ALL TIME....THE HEART BREAK KID SHAWN MICHAELS...or the MACHO MAN RANDY SAVAGE...REAL simple

Hickenbottom vs. Poffo

  • SHAWN MICHAELS

    Votes: 64 37.6%
  • RANDY SAVAGE

    Votes: 98 57.6%
  • osu sucks

    Votes: 8 4.7%

  • Total voters
    170
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-70
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
also,..
this was the last moment in wrasslin history.
that the actual local live news all across the nation covered the story.
where they violated the wwf ideal of not showing the results on the news.
no hbk momentous win was ever given precedent.
where local news networks risked being sued to cover.

you can say that hbk has higher workrate,..
yet, neither bret nor hbk were ever singularly higher draws than warrior at his height..

t


art barr
This is what I'm sayin.

Shawn's most defining moment as the WWF's top guy was when he beat Bret Hart for the title in the iron man match. Only thing is nobody was watching. The majority of the audience they had regained as a result of the attitude era had to learn of it after the fact.

Meanwhile Warrior's meteoric rise and crowning achievement was witnessed by an entire generation of fans, hence why he remains one of the biggest legends of all time in spite of the WWE basically ignoring him and pretending like he didn't exist for 20 years.
 

THEREALBRAND

Eterno Menino
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,332
Reputation
5,210
Daps
80,498
Reppin
Eu Sou O Segundo
I take no shame in being a mark. In fact marks have more fun.

I will always be a mark first, smark second.

When I watch a movie or a TV show the things that most draw me in are the characters and the story. Same with wrestling. It is a show after all.

So feel free to harp on the technical achievements behind the scenes, that is your perogotive. Personally I would prefer to just enjoy the show.

And the result of the match is very important, because your value as a box office draw determines how strongly you are booked. That's why hogan was unbeatable for damn near 6-7 years and why austin was considered the "toughest SOB".

I don't know why you keep insisting that it doesn't matter. Why else wouldn't shawn have a clean win over any of the top, top legends? Simple, he wasn't on their level.

:clap:

You must spread reputation to at least 30 other user(s) before you can give reputation to Kill Dat Noize again.
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,328
Reputation
5,864
Daps
93,989
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
also,..
this was the last moment in wrasslin history.
that the actual local live news all across the nation covered the story.
where they violated the wwf ideal of not showing the results on the news.
no hbk momentous win was ever given precedent.
where local news networks risked being sued to cover.

you can say that hbk has higher workrate,..
yet, neither bret nor hbk were ever singularly higher draws than warrior at his height..

t


art barr

this is true but im not sure how well it translates throughout time since then in many different aspects of analyzing all the variables (wrestler's top peak/draw, ability, legacy and the biz altogether). no internet, less people with cable or buying PPVs..plus hulk was already a mega-star and this was after Macho was established as a super-star as well. millions upon millions of people watched hogan lose the belt to andre..the megapowers etc etc you know the history. wrestling was huge and a lot of its popularity came from andre/hogan then macho/elizabeth/dibiase etc extending the drama with the vacated belt the underlying tension with hogan and macho...

warrior's push coincided exactly with all of this including his ppv debut being at WMIV which, of course, was a gigantic spectacle. lifestyles of the rich and famous and all the vignettes for dibiase...bob uecker, vanna white...atlantic city etc. all of this was huge crossover and entertainment stuff with Macho working his ass off in every match. rude and jake ended in a draw..jake was popular and warrior had beaten rude before...plus warrior went over at the ppv without being involved in the tournament. that was significant for warrior's growth, particularly in this setting since he was not good in the ring other than his theatrics and looks...and that he beat a Heenan guy (someone who was prominently featured) and did so right after the Jake/Rude draw.

the momentum continued and grew with warrior alongside the macho/liz era with warrior pretty much always going over...he got the IC belt and was in a Goldberg zone in terms of winning then ultimately (no pun intended) collided with Hogan and won. Warrior deserves a lot of credit, sure...was he a draw? absolutely..but you cannot deny that WWF built him up perfectly during this huge era for that exact moment nor can you deny that WWF itself played a role in said news coverage becoming limited afterwards at best due to those threatened law-suits. bret and hbk were never singularly the draw warrior was during that brief period, no, but the conditions for them to be weren't quite as ideal for them as it was for Warrior. like i said Warrior deserves a lot of credit..but with the muscle-man super hero gimmick being at its peak, alongside andre/hogan/macho popularity..a good portion was right place right time. the stars aligned for the ultimate warrior and stars dont align that well very often. warrior knew it deep down too. his legacy, like many in all genres, is bulked up by it's immense popularity in a limited time-frame. i dont think warrior would be viewed as favorably if he stayed in the business consistently for a long time..he knew he reached his pinnacle and only re-emerged when he thought it had the possibility to be close to that again (vs Hogan in WCW)...he didnt want to experience the slow downturn in popularity that 95% of wrestlers inevitably experience
 

