95% of African Civilization Is NOT Egyptian

Yagirlcheatinonus

Icon Poster
Bushed
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
10,265
Reputation
-200
Daps
16,798
Reppin
NULL
Thanks to everyone contributing to the thread. I wasn't trying to cause a rift really just wanted some understanding on Africa as a whole and where we descend from. Props to everyone kicking knowledge
 

DabbinSauce

Banned
Joined
May 25, 2015
Messages
886
Reputation
-240
Daps
1,700
I think I am being misunderstood here. I celebrate my direct ancestors. I'm not going to get into a historical tug if war over the remnants of Egypt.
You have just let these non-black trolls shame you into thinking learning about any African history outside of west African slavery is wrong, nothing more, nothing less
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
20,364
Reputation
6,335
Daps
101,061
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/sudan-a-black-nation.233368/

There was no successful Arab conquest of the Sudan or Sub-Sahara Africa as a whole. Its a myth that just wont die.

I am not speaking of the Sudan, because the Arabs were stopped by the archers out in the desert in the Sudan. I am speaking of Egypt. The Arabs did invade Egypt and they founded the City of Cairo.

As for Sub-Saharan Africa; then how do you explain Islam in Mali, Nigeria, Niger, etc. The Hausa people were and are Muslim. So are the Fulani people. So are the Bamoun people in Cameroon. Islam may not have taken hold in Sub Saharan African to the extent that it took hold in North Africa, but it had a landing spot.

Islam probably didn't take hold in all of Sub-Saharan Africa, because many people moved into the forest to avoid Islam. Those forest belt people to this day still engage in ancestor worship or Christianity.
 
Last edited:

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,513
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
I am not speaking of the Sudan, because the Arabs were stopped by the archers out in the desert in the Sudan. I am speaking of Egypt. The Arabs did invade Egypt and they founded the City of Cairo.

As for Sub-Saharan Africa; then how do you explain Islam in Mali, Nigeria, Niger, etc. The Hausa people were and are Muslim. So are the Fulani people. So are the Bamoun people in Cameroon. Islam may not have taken hold in Sub Saharan African to the extent that it took hold in North Africa, but it had a landing spot.

Islam probably didn't take hold in all of Sub-Saharan Africa, because many people moved into the forest to avoid Islam. Those forest belt people to this day still engage in ancestor worship or Christianity.

My bad for misinterpreting you. And yes Cairo/Delta region was a hub for foriegn migration whether peaceful or through invasion like the Arab conquest. Its comes to no surprise that the Delta is more densely populated compared to Upper Egypt which was more densely populated during the early dynastic periods.

As for the bolded and I noted this many times on here Islam came to the Western Sudan through mostly trade; mostly by Berbers. There is no evidence of any Arab invasion of Mali, Nigeria, Niger. And if you think so good luck finding any evidence. Now Islam further spread through Africa by force, but it wasn't by Arabs nut Fulani jihadist.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
20,364
Reputation
6,335
Daps
101,061
My bad for misinterpreting you. And yes Cairo/Delta region was a hub for foriegn migration whether peaceful or through invasion like the Arab conquest. Its comes to no surprise that the Delta is more densely populated compared to Upper Egypt which was more densely populated during the early dynastic periods.

As for the bolded and I noted this many times on here Islam came to the Western Sudan through mostly trade; mostly by Berbers. There is no evidence of any Arab invasion of Mali, Nigeria, Niger. And if you think so good luck finding any evidence. Now Islam further spread through Africa by force, but it wasn't by Arabs nut Fulani jihadist.

Wikipedia is not a good source for information, but I wanted to check up on the Islam dynasties of the Almoravids and the Almohads. The Almoravids did capture the Kingdom of Ghana and its trade routes. Mali in turn was founded by some of the defeated Ghanaians, but even then it looks like they were trade partners with the Berbers; who later founded the Almohad Dynasty. Here is a written account of the matter:

"The western Sanhaja had been converted to Islam some time in the 9th century. They were subsequently united in the 10th century and, with the zeal of neophyte converts, launched several campaigns against the "Sudanese" (pagan peoples of sub-Saharan Africa).[13] Under their king Tinbarutan ibn Usfayshar, the Sanhaja Lamtuna erected (or captured) the citadel of Awdaghust, a critical stop on the trans-Saharan trade route. After the collapse of the Sanhaja union, Awdagust passed over to the Ghana empire; and the trans-Saharan routes were taken over by the Zenata Maghrawa of Sijilmassa. The Maghrawa also exploited this disunion to dislodge the Sanhaja Gazzula and Lamta out of their pasturelands in the Sous and Draa valleys. Around 1035, the Lamtuna chieftain Abu Abdallah Muhammad ibn Tifat (alias Tarsina), tried to reunite the Sanhaja desert tribes, but his reign lasted less than three years... ."

...

Ghana Empire and the southern wing[
edit]
According to Arab tradition, the Almoravids conquered the Ghana Empire sometime around 1075 CE.[20] Conrad and Fisher (1982) argued that the notion of any Almoravid military conquest at its core is merely perpetuated folklore, derived from a misinterpretation or naive reliance on Arabic sources.[21] Dierke Lange agrees but argues that this doesn't preclude Almoravid political agitation, claiming that Ghana's demise owed much to the latter.[22]This interpretation of events was countered by later scholars like S. Burkhalater, who argued that, whatever the nature of the "conquest" in the south, the influence and success of the almoravids in securing West Africa Gold and curcylating it widely necessitated a high degree of political control. Burkhalter suggests that the Almoravid who led the expedition to conquer Ghana was none other Abu Bakr’s son Yahya.[23] Furthermore, the archaeology of ancient Ghana simply does not show the signs of rapid change and destruction that would be associated with any Almoravid-era military conquests.[24]

The ensuing war pushed Ghana over the edge, ending the kingdom's position as a commercial and military power by 1100. It collapsed into tribal groups and chieftaincies, some of which later assimilated into the Almoravids while others founded the Mali Empire. However, the Almoravid religious influence was gradual and not heavily involved in military strife; there the Almoravids increased in power by marrying among the nation's nobility. Scholars such as Dierk Lange attribute the decline of ancient Ghana to numerous unrelated factors, only one of which can be likely attributable to internal dynastic struggles that were instigated by Almoravid influence and Islamic pressures, but devoid of any military conversion and conquest.[25]
After the dead of Abu Bakr, the confederation of berber tribes disitegrated and lost the control upon Ghana.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almoravid_dynasty


My thinking is warfare to spread Islam was not required to capture the remaining part of Sub Saharan Africa, because it could probably be spread easier through trade; however Ghana was sacked by Muslim. Moreover Islam is still being pushed in the Sudan, Chad and in Nigeria through this day; some by use of violence.
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,720
Reputation
10,770
Daps
123,654
Africa is my home

Wdp_lilostitch_lilo_420x420_001.jpg

Ain't you maori? What are you talking about, Lilo?
 
Last edited:
Top