AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,180
Reputation
2,804
Daps
67,809
Reppin
New York
Bernie bros would save themselves a lot of key strokes by just saying yet again just like 2016 if the candidate is not their lord and savior the infallible mr sanders, the candidate is a threat to democracy, a fraud and a neoliberal shill.
No one is saying that tho. I still like Elizabeth Warren but I can also acknowledge when she is messing up in her campaign. How about you? :francis:
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
14,822
Reputation
4,393
Daps
41,692
Or she could have endorsed Bernie instead of Hillary in 2016. lol That was actually completely in her control. Now after that you act like Progressives have no reason to not trust her? That disingenuous, sorry.
Now Elizabeth wants to be on the Progressive team in 2020 and act like you and Bernie are on the same page? We need proof since you betrayed Bernie in 2016. And backing off M4A and acting like your Amy Klobuchar now isn't it Elizabeth. :francis:
1) She didn't endorse Hillary over Bernie in 2016. She withheld her endorsement until a winner was clear. Very different things.

2) This gets to the point of what I'm saying. Elizabeth Warren's entire history of jumping into the trenches and doggedly fighting the progressive fight against both Republicans and her own incredibly popular President and party is ignored, and her progressive bonafides are wiped away because she refused to nuke her political capital/career by endorsing what was admittedly a protest candidacy by a relatively obscure Senator from Vermont. Setting up the CFPB and single-handedly stopping Summers and Geithner from consolidating more political power amongst the financial elite apparently pale in comparison to a single ungiven primary endorsement. This is how mass movements become cults of personality. The progressive movement is larger than Bernie. It doesn't live and die by his dictates and whims. Centering him to this degree is unhealthy.
 

storyteller

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
16,046
Reputation
4,915
Daps
61,023
Reppin
NYC
Maybe I'm having a brain fart but where does he say Jacobin left?

But yes, the American left is simply the mainstream, MSNBC, New York Times, Democratic voter. It's not based on any level of class, gender, race, international solidarity. It's not a theory of politics. It's just a party identifier.

This is the Rising interview I was referencing. Right about Five minutes in Krystal says that the Jacobin Left is pretty critical of Obama and Stoller says "no they're not" then flips it to not taking responsibility for voting in Obama.


Here's a 2011 piece where they literally point out that Progressives projected on Obama but were wrong.
Dancing on Liberalism’s Grave

Then Stoller moves on to asking when Bernie has ever criticized Obama. Ball says "this past weekend" and provides an example. At which point Stoller wants Bernie to flat out say "Obama was a bad president" which is a pretty blatant goal post move. He gets caught out AGAIN trying to say you "just don't listen to centrists, they're saying the same thing (I'm paraphrasing)" and then Ball mentions that they've interviewed No Labels and Third Way Reps with nothing close to the same critiques. Stoller whiffed there.
 
Last edited:

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,587
Biden has some real fukking stinkers on his record (crime bill, protecting corporations over voters re: bankruptcy, oh uhh the fukkING WAR IN IRAQ, etc). His batting average is way worse than hers. :unimpressed:

you love to post his losses but not his wins? Which are 3-4x more than his bad votes?

besides the Iraq war, which no one cares about now bush is gone.

he and Bernie have the best ideas to fix the crime bills wrongs. Why is warren avoiding the crack/coke discrepancy while being a progressive?
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,587
Bernie bros would save themselves a lot of key strokes by just saying yet again just like 2016 if the candidate is not their lord and savior the infallible mr sanders, the candidate is a threat to democracy, a fraud and a neoliberal shill.

that’s bc the first supporters and leaders of the movement hated the dnc to begin with. They want it all to burn. They’ll never commit to an institution they hate.

the rest of the Bernie bro’s just follow em
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,180
Reputation
2,804
Daps
67,809
Reppin
New York
1) She didn't endorse Hillary over Bernie in 2016. She withheld her endorsement until a winner was clear. Very different things.

2) This gets to the point of what I'm saying. Elizabeth Warren's entire history of jumping into the trenches and doggedly fighting the progressive fight against both Republicans and her own incredibly popular President and party is ignored, and her progressive bonafides are wiped away because she refused to nuke her political capital/career by endorsing what was admittedly a protest candidacy by a relatively obscure Senator from Vermont. Setting up the CFPB and single-handedly stopping Summers and Geithner from consolidating more political power amongst the financial elite apparently pale in comparison to a single ungiven primary endorsement. This is how mass movements become cults of personality. The progressive movement is larger than Bernie. It doesn't live and die by his dictates and whims. Centering him to this degree is unhealthy.
Uh, did you see my post after the one you quoted? I said I still liked her, I'm just saying she is making mistakes on this M4A issue while running for president.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
14,822
Reputation
4,393
Daps
41,692
Uh, did you see my post after the one you quoted? I said I still liked her, I'm just saying she is making mistakes on this M4A issue while running for president.
The "mistake" she made was daring to stand in the way of Bernie. That was the real unforgivable act. But because people want to commit to the veneer of impartiality and hold on to the idea that they're not caught up in a cult of personality (much like how Obama's defenders are) they have to constantly shift the goalposts about how whatever new thing Warren does is disastrous.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,660
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,816
Reppin
The Deep State
Or she could have endorsed Bernie instead of Hillary in 2016. lol That was actually completely in her control. Now after that you act like Progressives have no reason to not trust her? That disingenuous, sorry.
Now Elizabeth wants to be on the Progressive team in 2020 and act like you and Bernie are on the same page? We need proof since you betrayed Bernie in 2016. And backing off M4A and acting like your Amy Klobuchar now isn't it Elizabeth. :francis:
Warren endorsed Clinton after sanders was mathematically eliminated. MONTHS before the DNC convention why would she waste her endorsement?
 

storyteller

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
16,046
Reputation
4,915
Daps
61,023
Reppin
NYC
No it was being wishy washy on M4A. But believe what you want.

And the goal post moving has been to fold in the Warren red flags as perfectly fine and completely above any critique rather than either debating them or just agreeing to disagree on what the best strategy is.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
14,822
Reputation
4,393
Daps
41,692
No it was being wishy washy on M4A. But believe what you want.
She was getting heaps of shyt when her position was literally just "I'm with Bernie", so I'm not sure how that tracks. Back then the goalposts were that she refused to say she would raise taxes and was somehow sabotaging the movement by doing so. Then she doubles down on full M4A, and does it without raising taxes on the working class, and the goalposts shifted to a head tax being disastrous and she's sabotaging the movement. Now she releases a transition plan that gets to M4A in 3 years and the goalposts shifted to a 2-step transition is disastrous because it's inevitable that Republicans will win the 2022 midterms and full M4A can somehow be passed in the current political climate within 2 years. :coffee:
 
Top