I'm sorry, but anyone who claims science and religion can be reconciled is just a p*ssy.
Straight up.
It sounds mean, but lets be real.
"god" to you only exists in the margins of science books, where we haven't learned something.
Are you willing to call the MONUMENTAL discovery today about the propagation of gravitational waves at the start of the big bang, "god?"
No.
You're not.
Cause god is whatever we don't understand.
I would, actually. If God is omni-present and omnipotent it would have to be wouldn't it. And to my manz posting scriptures, i know why you posted that. But I don't think I was given a brain to just mate and build things. In the same way that I wouldn't stone a woman in the way Leviticus instructs me to, I'm not about the stoning life.
I don't condemn nor do I not understand your stance, I see HOW they could differ. What I don't see is WHY. If what we understand and know God to be then it would have to be a part or wholly these systems that govern our universe. We can argue up and down about who's right or wrong, but it gets us nowhere. To me God exists in the margins, in the texts and in the appendix of science books. God is everything we do AND don't understand. Call me a heretic or whatever, i just know i'm a human that was given the power of critical though and analysis so while I see why people question God, i have NO clue whatsoever why people argue against what has been empirically proven (i.e. gravity, evolution, the stars) Only an absolute FOOL would not believe in science. While ONLY faith can make you a theist.