Am I the only one who didnt know Africa was named by European explorers? ...original name bushed

Bushmaster69

Superstar
Joined
Nov 7, 2013
Messages
3,992
Reputation
869
Daps
17,386
Africans not stranding on they 10 toes. Go get spanked by a Chinese. Again, WHITE FOLKS RUNNING A TRAIN ON YOUR shyt. fukk YOU p*ssy.

My shyt was valid lil "nikka".

You would have no teeth left in your mouth if you said that to me in person.

You even write like the typical lowest common denominator.

Gtfo :camby:
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
50,070
Reputation
15,267
Daps
183,934
Aight. Let bring some actual knowledge here

The OG name of the Motherland is actually Afu-Ra-Ka/Afuraitkait. Given in the Nile River Valley (Kemet)

Afu = Flesh; House; Flesh of Ra/Rait
Ra = Sun. Children of the Sun. This denotes black people.
Ka/Kait = Land


Most of this is based on hieroglyphics. Set in stone.

Publius Cornelius Scipio did not name the continent of Afrika. It was after he invaded Northern Afrika in the Punic Wars that he named himself "Africanus".

The Arab version "ifriqia" comes from the roman corruption Africa. It is often suggested that the reason why the Romans used the term is that the roman suffix –ca means ‗land‘ and Afri is the name of an Amazigh tribe who occupied the land when the Romans invaded.

The Romans are therefore said to have called the territory in the northern part of the continent: the land, ca, of the Afri people, hence Afri-ca.

The Amazigh ethnic group mentioned is called the Aourigha, often written Afarik. We have shown above clearly that the term ka (qa) definitely does mean land (high land), however, it is not a term created by the Romans. The roman ca, is a version of the term ka, that the Romans learned of when they invaded Kamit. The Afri people or Afarik (Aourigha) did not materialize on the continent when the Romans arrived. Their Ancestry, their language, and thus their ethnic name reflects the culture of the region that they inhabited, North Afuraka/Afuraitkait. This, of course, is the region of Kemet and the areas west and east of Kemet where the Pharaonic culture was found as well. The ancient Aourigha inhabited these areas over 10,000 years before the invasion of the whites.

Today‘s Amazigh is represented by the original Afurakani/Afuraitkaitnit Aourigha of the region and misrepresented by the descendants of white Europeans and white Arabs who invaded and polluted the blood of some of the Afurakanu/Afuraitkaitnut. The white and white-Arab mixed descendants of white
invaders/rapists falsely refer to themselves as Amazigh (Aourigha) and Berbers, just as white Arab invaders in Kemet (Egypt) today falsely call themselves ―Egyptians.

The two links below go more in-depth.

AFURAKA/AFURAITKAIT – The Origin of the term ‘Africa’




About the name "Alkebu-lan" which is an Islamic name. We should know that Islam didn't make it into the continent until the 7th century CE.


Knowledge is power


There is no OG name of the “motherland” just like there’s no OG name for the Sun.

Different tribes named things differently.

That was one name given by one of the Kemetian dynasties, but it’s not the first or only name for the land, even during that time.

Good info on one of the names though.
 

Marco Zen

Black Privilege
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
11,724
Reputation
2,516
Daps
38,827
Reppin
The Other A
I'm not, my point was that the name didn't really matter by using examples of other nations.


Do y'all think whites have their thumbs on Asians because their continent is called Asia named by whites?

This was what I meant by self pity and feeling bad about stupid shyt in the first page.

Why do you automatically view it as stupid shyt amd self pity and feeling bad instead of "hmm wow I never thought about that, wow that's interesting, wow I'm enlightened I'd like to know more"??


Self pity :mjlol: MF stop
 

The Plug

plug couldnt trust you now u cant trust the plug
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,892
Reputation
829
Daps
18,221
Why do you automatically view it as stupid shyt amd self pity and feeling bad instead of "hmm wow I never thought about that, wow that's interesting, wow I'm enlightened I'd like to know more"??


