Amber Guyger Found Guilty of Murder!!!..... 10 years

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,377
Reputation
3,317
Daps
53,729
Reppin
CALI
SHE SHOT HIM WITH THE INTENT TO KILL
SHE DIDNT SHOOT HIM BY ACCIDENT.
That's not how a murder charge works. Especially since she's a cop.

She had to have known she was at the wrong apartment and was planning to murder him when she got there to prove a murder charge. Her story is that she thought she was at her apartment and was shooting an intruder, which makes it hard to prove murder.

If they charge her with murder the prosecutor would have to prove that she lied about thinking she was at her apartment, and that killing this man was her intent from the beginning.

That is the reason I believe the judge wanted a murder charge, because it would be easier for her to beat.

If they charge her with murder, this will end like the Zimmerman case did. He would be in jail right now if they charged him with manslaughter because they couldn't prove that he got out of his car with the intent to murder Trayvon.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,234
Reputation
11,545
Daps
368,330
Reppin
CHICAGO
That's not how a murder charge works. Especially since she's a cop.

She had to have known she was at the wrong apartment and was planning to murder him when she got there to prove a murder charge. Her story is that she thought she was at her apartment and was shooting an intruder, which makes it hard to prove murder.

If they charge her with murder the prosecutor would have to prove that she lied about thinking she was at her apartment, and that killing this man was her intent from the beginning.

That is the reason I believe the judge wanted a murder charge, because it would be easier for her to beat.

If they charge her with murder, this will end like the Zimmerman case did. He would be in jail right now if they charged him with manslaughter because they couldn't prove that he got out of his car with the intent to murder Trayvon.

LMAO

THATS NOT WHY HE GOT OFF.

HE GOT OFF BECAUSE OF THE STAND YOUR GROUND LAW.

2ND DEGREE MURDER ISNT PREMEDITATED
AND IS WHAT SHE SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH.


:devil:
:evil:

 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,377
Reputation
3,317
Daps
53,729
Reppin
CALI

LMAO

THATS NOT WHY HE GOT OFF.

HE GOT OFF BECAUSE OF THE STAND YOUR GROUND LAW.

2ND DEGREE MURDER ISNT PREMEDITATED
AND IS WHAT SHE SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH.


:devil:
:evil:

First degree murder involves a premeditated killing, meaning the killer made a plan to kill the victim and then carried that plan out. Second degree murder does not require premeditation, however. Instead, there are three typical situations that can constitute second degree murder:

  • A killing done impulsively without premeditation, but with "malice aforethought"
  • A killing that results from an act intended to cause serious bodily harm
  • A killing that results from an act that demonstrates the perpetrators "depraved indifference" to human life
For example, Adam and Bill are neighbors, and lately they've been having disagreements over the fence between their properties. Adam pays Bill a visit to discuss the matter, but gets angry in the process, pulls out a gun and shoots and kills Bill.

Adam didn't have any plan to kill Bill when he went to Bill's house that day, so there was no premeditation. At the time of the murder, however, Adam fully intended to kill Bill because of his anger over the fence, so there was malice aforethought. Most states that distinguish between degrees of murder would consider that a second degree murder.
They would have to prove that she knew that wasn't her apartment for a 2nd degree murder charge, her story is that she thought she was at her apartment.


Zimmerman did not invoke the stand your ground law as a defense.
 

MR. Conclusion

All Star
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
2,585
Reputation
400
Daps
8,839
Reppin
Atlanta
If they charge her with murder she may end up getting off. If the story is that she went to the wrong apartment then they gotta charge her with manslaughter if they want her to serve any time at all.

You'd have to prove that she knowingly went to the wrong apartment with the intent to kill this dude for a murder charge to stick.

If her argument is that she was tired and ending up at his apartment was an accident, a manslaughter charge would be a more viable option.


I think the reason the judge wouldn't sign a warrant unless it was for murder was a trap cause then the prosecutors would have a difficult time proving that her actions were premeditated.

Interesting. :jbhmm:
 

G-Zeus

G-Zeus Chrystler...the brehsident
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,446
Reputation
1,527
Daps
40,256
Reppin
Brehsident evil
They would have to prove that she knew that wasn't her apartment for a 2nd degree murder charge, her story is that she thought she was at her apartment.


Zimmerman did not invoke the stand your ground law as a defense.
zimmerman DID.. i saw o'mara do it live.. saying everything is consistent with him defending himself..

and she would be convicted on manslaughter.. however.. all they gotta prove is they knew each other for 2nd degree...if they dont she should get manslaughter.
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,377
Reputation
3,317
Daps
53,729
Reppin
CALI
zimmerman DID.. i saw o'mara do it live.. saying everything is consistent with him defending himself..

and she would be convicted on manslaughter.. however.. all they gotta prove is they knew each other for 2nd degree...if they dont she should get manslaughter.
Look up the Zimmerman case, stand your ground was not part of his defense.

