I definitely didn’t appreciate how central to the movie tommy lee jone’s character was the first time I watched this which might’ve explained my original disappointment with the ending…
He's even more central to the book. One of the main differences between the movie and the book is that they cut out much of the contemplation narrative by the sheriff, which makes sense cause otherwise the movie would drag.
or at least I think I remember not liking the ending…I feel like anton’s car crash was a bit too “distracting”…would’ve been more poignant imo if he just simply got away but idk…I guess maybe they wanted to leave the viewers with some “hope” that maybe the police eventually caught him…I’ll hit google and see if there’s any specific reason for including that accident or if it was just meant to be completely random…great movie…glad I rewatched it…enjoyed it more as an “old” man lol
My interpretation of the ending is that Anton represents the inevitability of bad shyt happening, how impossible it is to dodge fate/violence that the world has become. But Cormac wanted you to understand that Anton was subject to that same inevitability as well, just because he represented that overwhelming darkness in the movie doesn't mean that he's somehow immune to it. It helps extend the universality of the message from one story to something more universal.