I want to be down with Yang but I really wanna see someone challenge his ideas. Like Im no expert so this is probally a basic ass question but why wouldnt UBI over time just create inflation? More money in hands means more spening power yes but the demand of goods would go up so much that the only way to keep suply is to raise prices on stuff. Or am I missing something? I have no issues being schooled on stuff like this. I hope at the next debate we can see some canidates engage with him on this idea.
No worries breh it's a legit question. I have heard a few economists from good schools say the printing money leads to inflation.
The velocity of money creates inflation. Basically, how is the money used or how fast the money exchange hands. Say I give cats 100 dollars. Next I say today Nas will be dropping Illmatic part 2 on every corner, a lot of cats would pick it up. So more money would be changing hands, so the velocity of money would go up, and inflation would follow. But say after I give every one 100 dollar I say Big Sean is dropping an album some people with cop it and some people would rather save the 100, so the velocity of money doesn't go up so no increase in inflation.
It's how the money is used? Since most people in America have ridiculous amounts of personal debt, the funds will either go to that, be saved for rainy days or invested.
Japan has never turned off the printing press since the 1990s. Giving away money by a whole bunch of creative means. Japanese love to save the money instead. The velocity of money is what causes inflation, not the increase in the money supply.
The only time in history where inflation or hyperinflation happened is when countries wanted it!