Afghanistan Thread | Taliban Rule

Arizax2

All Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
3,199
Reputation
286
Daps
10,089
Sure tell half your population to not bother doing anything with their lives other than give birth. This will only make your country stronger and compete in the world stage. This shyt is ridiculous. :gucci:
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,486
Reputation
5,926
Daps
62,965
Reppin
Knicks
If you could ever accurately poll the people, I wonder if they’d prefer American or Taliban occupation.
 

Json

Superstar
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
12,663
Reputation
1,358
Daps
38,299
Reppin
Central VA
If you could ever accurately poll the people, I wonder if they’d prefer American or Taliban occupation.
We only really “controlled” a small portion of the country aka the Metropolitan areas.

Most of these people just want to be left alone
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,486
Reputation
5,926
Daps
62,965
Reppin
Knicks
We only really “controlled” a small portion of the country aka the Metropolitan areas.

Most of these people just want to be left alone
I’d argue we only didn’t keep order in a few parts, and in those parts the Taliban remained influential enough to take back the country.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,466
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
618,046
Reppin
The Deep State
:sas2:


Why China is wary of opening up Afghanistan’s new road to Xinjiang
Published: 10:00pm, 26 Jan, 2024

The exact location of Afghanistan’s Little Pamir Road has not been disclosed, but it is understood to reach the Chinese border via the narrow and barely accessible strip of land called the Wakhan Corridor. Photo: AFP
The Taliban has completed its first road link between Afghanistan and China, but analysts expect Beijing to be cautious about giving its war-torn neighbour full access to its land border because of security concerns over terrorists and separatist militants.
At this stage, China has no customs facilities in the area – where Afghanistan meets the autonomous Chinese region of Xinjiang – and has said nothing to suggest it intends to add a formal crossing point.

Currently, only Chinese border guards patrol the Wakhjir Pass at the eastern end of the Wakhan Corridor, where the road is understood to be located.

The project – priced at around 370 million afghanis (US$5.07 million) – was conceived by the US-backed former government as a way to attract Chinese investment in the country’s untapped mining resources.

Construction began in May 2021 on the 50km (31-mile) Little Pamir Road in Badakhshan province but was soon suspended. Three months later, the Taliban retook control of the country.



How 2 years of Taliban rule have transformed Afghanistan back to the past

The 5 metre-wide road was completed around January 15, according to Mohammad Ayub Khalid, the Taliban governor of Badakhshan, in an interview with the Taliban-controlled Bakhtar News Agency. Asphalting would start “in the near future”, he said.

While Khalid gave no details of the road’s location, local travel agency manager Azim Ziahee said it reached the Chinese border via the Wakhjir Pass at the eastern end of the Wakhan Corridor – a barely accessible strip of land in the Pamir mountain range.

The former government had hopes that the road would link up with China’s vast network and boost commerce, imports and exports as well as cross-border transit.

Hong Kong Politics Newsletter

Latest news, analysis and opinion on politics in Hong Kong, covering Legco, John Lee’s administration and handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.

By submitting, you consent to receiving marketing emails from SCMP. If you don't want these, tick here

To the Taliban, it could pave the way for a more ambitious strategic corridor, connecting Afghanistan not only with China but also, in a wider reach, with Pakistan and central Asia’s Tajikistan.

According to Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, the plan was raised by acting foreign minister Amir Khan Mutaqi and other senior officials from the regime, on the sidelines of a forum in Tibet in October, with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

But while the road was “symbolic” for the Taliban, it was of little economic interest to Beijing, observers said.

Terror threat to Chinese in Afghanistan ‘is challenge to our own’, Taliban vows

6 Oct 2023


Zhu Yongbiao, a professor with the school of politics and international relations at Lanzhou University, said the project was more about the Taliban showing its neighbours that it could govern the country.

“The road itself is largely devoid of practical access and economic value,” he said, adding that Afghanistan did not have the capacity to build highways in the high-altitude Wakhan Corridor.

Zhu said China had no customs facilities in the area, had only frontier border guards deployed along the Wakhjir Pass, and was unlikely to step in with an investment. “It is not only too costly, [the road] will not bring any economic value in the short term.”

