Yea, maybemaybe i'm mistaking you for somebody else in the thread you just made.
![aicmon :aicmon: :aicmon:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/A1Bny.png)
Yea, maybemaybe i'm mistaking you for somebody else in the thread you just made.
NYC nikkas dont talk to strangers breh, I lived there 28 years, its never "just as simple as that"
Dudes want to fukk, period. Lets just call a spade a spade and stop pretending like these guys are "just being friendly"
just cause i say good morning to some chick i dont know doesnt mean i wanna fukk her
This b#tch needs to have several seats with this bullsh#t.
First: It's "street harassment" because most of the dudes giving her any attention are black and hispanic. I didn't notice white dudes even taking a look at her. Something tells me if she was walking on Wall Street and a white dude in a suit said "have a nice day" she wouldn't feel so violated. Plus, she's walking through lower socioeconomic neighborhoods. Broke men tend to be extra thirsty. She knows this, which is why she chose those neighborhoods to walk through. A "round the way" chick like her would be invisible on Wall Street or Park Ave.
Second: This video is about men going out of their way to objectify this woman based on her physique. Yet this chick wears tight jeans showing off said physique. I can see if the chick was wearing a flowing skirt or something less tight. But the chick, any most chicks, wear the sh#t that they know is going to catch attention but then get upset when dudes are giving them the attention that comes with wearing tight jeans.
Third: This does more to show how thirsty dudes are then anything about this chick being in danger. This chick was not being followed or touched or assaulted. This woman was receiving cat calls, some "damn" and mostly "have nice day." Yea, are dudes doing it as a hopeful segue? Yes, but is that a crime? Is that something that even warrants attention? No.
If I could make it so, I would have dudes take a week long sabbatical on approaching women. No conversation, no holding of doors, no favors because she's a woman and/or pretty, no dates, no money being spent.....nothing for a whole week.
Let these chicks feel the weight of being ignored and without male attention for awhile. The same chicks talking that "harassment" sh#t would be begging for some dude to simply acknowledge her presence. A big component of this phenomenon is the pumpkinheadness that comes with 2014 feminism....the idea that men are so enthralled by women that the female gender is in constant danger of assault due to the uncontrollable male libido.
I blame these cupcake a## n#ggas who always giving these pumpkinhead b#tches breaks. Resthaven n#ggas giving women undue attention and confidence. Dudes giving these women air to breathe, so they can formulate these nut ideas.
But people will watch this video without peeping the context of it. Like I said, this woman intentionally chose the neighborhoods she walked through as a bias for the video. She knows that her "round the way" vibe would be NOTHING in more prosperour areas. She also knows that black and hispanic men are easy targets for this propoganda.
And let's be real....this chick is average. Which only proves my point about her choosing which neighborhoods to walk through.
Peace
No doubt. And this shyt is especially a no go in NYC with all the problems black men have with the NYPD. bytch is an attention whore for sure.This b#tch needs to have several seats with this bullsh#t.
First: It's "street harassment" because most of the dudes giving her any attention are black and hispanic. I didn't notice white dudes even taking a look at her. Something tells me if she was walking on Wall Street and a white dude in a suit said "have a nice day" she wouldn't feel so violated. Plus, she's walking through lower socioeconomic neighborhoods. Broke men tend to be extra thirsty. She knows this, which is why she chose those neighborhoods to walk through. A "round the way" chick like her would be invisible on Wall Street or Park Ave.
Second: This video is about men going out of their way to objectify this woman based on her physique. Yet this chick wears tight jeans showing off said physique. I can see if the chick was wearing a flowing skirt or something less tight. But the chick, any most chicks, wear the sh#t that they know is going to catch attention but then get upset when dudes are giving them the attention that comes with wearing tight jeans.
Third: This does more to show how thirsty dudes are then anything about this chick being in danger. This chick was not being followed or touched or assaulted. This woman was receiving cat calls, some "damn" and mostly "have nice day." Yea, are dudes doing it as a hopeful segue? Yes, but is that a crime? Is that something that even warrants attention? No.
