don't speak for my people
who is weyou aint fooling nobody cac....quit spreading fallacies about AA/African history and go study your own in Caucasus cavenikka you dumb as shyt, we black americans 20% white due to the slave owners raping our ancestors dumbass.
that invisible forcefield is called the sahara desert
East Africans aint the same as west africans though so adding them to our heritage is dumb.
Nikka i don't believe the science of the white man... That's why you're a c00n.... You're inferiority prevents you from acknowleding your brethrens in EA ancient history... You don't see me shyting on WA ancient history... fukking c00n
The Neolithic Subpluvial, or the Holocene Wet Phase, was an extended period (from about 7500–7000 BCE to about 3500–3000 BCE) of wet and rainy conditions in the climate history of northern Africa. It was both preceded and followed by much drier periods.
The Neolithic Subpluvial was the most recent of a number of periods of "Wet Sahara" or "Green Sahara", during which the Sahara region was much more moist and supported a richer biota and human population than the present-day desert.
You claimed we're "Afrocentric" yet you're supposed to be a "real African"
who is weyou aint fooling nobody cac....quit spreading fallacies about AA/African history and go study your own in Caucasus cave
The Neolithic Subpluvial, or the Holocene Wet Phase, was an extended period (from about 7500–7000 BCE to about 3500–3000 BCE) of wet and rainy conditions in the climate history of northern Africa. It was both preceded and followed by much drier periods.
The Neolithic Subpluvial was the most recent of a number of periods of "Wet Sahara" or "Green Sahara", during which the Sahara region was much more moist and supported a richer biota and human population than the present-day desert.
Well it still kinda stopped them.
the peeps in the west accomplished a lot and have a great culture. But what you're saying isn't true; a lot of AAs do not attack this issue in respect to central/north east africans.AA's are sensitive because of their own history of cultural/historical erasure. They hate to see it happen to their fellow Africans.
AA's have a lot to be proud of given how much they've accomplished despite the cruelties inflicted upon them.
Finally, all Africans should be able to benefit from the cultural heritage of the continent. Similar to how a Norwegian talks about the European roots of democracy (from Greeks) or from the written word (from Phoenician script)
Like I said, I'm half Sudanese and half white. I'm a negroid and nothing else. Why? Because the traits that were dominant enough to come out is big lips, wide nose, and brown skin. To claim anything else would be self hating.