Ann Coulter been reading The Coli. Exposes Black Lives Matter

MajorVitaman

Superstar
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Messages
6,483
Reputation
3,170
Daps
34,909
Reppin
#ByrdGang (formerly Eastcoastnaga)
If nobody took them seriously then people wouldn't be steady striving to get to their level. If you think about the parallel between white and black societies, the white elite keep the masses at bay by selling them the dream that one day, they can be just like them socially, even though its a lie.

If they have done nothing for black people, who has been responsible for the advancements of black people in America? What significant advancements do you think we as a people have made?

I think every society has an elite class, why expect different from black folks?

We have no "advancements". We're being set up for mass genocide and we're sitting here breaking our arm trying to pat ourselves on the back with nothing to show for it. Why can't you point out anything these "elites" have done in the last 50 years?
:stopitslime:
Just admit it breh, these hand picked bougie token negros aren't on our team.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,268
Reputation
7,105
Daps
109,537
Majority of black men are conservative... They just don't identify with the American right-wing.

Like what bubble are y'all living in where black men being conservative is strange to y'all?

Where do y'all get haircuts :mjpls:

Malcolm X was Conservative. MLK was Conservative. The Coli is on something totally different. Y'all seem right of the right. Some of you seem a little further out there than your average Black Conservative. Not entirely bad....because honestly id take a Coli-Conservative over a David Clarke Black Conservative. But some of the views on here(in TLR specifically) are more extreme than your regular right of center everyday Black man.

:mjpls:
Malcolm X was not Conservative.
MLK was not Conservative.
Conservatism is a two part ideal here in the West: economic liberalization, and social conservatism. Neither Malcolm not Michael was for either of them, and its not just their linkings to Labour Rights movements, Communist and Socialist organizations, leaders and countries, or their vehement anti-imperialism/anti-colonialism, they were both very clearly Left-wing.
And a good chunk of Black men may identify with some bullshyt composite of misogynistic, bootstrap nonsense, but that doesn't make them conservative.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,268
Reputation
7,105
Daps
109,537
We have no "advancements". We're being set up for mass genocide and we're sitting here breaking our arm trying to pat ourselves on the back with nothing to show for it. Why can't you point out anything these "elites" have done in the last 50 years?
:stopitslime:
Just admit it breh, these hand picked bougie token negros aren't on our team.
What exactly are you pushing for them to do?
Seize the means of production?
 

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
39,962
Reputation
5,538
Daps
159,149
Reppin
Dallas, TX
While an organizing collaborative group I'm apart of and BLM were outside the office of the Cleveland prosecutor who chose not to prosecute the officer responsible for the murder of Tamir Rice, all you dorks were busy online lusting after "PAWGs."
The same when we were in Washington after Michael Brown.
If I don't see you dorks in the field putting in work, y'all nikkas don't know shyt to me :yeshrug::mjlol:
1.Post pics of you walking with the people:ohhh:
2. I didn't realize Gabrielle Union was a pawg:mjlol:
 

ignorethis

RIP Fresh RIP Doe RIP Phat
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
8,127
Reputation
2,819
Daps
36,576
Malcolm X was not Conservative.
MLK was not Conservative.
Conservatism is a two part ideal here in the West: economic liberalization, and social conservatism. Neither Malcolm not Michael was for either of them, and its not just their linkings to Labour Rights movements, Communist and Socialist organizations, leaders and countries, or their vehement anti-imperialism/anti-colonialism, they were both very clearly Left-wing.
And a good chunk of Black men may identify with some bullshyt composite of misogynistic, bootstrap nonsense, but that doesn't make them conservative.
Majority black men are conservative, only somebody in a liberal college bubble would argue against this.

Barks like a dog, walks like a dog, but it's not a dog?
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
48,937
Reputation
-2,558
Daps
235,502
Malcolm X was Conservative. MLK was Conservative. The Coli is on something totally different. Y'all seem right of the right. Some of you seem a little further out there than your average Black Conservative. Not entirely bad....because honestly id take a Coli-Conservative over a David Clarke Black Conservative. But some of the views on here(in TLR specifically) are more extreme than your regular right of center everyday Black man.

