I see there seems to be a reading comprehension hurdle...let me try to help... Can you refer to any statement of mine that mentions “Brogdons injury log” sir or are we going to continue this trolling act just to avoid stating the obvious.... That ain't beating the NetsHalf the thread it saying don't take Brogdon because of injuries. If injuries matter for him they matter for the team you keep bringing up. That trio can be a depleted Nets We can go as long as you need to
Low key they should take it.
To put into perspective how bad Simmons is:
Even with his vaunted defense, Trae Young still adjusted and averaged 30 points that series. When you combine that with Simmons's horrific offensive play (including game 6, where his numerous missed free throws aided in them blowing that lead as he couldn't score), you could argue that sthey were better off not even playing him. Letting go of Simmons is addition by subtraction in the playoffs.
Like, literally just replacing him with a guy that can score on the outside, even if they are not that great at it, is fine. Doing that will help the floor spacing dramatically, make it easier for Embiid (and he'll turn the ball over less), and help the team late in games preserve leads (as you can't play Hack Simmons).
Simmons for Draymond, Andrew Wiggins and a 1st rd pick
CP3/Curry/Dame is not being exchanged for Simmons. I don't care what you said, you're lock-step with posters who think they need to pass on Brogdon due to injury as if All-Pro point guards are within reach.I see there seems to be a reading comprehension hurdle...let me try to help... Can you refer to any statement of mine that mentions “Brogdons injury log” sir or are we going to continue this trolling act just to avoid stating the obvious.... That ain't beating the Nets
Which is why you're reduced to posting incoherent babble instead of sticking to the facts...thats ACTUAL trolling... My point is that the team with the Brogdan wouldn't elevate them beyond the elite of their conference which supposedly isn't he whole reason to trade Ben in the first place...nothing to do with “injury logs” or whatever nonsense you're trying to make up... If you believe making a trade just to make a trade is wise that's your prerogative but it doesn't change the facts of my observation.... If you would have actually got out of your feelings of wanting to be right so bad this conversation could have been had clarityCP3/Curry/Dame is not being exchanged for Simmons. I don't care what you said, you're lock-step with posters who think they need to pass on Brogdon due to injury as if All-Pro point guards are within reach.
There is no immediate quick fix answer...this isn't a video game... Which is why their mentality should be to get as large of a package for Ben as possible because you may need to use those assets for a secondary or tertiary move in the future to actually get that so called missing link for embiid... Deals like the Brogdon one will always be on the table as long as Ben is healthySo what is your answer to the Sixers problems if you can't get over the fact that nobody is beating a 2K team?
It will alway be on the table because a better caliber of player is not being commanded by a 180M point guard who can't play 4th quarters. You throwing in "can't beat Nets" is a smart ass way of saying you incorrectly believe a broken overpaid player is more valuable than you think because you already know there's no move for any Eastern team to make if KD-Harden-Kyrie are all healthy next May.Which is why you're reduced to posting incoherent babble instead of sticking to the facts...thats ACTUAL trolling... My point is that the team with the Brogdan wouldn't elevate them beyond the elite of their conference which supposedly isn't he whole reason to trade Ben in the first place...nothing to do with “injury logs” or whatever nonsense you're trying to make up... If you believe making a trade just to make a trade is wise that's your prerogative but it doesn't change the facts of my observation.... If you would have actually got out of your feelings of wanting to be right so bad this conversation could have been had clarity
There is no immediate quick fix answer...this isn't a video game... Which is why their mentality should be to get as large of a package for Ben as possible because you may need to use those assets for a secondary or tertiary move in the future to actually get that so called missing link for embiid... Deals like the Brogdon one will always be on the table as long as Ben is healthy
Trading Simmons for Malcolm Brogdon is terrible
It will alway be on the table because a better caliber of player is not being commanded by a 180M point guard who can't play 4th quarters.
You throwing in "can't beat Nets" is a smart ass way of saying you incorrectly believe a broken overpaid player is more valuable than you think because you already know there's no move for any Eastern team to make if KD-Harden-Kyrie are all healthy next May.
There's no "incoherent babble" here.
The Nets are a bridge to be crossed later.
Trading Simmons for Malcolm Brogdon is terrible
I'd rather keep Simmons then give him away for that trash kind of offer.
I tried to tell him that when i bump the rockets trade harden to nets thread.. 76ers tried to fukk the rockets over@Shadow King
The sooner you accept the fact that different people/ coaches / front office members value players differently than your personal opinions.. The better your basketball takes will be brother
Stay Blessed