Yes if she knew dude then its murder, but if they cant find any proof of that then she could beat a murder charge.
 

Nigerianwonder

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,566
Reputation
1,826
Daps
29,312
Reppin
NULL
That's not how a murder charge works. Especially since she's a cop.

She had to have known she was at the wrong apartment and was planning to murder him when she got there to prove a murder charge. Her story is that she thought she was at her apartment and was shooting an intruder, which makes it hard to prove murder.

If they charge her with murder the prosecutor would have to prove that she lied about thinking she was at her apartment, and that killing this man was her intent from the beginning.

That is the reason I believe the judge wanted a murder charge, because it would be easier for her to beat.

If they charge her with murder, this will end like the Zimmerman case did. He would be in jail right now if they charged him with manslaughter because they couldn't prove that he got out of his car with the intent to murder Trayvon.

That's not correct. Its murder simply because she intended to kill him when she pulled her gun and shot him. Premeditation can happen in an instant. And based on her story thats exactly what happened. Whether she was at the wrong apartment is irrelevant and separate. The shooting was not accidental even if the circumstances leading to it were.
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,377
Reputation
3,317
Daps
53,729
Reppin
CALI
That's not correct. Its murder simply because she intended to kill him when she pulled her gun and shot him. Premeditation can happen in an instant. And based on her story thats exactly what happened. Whether she was at the wrong apartment is irrelevant and separate. The shooting was not accidental even if the circumstances leading to it were.
Just look up what defines murder in regards to the laws in this country and realize that this lady is a cop who will be treated as such.

If they charge this woman with murder she will walk.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,234
Reputation
11,545
Daps
368,330
Reppin
CHICAGO
They would have to prove that she knew that wasn't her apartment for a 2nd degree murder charge, her story is that she thought she was at her apartment.


Zimmerman did not invoke the stand your ground law as a defense.

SHE INTENDED TO CAUSE BODILY HARM
WHEN SHE SHOT HIM.

SHE DIDNT WALK INTO HIS APARTMENT.
HE OPENED THE fukkING DOOR
AND WAS SHOT.

THATS NOT MANSLAUGHTER.
IT WAS MURDER AND SHE MOST LIKELY
WAS DRUNK OR HIGH WHEN IT HAPPENED.

THESE RACISTS DIDNT EVEN GET HER TOXICOLOGY
UNTIL WELL AFTER THE FACT
WHICH MOST LIKELY GAVE HER TIME TO FLUSH HER SYSTEM.
:devil:
:evil:

 

Gold

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Messages
43,670
Reputation
19,591
Daps
292,427
That's not correct. Its murder simply because she intended to kill him when she pulled her gun and shot him. Premeditation can happen in an instant. And based on her story thats exactly what happened. Whether she was at the wrong apartment is irrelevant and separate. The shooting was not accidental even if the circumstances leading to it were.

Exactly. She did not accidentally kill him. She 100% intended to kill him.
Her only defense is that she had a complete misunderstanding of the circumstance, but its still murder.
 

Typical Knicks Fan

F-ing Knicks.
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,741
Reputation
2,041
Daps
25,239
Reppin
New York
Nah. Texas statute says:

A person commits [murder] if he:

(1) intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual;

(2) intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual[.]

PENAL CODE CHAPTER 19. CRIMINAL HOMICIDE

It was murder and she is going to get away with it. I hope the toxicology report shows how drunk she was because then they'll upgrade the charges to 2nd degree murder.
It’s all about what the prosecution can prove to a jury. If they know they don’t have a chance at a murder conviction because she’s a white female cop in Texas they would rather go with a lesser charge like manslaughter. The deceased can’t speak so it’s only her side of the story, unless video evidence comes up like in North Carolina where that officer was seen shooting Walter Scott in the back as he was running away.
 

Gold

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Messages
43,670
Reputation
19,591
Daps
292,427
It’s all about what the prosecution can prove to a jury. If they know they don’t have a chance at a murder conviction because she’s a white female cop in Texas they would rather go with a lesser charge like manslaughter. The deceased can’t speak so it’s only her side of the story, unless video evidence comes up like in North Carolina where that officer was seen shooting Walter Scott in the back as he was running away.

I hear where you're coming from. We all want the same thing, which is for her not to skate on by with an acquittal.

But if they cannot prove murder in this case... they need to find another profession :snoop:
 
Top