Norrin Radd
To me, my board!
I wonder what @Kevin_Nash has to say about this
click....clique....cliq...kliqI wonder what @Kevin_Nash has to say about this
I hit find on page on my browser and typed in 750 million...i didnt find it...so this list is invalid
Its ok to blame every other wrestler for downtimes in the business and lack of opponents or devauling by the company by making them secondary to certain company main eventerd but when bryan has legit a terrible wwe championship runand the conpany loses 750 million while hes champ it doesnt fall under this same umbrella
It was like if Austin was trying to be the man but HBK or Bret was main eventing every show and being positioned as the face of the company . A lot of these examples are flawed because if you compare the buy rights of one year and then say next year well the other draws are out but it's the champs fault is silly . Austins run was great but he got such a great villain in Vince , the rock come up is kind of more impressive that was able to recover from die rocky die hateI'll always feel like the think that happened with Punk was post Pipe Bomb, he really was "The One To Watch" in WWE.
Folks deny it, but there's been no bigger draw since Austin than the story of "The Regular Slobby Looking/Acting/Talking Dude vs The Corporate Machine Or Whatever Represents It"
WWE misses this point by always having the Corporation pick on these pretty boy square jawed babyfaces, but I digress...
Anyway, I saw it as Punk leveraging that fame in his contract renegotiations and one of the stipulations was that he was champ for a determined length of time.
Vince or whoever, being tired of his shyt, gave him the belt..... but booked Cena as champ.
Its ok to blame every other wrestler for downtimes in the business and lack of opponents or devauling by the company by making them secondary to certain company main eventerd but when bryan has legit a terrible wwe championship runand the conpany loses 750 million while hes champ it doesnt fall under this same umbrella
Only guys on this list i legit thought were terrible draws were miz and nash
Nash fidnt become a draw until wcw but miz has never been a draw
Hes the jeff jarrett of the new era except the wwe finally realized this after they tried to cash jn on some nonexistent real world road rules fame
The list is bullshyt.. Greenfield, headwriter on Smackdown in 2004-2006, said Eddie was mainly responsible for Smackdown's successful ratings during that time.A lot of yall have some explaining to do with Sid and Eddie being champ.....
Bryan had a grand total of one month on TV as the WWE champion, and he didn't even appear on Raw for half of that. Get the fukk outta here with your third grade troll logic. WWE lost money because they gassed up stockholders and overestimated how many casual fans would be interested in the Network.Its ok to blame every other wrestler for downtimes in the business and lack of opponents or devauling by the company by making them secondary to certain company main eventerd but when bryan has legit a terrible wwe championship runand the conpany loses 750 million while hes champ it doesnt fall under this same umbrella
Only guys on this list i legit thought were terrible draws were miz and nash
Nash fidnt become a draw until wcw but miz has never been a draw
Hes the jeff jarrett of the new era except the wwe finally realized this after they tried to cash jn on some nonexistent real world road rules fame