How could anyone possibly think that these were good examples? Embarrassing shyt
No duh, that's the point. Embarrasing just like the original video
10 hours of walking in NYC as a woman
- Thread starter Czerka
- Start date
No duh, that's the point. Embarrasing just like the original video
The one dude who was walking and smiling like he thought they were going for a stroll or something was a little off (he could have very well been taking the same path as her though), but none of this extended beyond verbal communication. For this to be labelled as harassment is an insult to victims of real harassment. Do some women hate verbal comments? Of course. Then, there are others who love it and complain when they don't get it. It's always going to be one way or the other, excluding women who don't care about things like this. Also, if you fail to see the social and racial implications of the video, then you already lost; this is especially true for Black and Latino men.
I said it to someone else, I think. Touching, following, etc.
"Who knows what a conversation can lead to?" In NYC, you learn fast that 9,999,999,999 times out of 10,000,000,000 that if someone on the street is approaching you for a "conversation", they want something. Money, sex, or just to waste your time. Why are women obligated to stop and talk to every man who says something to them?
If people don't want to be talked to, people don't want to be talked to. This shyt is in the same vein as solicitation (i.e. Amnesty International people approaching for donations) and panhandling IMO... sure its generally harmless, but its a nuisance, and people shouldn't be demonized or shamed for not wanting to be subjected to it all the time out of some bullshyt common courtesy.
I didnt know her. I saw her once, TWICE MAYBE in class and I tried a ting. That was it. I met her on the street fukkboy.Well for starters, how old are you and these chicks? The street game is totally different for kids. But lets break it down.
I would say public in general.
So in other words, u knew her and had a mutual context (school). So u approached her on the street, but u didn't meet her on the street. Thats not the same at all. She already knew u.
Again, yall live in the same neighborhood. I would not be surprised if yall had been seeing each other before u approached her.
If it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>, why have only a quarter of the girls u fukked been bagged that way? How else are u meeting women? Whats your success rate with those methods vs the street approach?
Age is 23. Girls I bag range from 20-24.
The muslim chick was 20...the jamaican chick i smashed was a year older (23 when i was 22)
Never seen her before in my life.Like I said...its fun. You can read...it isnt the sole method to meet women but 25% is a good percentage. A quarter isnt a solid chunk now?
NYC nikkas dont talk to strangers breh, I lived there 28 years, its never "just as simple as that"
Dudes want to fukk, period. Lets just call a spade a spade and stop pretending like these guys are "just being friendly"
I wouldnt go as far as to say women look at unsuitable men as "subhuman filth", but again, why should women be obligated to deal with men they deem mediocre?
mcdivit85
Superstar
This b#tch needs to have several seats with this bullsh#t.
First: It's "street harassment" because most of the dudes giving her any attention are black and hispanic. I didn't notice white dudes even taking a look at her. Something tells me if she was walking on Wall Street and a white dude in a suit said "have a nice day" she wouldn't feel so violated. Plus, she's walking through lower socioeconomic neighborhoods. Broke men tend to be extra thirsty. She knows this, which is why she chose those neighborhoods to walk through. A "round the way" chick like her would be invisible on Wall Street or Park Ave.
Second: This video is about men going out of their way to objectify this woman based on her physique. Yet this chick wears tight jeans showing off said physique. I can see if the chick was wearing a flowing skirt or something less tight. But the chick, any most chicks, wear the sh#t that they know is going to catch attention but then get upset when dudes are giving them the attention that comes with wearing tight jeans.
Third: This does more to show how thirsty dudes are then anything about this chick being in danger. This chick was not being followed or touched or assaulted. This woman was receiving cat calls, some "damn" and mostly "have nice day." Yea, are dudes doing it as a hopeful segue? Yes, but is that a crime? Is that something that even warrants attention? No.
If I could make it so, I would have dudes take a week long sabbatical on approaching women. No conversation, no holding of doors, no favors because she's a woman and/or pretty, no dates, no money being spent.....nothing for a whole week.
Let these chicks feel the weight of being ignored and without male attention for awhile. The same chicks talking that "harassment" sh#t would be begging for some dude to simply acknowledge her presence. A big component of this phenomenon is the pumpkinheadness that comes with 2014 feminism....the idea that men are so enthralled by women that the female gender is in constant danger of assault due to the uncontrollable male libido.
I blame these cupcake a## n#ggas who always giving these pumpkinhead b#tches breaks. Resthaven n#ggas giving women undue attention and confidence. Dudes giving these women air to breathe, so they can formulate these nut ideas.
But people will watch this video without peeping the context of it. Like I said, this woman intentionally chose the neighborhoods she walked through as a bias for the video. She knows that her "round the way" vibe would be NOTHING in more prosperour areas. She also knows that black and hispanic men are easy targets for this propoganda.
And let's be real....this chick is average. Which only proves my point about her choosing which neighborhoods to walk through.
Peace
First: It's "street harassment" because most of the dudes giving her any attention are black and hispanic. I didn't notice white dudes even taking a look at her. Something tells me if she was walking on Wall Street and a white dude in a suit said "have a nice day" she wouldn't feel so violated. Plus, she's walking through lower socioeconomic neighborhoods. Broke men tend to be extra thirsty. She knows this, which is why she chose those neighborhoods to walk through. A "round the way" chick like her would be invisible on Wall Street or Park Ave.
Second: This video is about men going out of their way to objectify this woman based on her physique. Yet this chick wears tight jeans showing off said physique. I can see if the chick was wearing a flowing skirt or something less tight. But the chick, any most chicks, wear the sh#t that they know is going to catch attention but then get upset when dudes are giving them the attention that comes with wearing tight jeans.
Third: This does more to show how thirsty dudes are then anything about this chick being in danger. This chick was not being followed or touched or assaulted. This woman was receiving cat calls, some "damn" and mostly "have nice day." Yea, are dudes doing it as a hopeful segue? Yes, but is that a crime? Is that something that even warrants attention? No.
If I could make it so, I would have dudes take a week long sabbatical on approaching women. No conversation, no holding of doors, no favors because she's a woman and/or pretty, no dates, no money being spent.....nothing for a whole week.
Let these chicks feel the weight of being ignored and without male attention for awhile. The same chicks talking that "harassment" sh#t would be begging for some dude to simply acknowledge her presence. A big component of this phenomenon is the pumpkinheadness that comes with 2014 feminism....the idea that men are so enthralled by women that the female gender is in constant danger of assault due to the uncontrollable male libido.
I blame these cupcake a## n#ggas who always giving these pumpkinhead b#tches breaks. Resthaven n#ggas giving women undue attention and confidence. Dudes giving these women air to breathe, so they can formulate these nut ideas.
But people will watch this video without peeping the context of it. Like I said, this woman intentionally chose the neighborhoods she walked through as a bias for the video. She knows that her "round the way" vibe would be NOTHING in more prosperour areas. She also knows that black and hispanic men are easy targets for this propoganda.
And let's be real....this chick is average. Which only proves my point about her choosing which neighborhoods to walk through.
Peace
Do you honestly think that these guys are saying hello to the old Asian dude and Johnny Hipster?
Why should men deal with mediocre women with bad attitudes?
Where did I say thatlol we got this fukkboy @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! saying its better meeting girls on OKCupid/Online then in real life
What the hell is going on in here?
U tell me, u are the one advocating for them to do be able to do exactly that