Wacky D

PROVOCATIVE POSTING
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
40,494
Reputation
489
Daps
36,583
We going to act like his match against Foley in 96 isn't the best wrestling match Foley ever had?

:mjlol:

do your googles and type in cactus jack brehs.

this goes back to what i was saying about a "classic" wwf match often times just being a regular day at the office for wcw.

this also goes back to what @Art Barr said about wcw/nwa/etc guys having to be brought in to upp the quality. yall prolly didnt catch it because yall were too busy letting the wwf lie to you and have you believe that those guys were wwf-created stars, when in reality, they were already established.

and theyre doing the same thing now with these roh cats, while undeservingly passing off the glory to their own homegrowns on the sly. thats low-key one of the things cm punk was mad about.

hbk never had more intangibles on macho's level.
let alone actual talent that resulted in the same type of draw.

macho dwarf's hbk in any and every category and he was a better more advanced high flyer as well.
as again, hbk was dated by a decade.
while macho, was pretty much flying across the ring like rvd's five star like fifteen years predating this.


art barr


yea. savage was way before his time.

he has to be the earliest example ive seen of a wrestler piledriving someone thru a table via ICW.

and yea, i never could quite put my finger on it firmly enough to put it into words. i always thought hbk was just sloppy, but you said it better. HIS STYLE WAS ALWAYS DATED and played out.

warrior's push coincided exactly with all of this including his ppv debut being at WMIV which, of course, was a gigantic spectacle. lifestyles of the rich and famous and all the vignettes for dibiase...bob uecker, vanna white...atlantic city etc. all of this was huge crossover and entertainment stuff with Macho working his ass off in every match. rude and jake ended in a draw..jake was popular and warrior had beaten rude before...plus warrior went over at the ppv without being involved in the tournament. that was significant for warrior's growth, particularly in this setting since he was not good in the ring other than his theatrics and looks...and that he beat a Heenan guy (someone who was prominently featured) and did so right after the Jake/Rude draw.
the momentum continued and grew with warrior alongside the macho/liz era with warrior pretty much always going over...he got the IC belt and was in a Goldberg zone in terms of winning then ultimately (no pun intended) collided with Hogan and won. Warrior deserves a lot of credit, sure...was he a draw? absolutely..but you cannot deny that WWF built him up perfectly during this huge era for that exact moment nor can you deny that WWF itself played a role in said news coverage becoming limited afterwards at best due to those threatened law-suits. bret and hbk were never singularly the draw warrior was during that brief period, no, but the conditions for them to be weren't quite as ideal for them as it was for Warrior. like i said Warrior deserves a lot of credit..but with the muscle-man super hero gimmick being at its peak, alongside andre/hogan/macho popularity..a good portion was right place right time. the stars aligned for the ultimate warrior and stars dont align that well very often. warrior knew it deep down too. his legacy, like many in all genres, is bulked up by it's immense popularity in a limited time-frame. i dont think warrior would be viewed as favorably if he stayed in the business consistently for a long time..he knew he reached his pinnacle and only re-emerged when he thought it had the possibility to be close to that again (vs Hogan in WCW)...he didnt want to experience the slow downturn in popularity that 95% of wrestlers inevitably experience


warrior didnt care about the bolded like that breh. that was always one of the things he was criticized for. his lack of love for the business. so you cant turn around and try to put that on him too. its either one or the other.

everybodies success coincides with something dog. and if he was just in the right place/right time like youre painting it, then they could easily make another warrior. the same way theres guys in the promotion right now that have already surpassed hbk & bret in what they excelled at.

and lets not pretend that vince hasnt ALWAYS been favorable to the monsters and super heroes, no matter what the era. hence, the reason why cena & batista have been at the forefront for the past decade. and theyre still not the warrior.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-70
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
warrior didnt care about the bolded like that breh. that was always one of the things he was criticized for. his lack of love for the business. so you cant turn around and try to put that on him too. its either one or the other.