If I could make it so, I would have dudes take a week long sabbatical on approaching women. No conversation, no holding of doors, no favors because she's a woman and/or pretty, no dates, no money being spent.....nothing for a whole week.
Let these chicks feel the weight of being ignored and without male attention for awhile. The same chicks talking that "harassment" sh#t would be begging for some dude to simply acknowledge her presence. A big component of this phenomenon is the pumpkinheadness that comes with 2014 feminism....the idea that men are so enthralled by women that the female gender is in constant danger of assault due to the uncontrollable male libido.
I blame these cupcake a## n#ggas who always giving these pumpkinhead b#tches breaks. Resthaven n#ggas giving women undue attention and confidence. Dudes giving these women air to breathe, so they can formulate these nut ideas.
But people will watch this video without peeping the context of it. Like I said, this woman intentionally chose the neighborhoods she walked through as a bias for the video. She knows that her "round the way" vibe would be NOTHING in more prosperour areas. She also knows that black and hispanic men are easy targets for this propoganda.
And let's be real....this chick is average. Which only proves my point about her choosing which neighborhoods to walk through.
Peace
I'm an above average looking dude, I'm tall and I cycle, I' go to college , but does that added worth in the dating market give me the right to scream abuse when a fattie thinks she can sweep me of my feetI wouldnt go as far as to say women look at unsuitable men as "subhuman filth", but again, why should women be obligated to deal with men they deem mediocre?
I said it to someone else, I think. Touching, following, etc.
"Who knows what a conversation can lead to?" In NYC, you learn fast that 9,999,999,999 times out of 10,000,000,000 that if someone on the street is approaching you for a "conversation", they want something. Money, sex, or just to waste your time. Why are women obligated to stop and talk to every man who says something to them?
If people don't want to be talked to, people don't want to be talked to. This shyt is in the same vein as solicitation (i.e. Amnesty International people approaching for donations) and panhandling IMO... sure its generally harmless, but its a nuisance, and people shouldn't be demonized or shamed for not wanting to be subjected to it all the time out of some bullshyt common courtesy.
Dont worry young harassee, it gets better with time. You'll see, 10 years from now men will treat you like your invisible.
I met my wife approaching her on the street. You really want it to be a crime to approach women on the street. This shyt is insane.What % of women that uve been with, did u meet by approaching them on the street?
@Raul & @Wild self... Wild self especially is always complaining about womens' "attitudes". And a lot of brehs feel that way... i.e. if a chick isn't interested she's "being rude".So we are in agreement: there was very little harassment in this video.
Who said this?![]()
Dawg, what % of interactions like the ones in the video ever lead to anything? It's not like they are in some small town or a region where "exchanging pleasantries" is a cultural norm, it's fukking New York City.And yes, most of our interactions lead to nothing, but sometimes they lead to more (and these times are often not predictable pre-conversation), even if it's just a pleasant convo. Some folks enjoy that. Whether it's flirting or just an exchange of pleasantries, some folks genuinely enjoy having those interactions. It's not all about who you end up getting to fukk.
By seeing that she is a woman in NYC powerwalking and making zero eye contact with them as she approaches and walks by?And how are people who want to talk supposed to know this without talking to her???
Like I said I'm not advocating for the law to be made, for other reasons. I am just asking why dudes persist with this method given a 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% failure rate.In 90% of the instances in the vid, her lack of a response was taken as an indication that she didn't want to talk and their interaction ended there. Outside of her annoyance the she has to go through that process with multiple different guys, there's no harm done here by any of those individual guys. There's certainly no need for any new laws to address this issue.
Interesting that she didn't walk by any white construction workers during those 10 hours.
You can't sell street harassment without black faces. It's impossible.How about we also talk about the race baiting in this video and how they sift through 10 hours of footage and only show Latino men and Black men. Apparently they had 'audio problem's when it came to putting white men on camera.
The GAWDESS has spoken
I voice of reason in a sea of feminist idiots