Self pity :mjlol: MF stop
nikkas in this thread don't find it interesting, nikkas in this thread are on some "damn, the white man are controlling black people" shyt.
"Asian" people only use those names when they've been indoctrinated.

A Chinese person in Asia might call that land mass Yazhou.

China is Zhōngguó.

Japan is Nippon-koku.

Etc..
All of the top Asian officials call their continent Asia. Those mfs that are going around buying up land in every country in the world and building up debt in every country call it Asia. They're not "indoctrinated" they just know that the name of the continent is an irrelevancy.

I don't care what Asians do. I didn't even know and don't care. I only care about US. If Asians let it rock that's for them to deal with.

I'm not comparing my race to any other race. It's always a comparison when it comes to us. Everybody thumb their noses at black people saying we don't know our own history, including Africans.

Who also don't know theirs:yeshrug:
You should care because you don't live in a vacuum. There are more pressing things than whether Africa was called Africa by some cacs centuries or millenia ago.
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
50,070
Reputation
15,267
Daps
183,934
nikkas in this thread don't find it interesting, nikkas in this thread are on some "damn, the white man are controlling black people" shyt.

All of the top Asian officials call their continent Asia. Those mfs that are going around buying up land in every country in the world and building up debt in every country call it Asia. They're not "indoctrinated" they just know that the name of the continent is an irrelevancy.


You should care because you don't live in a vacuum. There are more pressing things than whether Africa was called Africa by some cacs centuries or millenia ago.

They have been indoctrinated in world geopolitical policy, aka white supremacy.

The current leaders of just about every nation today outside of North Korea, Russia, Venezuela, Cuba, and some Middle Eastern nations are all tied together.

Most of todays global leaders all went to University together, belong to the same clubs, and are all working towards a similar goal.

They have petty beefs but they’re too interconnected to actually go to war.

The real powers that be got rid of most of the real threats to this shyt around the world 60 years ago.
 
Last edited:

GrindtooFilthy

World Class SuperVillain
Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
16,214
Reputation
3,123
Daps
43,447
Reppin
MA, CT, NH
Where did the name alkebulan originate from I’m still waiting on an answer this. And no it’s not Arabic folks are reaching. Sudan was what the Arab world used to describe Africa Back in the day
 

3rd Ward Swangin

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
8,500
Reputation
299
Daps
22,605
nikkas in this thread don't find it interesting, nikkas in this thread are on some "damn, the white man are controlling black people" shyt.

All of the top Asian officials call their continent Asia. Those mfs that are going around buying up land in every country in the world and building up debt in every country call it Asia. They're not "indoctrinated" they just know that the name of the continent is an irrelevancy.


You should care because you don't live in a vacuum. There are more pressing things than whether Africa was called Africa by some cacs centuries or millenia ago.
You can focus on more than one thing. From what you're saying, I shouldn't care whether it was named by whites and their still going by that. At the same time you're saying I should care about Asian's:mjtf:
 

The Plug

plug couldnt trust you now u cant trust the plug
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,892
Reputation
829
Daps
18,221
They have been indoctrinated in world geopolitical policy, aka white supremacy.

The current leaders of just about every nation today outside of North Korea, Russia, Venezuela, Cuba, and some Middle Eastern nations are all tied together.

Most of todays global leaders all went to University together, belong to the same clubs, and are all working towards a similar goal.

They have petty beefs but they’re too interconnected to actually go to war.

The real powers that be got rid of most of the real threats to this shyt around the world 60 years ago.
nikka what are you talking about here? You're talking about Chinese leaders are white supremacists as they're boxing out whites and other races for their resources? Nothing of that sort is petty and bringing up war is so far left field from talking about the name of a continent.
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
50,070
Reputation
15,267
Daps
183,934
nikka what are you talking about here? You're talking about Chinese leaders are white supremacists as they're boxing out whites and other races for their resources? Nothing of that sort is petty and bringing up war is so far left field from talking about the name of a continent.

