You asked someone if they thought the contract is bad.
I interjected and said yes and stated the reasons why I thought it was bad.
Your response is to say that my criteria for what is bad is not shared by others.
What exactly are you asking then, bruh?
I think a contract is bad within the context it exists. If youre paying someone 12 mill a year to operate out of position at the 3, I think that's bad value on the contract.
If you're paying someone 12 mil a year to play a position that they're best at, but in doing so, they're eating away at time that could be spent on cheaper prospects with potential when you're in the middle of a tank and have no realistic playoff aspirations I think that's bad value on the contract, within that context.
If you're asking if the contract is bad within the context of the league, no, it's not bad within the context of the league, but that doesn't mean shyt to me within the scope of the team becausethe rest ofthe leagueis not strungup ona contract for a guy not in our future. The Knicks are.
If you're asking if the contract is objectively bad, well, that's a deep ass conversation on a metaphysical level that I wasn't prepared to come across, let alone interject my 2 cents on.
So again, I ask - what exactly were you asking?