Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Its either recency bias or nostalgia goggles, theres really no way to objectively rate games at this point without pissing people off
you're telling me the Gamecube or OG Xbox couldn't run that game?
AT BEST, the new Zelda looks like a launch PS3 game
There's more to a video game than just visuals.
No doubt.
But Zelda games start out with a minimum 9.0 off the rip.
Imagine an xbox game with a re-used map and shyt performance.Honestly for what I played its getting overrated and its pretty funny seeing reviewers ignore the awful performance just because its on switch, but it is pretty good not a fukking 7/10.
Just hope we get a new map for the next game and some actual improvements to the gameplay, the new powerd are amazing but other than that is still exactly the same as Breath.
Imagine an xbox game with a re-used map and shyt performance.
7 would be the Max it could score
No doubt.
But Zelda games start out with a minimum 9.0 off the rip.
you're telling me the Gamecube or OG Xbox couldn't run that game?
AT BEST, the new Zelda looks like a launch PS3 game
Imagine an xbox game
Word.
I agree that gaming reviewers are biased as hell - I addressed it in my second post in this thread. I find it funny at how hyperbolic the OP is though saying it can run on hardware from three generations ago.