-Exit polls have been suspiciously unreliable since 2016, as if they became guesswork overnight
-Bernie won the popular vote in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada. This is historical. It's never been done before in US history because those three states have drastically different cultures and no presidential candidate has ever appeased all three. It's part of why they get used as metrics to predict future candidates. Bernie wins all three....and suddenly these once reliable metrics are outliers and all the states that followed disagree with them...?
-Biden has dementia. I'm sorry, I know it can be hard to say because honestly it's hard to watch him, but he's at the beginning of a cognitive decline that's only going to get worse. I refuse to believe anyone that's watched ANY of the debates is enthusiastic about voting for the guy. Dude somehow jumped from like 4th place and struggling to get double-digits to being the front-runner...? Bare in mind some of these states saw drastic flips from 2016, when they DID vote for Bernie.
-Go look at the Iowa coin tosses and how they were conducted. That's two vids you can find showing suspiciously bias coin tosses, and we know Buttigieg donated to the company that made the app. Do we really think the corruption was just an isolated issue in Iowa...?
-Why should we believe that 2016 was corrupt as shyt but 2020 is clean? Only difference between 2016 and now is now we don't have Wikileaks spelling it out for us and showing us every detail of the corruption.
-
This video. You can actually find the same woman making the same claims years ago. tl;dw is sometimes people get handed a "paper ballot" that has a QR code on it. The QR code is all that gets read by the machines, so even if it says "Bernie" on it, we cannot guarentee the code is a vote for Bernie. There is zero way to verify the vote. Only the DNC has access to the machines. She also mentions that when doable, they'll choose to steal votes from
other candidates rather than Bernie, as it means the
other candidate has to file a complaint. She names that during one of the votes she and her team watched Steyer's ballot count tick downwards. Thing is, why would Steyer bother complaining? That costs money, and he knows he's not winning either way. Bernie can't complain either since it's not his votes that were stolen.
-The DNC flat-out said last time it's in their legal right to rig the election
-Honestly, Bloomberg got up on stage despite not qualifying, whereas Tulsi was excluded (multiple times) despite qualifying? Simple: Bloomberg paid, and with Tulsi they know she's practically Bernie's right-hand and often more aggressive than he is. They want Bloomberg on stage, they don't want Tulsi. Has nothing to do with rules and everything to do with who they want.
-Polling stations consistently shut down amongst younger demographics.
-And of course, the media bias. FFS there were soooooooooooo many examples of polls or simple graphics where they misrepresented Bernie. They'd list the front-runners by support - cept Bernie - who was stuck at the bottom despite having the highest support. They'd sometimes just forget to put a pic up of him when showing photos of all the candidates. This is no simple mistake.
