bold reads like an oxymoron to mei'm skeptical about any historic accounts that mention columbus and/or are recorded by the roman catholic church. they leave too much of the story out..fukk a columbus
An Ancient Bible With A "Black " Image Of "Christ" Found On 2 Men Smuggling Artifacts From Syria
- Thread starter H.I.M.
- Start date
-
- Tags
- all praises
bold reads like an oxymoron to mei'm skeptical about any historic accounts that mention columbus and/or are recorded by the roman catholic church. they leave too much of the story out..fukk a columbus
Couldn’t be more obvious"Top boy"
If you dont get your cac ass on
Undefined187
Banned
Couldn’t be more obvious
Do you seriously believe the inhabitants of the Levant in the 1st Century were black?
Not even asking about Jesus because I personally am not religious.
Pigments and parchments darken as they age, so this doesn't really prove anything (The figure's skin color is the same as the surrounding page, which has obviously darkened with age).
Jesus definitely wasn't white/Caucasian/Hellenistic, but he wasn't Nubian either. He was a middle Eastern Jew.
Jesus definitely wasn't white/Caucasian/Hellenistic, but he wasn't Nubian either. He was a middle Eastern Jew.
Everythingg
King-Over-Kingz
Yes. They didnt know the "India" that we know today as "India" but Hindustan. Know this dude got banned, but thats just for the record.
Everythingg
King-Over-Kingz
i'm skeptical about any historic accounts that mention columbus and/or are recorded by the roman catholic church. they leave too much of the story out..fukk a columbus
The point is that when they were FIRST looking for the promised land, they were over here in the Americas looking. They then got rich/fat off what they found here, then shifted the focus somewhere else. Your point makes no sense when you take that in
tf does this have to do with jews being exiled or anything else your talking about..you said "colombus is the proof" i said ion believe shyt with colombus name on it because it's cacs writing the history books and i can't help but consider the source of the info i'm being fed..believe that shyt ya social studies teacher told u if want
The point is that when they were FIRST looking for the promised land, they were over here in the Americas looking. They then got rich/fat off what they found here, then shifted the focus somewhere else. Your point makes no sense when you take that in
DoubleClutch
Superstar
The point is that when they were FIRST looking for the promised land, they were over here in the Americas looking. They then got rich/fat off what they found here, then shifted the focus somewhere else. Your point makes no sense when you take that in
Ok but were they looking for THE “promised land” literally of the Torah or a new “promised land” by their own definition in conquest and exploration that they could call their own?
What were they expecting to do with the people they find there? Help them? Convert them? Make friends? Or was the plan always to just get rich and take advantage of the people regardless
None of it makes sense logically or even if you try fitting it into some religious narrative or theory
Everythingg
King-Over-Kingz
Then dont believe it bruh...My point was that the narrative changed from Israel being over here in the Americas it being over there in the middle east. Just as "India" changed from being here in the Americas, to over there in 1954. Its me saying "hey the narrative changed because they're trying to hide something...
Yes
Yes
Yes
Not my problem
DoubleClutch
Superstar
My point was that the narrative changed from Israel being over here in the Americas it being over there in the middle east. Just as "India" changed from being here in the Americas, to over there in 1954. Its me saying "hey the narrative changed because they're trying to hide something...
Yes
Yes
Yes
Not my problem
Yes the “literal” promised land God reserved for Israelite people in the Torah thousands of years ago.....
or
Yes, a new interpretation of a “promised land” open to any explorer in modern times based on their ideas of Christian conquest and “manifest destiny”?
Which one?
Either way, traveling the world looking for “Gods chosen people” just to kill them and take their land “in the name of God” doesn’t seem backwards to you?
My wife's family is Egyptian Christians, they trace their history back to the 1st century AD, long before the Arabs got there, and they're genetically distinct from Arabs. They vary in skin tone but the darkest ones are from southern Egypt or the Sudanese or Ethiopian borders, not northern Egypt near the Israeli/Arab region. You read their ancient historical texts and they refer to Nubians and Ethiopians as Black, which makes it seem pretty unlikely that they themselves were Black and certainly not the Israelis.
It's believable to me that Jesus would have been towards the darker end of today's Palestinians but gotta have some doubt that he was out there looking like an Ethiopian, it don't fit what we know of the people of the time themselves.
Everythingg
King-Over-Kingz
yes
Either way, traveling the world looking for “Gods chosen people” just to kill them and take their land “in the name of God” doesn’t seem backwards to you?
God said Hed bring a nation from afar to do just that so no. It seems to go right along with the script to me
BlackJesus
Spread science, save with coupons
We ouchea