:mjpls:
:gucci: No they werent you fukking piece of shyt.

MLK and X both were adopting socialist view points at the end of their live. Both were pretty left on the economic platform throughout their public career.
 

iFightSeagullsForBread

The Working Class Hero
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Messages
8,511
Reputation
-890
Daps
27,260
Reppin
Somewhere in Chicago
We have no "advancements". We're being set up for mass genocide and we're sitting here breaking our arm trying to pat ourselves on the back with nothing to show for it. Why can't you point out anything these "elites" have done in the last 50 years?
:stopitslime:
Just admit it breh, these hand picked bougie token negros aren't on our team.

As someone who disagrees with you, I'd think you'd be better off formulating your own team with its own interests.

And it's definitely doable. The alt-right has done it, here in Chicago we have many similar groups on both sides of the spectrum doing just that.

:yeshrug: Just keep the zealots at bay and you'll be fine I suppose.

And. I must say I find it funny people think BLM is actually an organisation tho
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,268
Reputation
7,105
Daps
109,537
:pachaha:
That would be great but these negros are too busy chasing intersectionality & euro acceptance from their white handlers.
What's with the opposition to intersectionality on this board? :deadrose:
I don't think its a wild concept to believe that Black men have a vastly different set of issues than White men, or that Black women have a vastly different set of issues than White women, or that Black women have a different set of issues than Black men. :mjgrin:
Acknowledging that helps so we won't have more broken nonsense in social movements or organizations like letting another Eldridge Cleaver lead shyt :dame:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-554
Daps
15,338
Reppin
WestMidWest
I'm not shytting on BLM, I'm calling it what it is: a fake pro-black movement funded by cacs to push their gay agenda. If that's what you want to support then go ahead, but I know I won't.
your characterization is wrong
More importantly, I ask again, how have you continued to not support any entity that includes white funding, white liberal, or gay associations?
 

D-NICE

All Star
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
1,350
Reputation
710
Daps
6,725
Reppin
Nashville Tenn
As someone who disagrees with you, I'd think you'd be better off formulating your own team with its own interests.

And it's definitely doable. The alt-right has done it, here in Chicago we have many similar groups on both sides of the spectrum doing just that.

:yeshrug: Just keep the zealots at bay and you'll be fine I suppose.

And. I must say I find it funny people think BLM is actually an organisation tho


BLM is an organization. Its mostly been tied to the motto but it does exist with some form of leadership. That being said, you basically hit the nail on the head and the point I been getting to. We can have more than one movement going at the same time. Thats what happened in the 60's. But like you said people need to keep it cordial on both sides. People need to save the little insults and smug attitudes cause we generally wanting the same goal and none of us truthfully got the right answer to get to it right now.
 

AlainLocke

Banned
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
16,258
Reputation
2,670
Daps
74,040
What's with the opposition to intersectionality on this board? :deadrose:
I don't think its a wild concept to believe that Black men have a vastly different set of issues than White men, or that Black women have a vastly different set of issues than White women, or that Black women have a different set of issues than Black men. :mjgrin:
Acknowledging that helps so we won't have more broken nonsense in social movements or organizations like letting another Eldridge Cleaver lead shyt :dame:

The problem with intersectionality is that it isn't based on facts but assumptions.

For example, intersectionality states that Black males are in an inferior position due to their race and a superior position due to their gender...thus we oppress Black women...

How can that be true when we are the most jailed, dead, unemployed and least educated?

And Black women are more employed than us, more educated than us?

These are facts....intersectionality says males by default superior than women and Blacknes is inferior to Whiteness. So that also means...Black men are oppressors of ANY woman...even White women.

Most of these organizations are led by research written by Black feminists and Black people that use Black feminist theories...which aren't based on any facts...even to the point that the most prominent Black theorist of our times, Bell Hooks don't even use citations in her work.

Intersectionality is just another case of Black male demonization...it isn't factual whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
Top