Austin Butler shock win
Her: "You wanna go see Women Talking?!"Least appealing movie title ever
I think it's an open secret that the Academy Awards is based more on backstage politics than the actual talent behind or in front of the camera.I have a friend who works on these Oscar campaigns, and the Times just did an expose on the process of buying Oscasr nods and wins, the whole thing is just like a political campaign.
I don't think any of the movies I really liked last year were nominated, understandably so, I saw a few, Banshees, Tar, off the top of my head, but a lot just don't appeal to me, The Fabelmans, Michelle Williams I really lie, but I can't watch this. They all follow generally such a safe formula of retro conservative messages with progressive trappings, not too much violence, not too much sex, they are very safe. Triangle Of Sadness is a mess of a movie, and should not be anywhere near anything, that's the Academy signaling "eat the rich" values, that's their nod to progressivism. Empire of Light deserves that nod, Roger Deacons did great work there.
my favorites:
Emily The Criminal
Bardo (or is that nominated)
Stars At Noon
A Chiara
Sundown
Bones And All
I think it's an open secret that the Academy Awards is based more on backstage politics than the actual talent behind or in front of the camera.
That's why I'm surprised when a Moonlight or Parasite wins Best Picture because they normally wouldn't touch those type of movies.
What do you think about EEAAO?Right, those are exceptions proving the rule, actually brilliant and subversive movies, that don't follow a formula, purer artistic expression I guess
What do you think about EEAAO?
It follows the subversive movie path, and it's favored to win best picture
It's on Showtime, maybe you can get a free trialI didn't see, probably a mistake, but I think it's a legit movie, every so often the get it right, like you referenced, as in Moonlight and Parasite
What do you think about EEAAO?
It follows the subversive movie path, and it's favored to win best picture
I have a friend who works on these Oscar campaigns, and the Times just did an expose on the process of buying Oscasr nods and wins, the whole thing is just like a political campaign.
I don't think any of the movies I really liked last year were nominated, understandably so, I saw a few, Banshees, Tar, off the top of my head, but a lot just don't appeal to me, The Fabelmans, Michelle Williams I really lie, but I can't watch this. They all follow generally such a safe formula of retro conservative messages with progressive trappings, not too much violence, not too much sex, they are very safe. Triangle Of Sadness is a mess of a movie, and should not be anywhere near anything, that's the Academy signaling "eat the rich" values, that's their nod to progressivism. Empire of Light deserves that nod, Roger Deacons did great work there.
Just look at the best picture list and the values espoused by those movies, you get patriotism, (Top Gun) family, (Fabelmans) weak willed nods to "Occupy The Oscars", (Trinage Of Sadness) and war is bad but necessary. So predictable.
my favorites:
Emily The Criminal
Bardo (or is that nominated)
Stars At Noon
A Chiara
Sundown
Bones And All