i believe that was more slander spread by vince and those in the business who envied his success. warrior clearly had a passion for what he did because otherwise it wouldn't have showed in his work. you can't fake that kind of emotion in those promos. homebody really took that shyt seriously. you never watched a warrior promo and believed he wasn't really bout that life. when he said he worked and sacrificed to be the greatest, you believed him.

none of us know what happens behind closed doors or in their personal lives. just because warrior became disillusioned to the business and chose to walk away from it, it doesn't mean he never had a love for it. you don't become that successful at something you don't love.

but for him i guess it was just a stage in his life, rather than being his WHOLE life. obviously other things were more important.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-70
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
Cena is a bigger star than Macho Man was. :yeshrug:

Justin Bieber is a bigger star than Nas :yeshrug:

cena's legacy is a tricky one because i believe so many people from our generation look upon this era in disdain. unfortunately that's ultimately going to hurt him.
 

PYRRHUS 88

Shredder
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
3,281
Reputation
631
Daps
7,315
Reppin
Realistic Coop Replica
cena's legacy is a tricky one because i believe so many people from our generation look upon this era in disdain. unfortunately that's ultimately going to hurt him.


But the numbers state that he's one of the most popular (merch sales would confirm this), biggest drawing (look at those WM records) wrestlers ever. Top 4 along with Hogan, Austin and Rock undeniably.

He's also been booked to go over everyone for years and years, which you've already said you see as an indicator of greatness in Warrior's case.
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-70
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
But the numbers state that he's one of the most popular (merch sales would confirm this), biggest drawing (look at those WM records) wrestlers ever. Top 4 along with Hogan, Austin and Rock undeniably.

He's also been booked to go over everyone for years and years, which you've already said you see as an indicator of greatness in Warrior's case.
True but look at his competition.
 

TNC

Hardbody
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,907
Reputation
965
Daps
9,441
yea but savage didn't exactly beat flair decisively for the title either. he won on a roll up (AND HE HAD A HANDFUL OF TIGHTS!!! :lolbron:).....

.... plus the title match happened during the middle of the card. once again proving that savage was never the premier wrestler during any of his prime years in the WWF.

i'm just sayin savage never really took it to a top, top all time legend during their prime and beat them clean and decisively for the 1-2-3. he was never on that level.

the question is would a PRIME bret hart or a PRIME shawn michales... have been able to beat a PRIME randy savage. all things considered, all faces, all with the crowd behind them.

A Prime Bret would have beaten a Prime Savage, but Savage would have outshined him.

Bret Hart was one of the most winning-est wrestlers ever, he's actually in the top ten of all time champions when it comes to win ratio, he's ahead of Austin, Flair, Hogan, HBK, Savage and Rock. Warrior is the only one I know that is higher than him
 

PYRRHUS 88

Shredder
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
3,281
Reputation
631
Daps
7,315
Reppin
Realistic Coop Replica
True but look at his competition.

Or you could put it the other way, look at the lack of help he's had in maintaining WWE's mainstream relevance. All of the other big mainstream star wrestlers had other big mainstream wrestlers in their era to help carry the load: Hogan, Macho Man and Warrior (although Hogan became mainstream before that). Austin, Rock, nWo, Goldberg (briefly), etc.

And lack of competition (ie being the only current-era guy who is a mainstream star) is actually an argument in his favour. It means he should get extra credit for those big WM buyrates and attendances...right?
 

TNC

Hardbody
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,907
Reputation
965
Daps
9,441
Dawg how the fukk you sound talking like Bret and Shawn Michales wasn't fukking draws my nikka. You might not like them but they don't make nikkas thats big draws champs. And Bret was a 5 time WC.


R=G is correct, Bret and HBK were not major draws. How BIG or LITTLE of a draw they were is something widely contested because nobody has strict numbers but there was a HUGE drop off from the Hogan/Savage/Warrior era. I always saw Bret as a consistant mid tier draw whereas HBK is kind of all over the place. The main reasons those guys got the belts were because A. they were loyal and quality workers, B. They didn't have the steroid look that so many wrestlers had at that time because Vince was trying to take the heat off the company and C. Vince lost almost all his big names from the 80s, so the mid card guys like Bret and HBK had to be elevated.



But I think Bret gets an unfair shake in wrestling history, he was the main reason Austin and Rock got the opportunity to rise to prominence because if Bret wasn't there to counter HBK being in Vince's ear, we might have been subjected to Stone Cold Paul Leveque :usure:
 
Top