World War 2 was millions of euros killing each other over their tribe how is that different?No.....globalization had not taken place so there was nothing at stake based on "race."
Where in the world does the need to acknowledge race as a concept not exist? This isn't the 1400s.
Who said my criticism only applies to Africa and not the entire diaspora
You're a c00n, then. by your own defintion.
Your contradict yourself shamelessly.
And you stay talking talking shyt about Caribs and Africans.
World War 2 was millions of euros killing each other over their tribe how is that different?
Most american black nationalist and integrationist groups hate or don't care about Africa. Pan-Africans are the only ones who want a collective of blacks in the dispora to be working together. Nationalist only care about the issues they face in their country and that country only.
Explain it again, then.You can't seem to read nor do you know what tribalism is...
No one's talking about literal half naked people in a tribe you dumbass.WW2 was fought over tribes?
What type of grades were you getting in history class?
Explain brexit? You must not know about foriegn affairs and international politics. Europeans are still fighting amongst themselves like I said before and I'm going to leave it at this When it comes to white people you have the franks, anglo-saxons,askhenazis, celtics, nordics, itlians, nordics, russians,slavs etc. Same with Asians. Europeans and Asians still fight to this day over ethnic groups. They just come together a lot of times when it comes to doing politics with people outside of their racial group. Don't really have anything else to add this conversation it's been held before. It becomes circular. Nationalist don't like pan-africanist and the theocrats dislike both and the integrationist hates all three.But they do now, and have for while now.
Can't have white supremacy without "Whites"
It doesn't matter what they subscribe to when the mechanisms making the current global society run says race is something that one has to be cognizant of.
Explain it again, then.
You're Pro-AA, but a Nigerian can't be Pro-Yoruba?
Like I can't believe Angola was listed as a country where c00ning isn't happening....
Just read an Angola brehs account of his countries social dynamics: Race relations in Angola
Cognizant is one thing... letting it be your main identity as a human being is another....
Any country with a nationality is tribalist at its core
Don't really understand you're tangent here doesn't apply to me. But look you can have a race and an ethnic group and your respective cultures . When it comes to white people you have the franks, anglo-saxons,slavs, celtics, nordics, itlians, nordics, russians, etc. Same for asians. Europeans and Asians still fight to this day over ethnic groups. They just come together a lot of times when it comes to doing politics with people outside of their racial group.
NO ONE IN THIS THREAD HAVE BEEN TO AFRICA.
Fact is Yugoslavia was a tribal war very similar to what we seen in Africa.The outcome of WW2 (which wasn't a tribal war) was a united Europe and a world power America.
And you want to compare a tiny window of "tribalism" (really just war) to 100s of years of a race not smartening up.