We're having two completely different conversations.

I said what a regular Chinese person, not indoctrinated in Western culture, might call the land mass known as China depending on their language.

You came back and said their "leaders" refer to the land as China.

I responded by speaking on why Chinese "leaders" call the land mass China.

What are you confused about?
 

The Plug

plug couldnt trust you now u cant trust the plug
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,892
Reputation
829
Daps
18,221
We're having two completely different conversations.

I said what a regular Chinese person, not indoctrinated in Western culture, might call the land mass known as China depending on their language.

You came back and said their "leaders" refer to the land as China.

I responded by speaking on why Chinese "leaders" call the land mass China.

What are you confused about?
What are you confused about? Your implication is that the leaders of Asian countries are all indoctrinated in Western culture so they're white supremacists yet didn't prove so then prior to that said regular Chinese people call Asia something else without proving so and you're now adding that to why they call it to China too? You're just typing all over the place.
 

Asante

All Star
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
1,867
Reputation
95
Daps
5,394
Af-ra-ka = Of Ra’s Soul in Medu-Neter (an African language).
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
50,070
Reputation
15,267
Daps
183,934
What are you confused about? Your implication is that the leaders of Asian countries are all indoctrinated in Western culture so they're white supremacists yet didn't prove so then prior to that said regular Chinese people call Asia something else without proving so and you're now adding that to why they call it to China too? You're just typing all over the place.

No, you just have to slow down and comprehend what I'm saying instead of trying to score points in an argument you're having with yourself.

I'm not making up anything I said.

China is not called China by the majority of their citizens.

Japan is not called Japan by most of its citizens.

Asia is not called Asia by most of its citizens.

So on and so forth.

This is actual facts.


(just a quick visual of what I'm saying)
what-countries-call-themselves_o_2897623.jpg
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
50,070
Reputation
15,267
Daps
183,934
Roman General Scipio Africanus defeated General Hannibal and that's how AFRICA got it a name.

False.

Roman generals gave themselves surnames and titles dependent on the lands/people they conquered.

They had more than one title.

Scipio's most famous title just happens to be famous because some people have narrowed that title down to the origin of the name Africa, due to lazy research.

By the time of Scipio, some of the land called "Africa" today was already being called that by some Romans, due to their interactions with the people they named the Afri tribe.

When Scipio conquered a very small part of what's called Africa today, a small part mostly populated by the "Afri tribe", he named himself Scipio Africanus, meaning, "Scipio, conquerer of the Afri people and ruler of their land".

The Afri people was one tribe, not the entire population of the land mass called Africa today.

Afri - Wikipedia.

"The etymology of the term for the country remains uncertain. It may derive from a Punic (Roman) term for an indigenous population of the area surrounding Carthage."

Even that probably wasn't their name, another name given to them by Europeans.

The more I research, I don't think there was ever any one name for that land mass, or any one for what we consider tribes today, that was widely accepted.

Ethiopian, Egyptian, Nigerian, South African, Igbo, Yoruba, Jamaican, Haitian... most of that shyt is based in names that white people gave to whoever they wanted to.

We don't know who we are at all.

I used to think it was just us, FBA/ADOS, but these proudly African and Caribbean nikkas have no idea either.

All we have is the names white folks gave us, and whatever cultures we created directly in relation to our interactions with them.

Some groups have just been able to record and remember those names and cultures better than others, since the war began, but we're all out here living a culture that we didn't create naturally before any interactions with the white man.

Before getting in your feelings and debating me, every group of black people, research the name of your nation, the origin of your tribe, the origins of the foods you think are native to your people, your religion, your tribal dances, your tribal marks, hairstyles, every single aspect of your culture, and if you research correctly, what you will find is all of the information you find will start with whatever group you identify with's interactions with white people or other foreign invaders.

Sad...
 
Last edited:
Top