China considers the Wakhjir Pass to be a major counterterrorism front line between Afghanistan’s militants and Xinjiang, with its predominantly Muslim Uygur population.

‘Vested interests’: why China is backing Taliban regime in Afghanistan

26 Oct 2023


“China must have its security considerations. This road is not economically worthwhile, but it must have security risks,” Zhu said.

China has taken a cautious approach to the Taliban since the US military’s 2021 withdrawal from Kabul. Like the rest of the world, Beijing does not formally recognise the regime but is deeply worried about terrorism spilling into Xinjiang.

According to a UN Security Council report published in May 2020, the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) – a separatist group founded by militant Uygurs – had around 500 fighters in northern Afghanistan, mostly in Badakhshan province.

Beijing, which blames ETIM for a spate of violent attacks in Xinjiang, has repeatedly urged the Taliban to make more progress in combating terrorism, while also pledging to improve trade ties with Afghanistan.

Last year Beijing hosted several senior Taliban officials, including acting commerce minister Haji Nooruddin Azizi, who attended the belt and road forum in October that marked a decade of the massive infrastructure initiative.


China’s Belt and Road, 10 years on

In a sign of Beijing’s willingness to further engage with the Taliban, China posted an ambassador in Kabul in September – the first foreign envoy to be stationed in Afghanistan since the August 2021.

In a reciprocal move, the Taliban’s ambassador to China arrived in Beijing in December.

Abdul Basit, an associate fellow of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University, said China would face mounting pressure from local militants if it opened up access through the Wakhan Corridor.

“The areas adjoining the Wakhan Corridor also have the presence of militant groups … [China] will be confronted by the presence of ETIM in the Wakhan Corridor,” he said.
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
102,161
Reputation
4,944
Daps
204,034
Reppin
NULL

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,840
Reppin
the ether

was not aware tourism was in the cards for Afghanistan in 2024

:why:




They gotta get foreign currency somehow, and people will go anywhere.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,756
Reputation
8,234
Daps
157,296

Hafiz Rashid/

August 27, 2024/9:35 a.m. ET

Ex–Trump Adviser Drops Bombshell About Trump’s Taliban Deal​


H.R. McMaster is pointing to Donald Trump for the chaotic U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.​


H.R. McMaster


MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images

H.R. McMaster at a White House meeting on March 20, 2018, in Washington, D.C.

Donald Trump may have made the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan worse for President Biden.

General H.R. McMaster told CNN’s Anderson Cooper Monday night that Trump, while president, sought to negotiate with the Taliban as U.S. troops began leaving Afghanistan, which undermined the Afghan government. As a result, the U.S. government forced the Afghan government to release 5,000 members of the Taliban.
Cooper: The Trump Administration forced the Afghan government to release 5,000 Taliban?

McMaster: Correct. pic.twitter.com/Oq9Nd69G17

— Acyn (@Acyn) August 27, 2024


The former national security adviser was on CNN to discuss his new book, At War With Ourselves: My Tour of Duty in the Trump White House. The revelation puts the chaos of the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan into greater context, as conservatives sought to lay much of the blame onto Biden and successfully pushed that narrative into media coverage.

It’s the latest damaging revelation from McMaster’s book. Last week, an early excerpt from the book detailed how Russian autocrat Vladimir Putin was able to manipulate Trump by playing on his “ego and insecurities.” On Monday, another newly revealed excerpt described meetings in the Oval Office as “exercises in competitive sycophancy” where Trump made particularly “outlandish” suggestions, including one instance in which he asked, “Why don’t we just bomb the drugs?” in regards to narcotics in Mexico.

McMaster is one of many of Trump’s former national security officials to criticize the now convicted felon for his conduct as president. One of his other former national security advisers, John Bolton, said earlier this month that Trump “can’t tell the difference between what’s true and what’s false.”

Former White House chief of staff John Kelly has described the former president as “a person that has no idea what America stands for and has no idea what America is all about.… A person that has nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law. There is nothing more that can be said.”

“God help us.”
 
Top