funnier than alot of comedies. That scene and Samuel Jackson's c00nery were 
...This movie is AMAZINGI thought the same during the movie.
That would be my ONLY con about the movie is that it never felt "serious" to me but its a Quentin Tarantino flick, kinda to be expected
yup they show it all
Yea a nikka in the audience had yelled out "Ahh come on man"
I didnt really notice it though
Ethnic Vagina Finder
The Great Paper Chaser
I thought the plot was serious... the think the best aspect of the movie was that it didn't take itself too seriously. There were a lot of tense sense moments that I though came off well. I think QT approached it well. You can't use nikka in a movie that many times and expect the movie to be serious all the way through.
Thanks for sharing. I was like :jadawtf: during that entire scene wondering
the blood came from?I thought the plot was serious... the think the best aspect of the movie was that it didn't take itself too seriously. There were a lot of tense sense moments that I though came off well. I think QT approached it well. You can't use nikka in a movie that many times and expect the movie to be serious all the way through.
Yea you right about the ****** part, whenever the word was said ppl just laughed.
I really didnt know much about the movie going into it to be honest (never really saw a commercial cause I dont watch tv and Im not a huge movie buff, in fact this the first movie Ive seen in theatres since watching the Hangover 2
) which is why I assumed it would be alot more "serious" then I expected but that takes nothing away from the movie to me, it was a GREAT movie and I'll def be watching it again.
1. The use of the word "******". I read before watching that the word was used a lot in the movie. It was and that's not what was offensive/too much. What was offensive was the word being used as bait for laughs. For example, QT having one character say something to the effect of "No, not Hercules, ******cles!"...
Wasn't it Stephen who said that? If you got a problem with that, then you must not anything that comes out of Uncle Ruckus's mouth.
2. The graphic, amistad-like scenes. If you're going to put graphic, Amistad-like imagery in your movie, the principal message of your movie should be about the sobering, brutal nature of slavery. There are a few moments where it seems like QT's fishing for laughs when the reality of the situation just isn't funny.
Example: White guy on horseback chasing 3 black dudes off into the field for comedic relief in a scene.
If that's the scene I remember when they get to Candieland, I think people were laughing at what Stephen or Candie was saying, not at the 3 slaves running back into the field. I have to watch the movie again.
LOTS of spoilers in the following paragraph. I highly recommend those who haven't seen this movie to just skip it.
It was Stephen who made the biggest fuss about Django being treated like a white man on the arrival to Candieland. It was Stephen who discovered the plot to capture Brumhilda and inform Candie that he was being tricked. And it was Stephen who essentially captured Django and almost sent him back into slavery. So yeah, he's gets to be the last villain (Ain't no "" about it nikka, he was evil.) to die. He's also the last to die because he's the first (and only) negro Django had to kill. Plus everyone knew there was gonna be more fukkery with Stephen half-pleading and half-cussing Django out. shyt was hilarious.
4. The entire dinner scene @ Candie land...
If a whole book could be written surely you can sum up what was wrong with the speech in 3 sentences. And even if it is wrong, you gotta remember that it's 1860 and slavemasters probably had a deluded view on the cranial structure of the typical black man.
