JoogJoint

In my own league.
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
14,265
Reputation
1,641
Daps
40,408
Reppin
Outer Space
I don't think it's fair to just call her wonkish. She's also better than him at articulating how she will implement her policies. This helps ease some of the tension some have about revolutionary change and why she doesn't get labeled as crazy. For example, the way she in a professorial way explained how she would pay for the student debt cancellation by increasing taxes on ultra millionaires 2 cents on the dollar was simple to understand and reasonable.

The way she also attacks race head on is extremely endearing and a huge red flag for Bernie. I'm surprised Nina Turner hasn't slapped some sense into him.

This is what I was talking to my mom about it. Either Nina, Killer Mike, or Cornell West or some influential Black person around him needs to sit him down and talk with him about how to answer these questions better with Black people. Even though Bernie is doing well with Black Americans compared to the other candidates, he still struggles knowing how to talk with us like he does with everybody else.

He's always on this "All Lives Matter" or including every Tom, dikk, and Harry in everything we've asked him or some inclusion B.S. that he wouldn't pull with other groups of people.

He needs some of those Black people around him to call his ass out on it.

He doesn't have to court the White working class or other groups at OUR expense and he needs somebody around him, not the White progressives, to tell him that.
 

dtownreppin214

l'immortale
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,985
Reputation
10,617
Daps
192,779
Reppin
Shags & Leathers
No candidate attacks race head on but Elizabeth Warren. She has everyone beat there on how to map out a plan. Castro has given slight nods to reparations. As far as being labeled crazy, Warren has this area to operate because Sanders created this space in 2016. She undercuts him by actually explaining it but that is what separates her from any other candidate in the past 20 years. She is uniquely talented at explaining policy. Sanders isn't giving any less detail than Obama did in 08 or Clinton in 92, etc. It's just that LIz is sitting there with a new mixtape every week. My point is, the shots you take at Sanders could apply to basically every candidate except Warren including all of the prior Democratic nominees since losing to Bush in 88.

The difference is that Sanders is commited to being more left than any of them. Also, it's basic politics. The frontrunners never give specifics until they are forced to. Sanders had to defend his tuition-free college and medicare for all plans last time around because he was the leftist challenger. No one is challenging him on how to pay for them this time (partially because there is a bill). Sanders definitely stumbles on race though. It's clear that he is remembering bullet points.
Warren is operating in a space Sanders created in '16 but Sanders is also benefiting heavily by running in '16. He was able to build a cult of followers off the hatred and disdain for Hillary Clinton. That gave him a head start on fundraising and name recognition over Warren. It's probably the only thing separating the two right now because Warren on paper is the better candidate. If Warren ran in '16 she'd probably be in the lead right now.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,160
Reppin
The Deep State
Top