Hook winning his dad's belt was cool, and Starks turning face was awesome; but the real story of the night is Moxley breaking his old record for how early he bled during a meaningless match.I haven't watch the show yet but I'm hearing that the HOOKers got a reason to celebrate tonight
You would've hated the Sammartino and Hogan championship runs, then. And don't get me started on all of those Flair v. Dusty, or Sting v. Luger matches.It will never be as "unpredictable" as a year long tag team title reign, two year long world title reign, Brock and Roman having another match on the biggest shows, or Bianca and Becky feuding again, but it's a start.
You would've hated the Sammartino and Hogan championship runs, then. And don't get me started on all of those Flair v. Dusty, or Sting v. Luger matches.
Only if it's a combat sport where the "performers" don't spend most of the show and the media scrum telling us that the shyt is fake.Blood in a combat sport is a very p*ssy thing to complain about
The Bengals lost to the Jets, but beat the Chiefs. What point are you trying to make?Daniel Garcia lost to Wheeler Yuta, but he beat Bryan Danielson? The math ain't mathin'!
You're comparing team sports to a singles competition. Rethink that.The Bengals lost to the Jets, but beat the Chiefs. What point are you trying to make?
Rafael Nadal lost to Lucas Rosol but beat Roger Federer. Is that better? Is the superior talent supposed to win every time? Upsets don't happen?You're comparing team sports to a singles competition. Rethink that.
You picked a singles competion this time, now make it a scripted competition where logic precedes skill.Rafael Nadal lost to Lucas Rosol but beat Roger Federer. Is that better? Is the superior talent supposed to win every time? Upsets don't happen?
You picked a singles competion this time, now make it a scripted competition where logic precedes skill.
Also, Nadal is an elite tennis player, he's several skill notches above Daniel Garcia. That's still not the gotcha question you were looking for.
That's the question you should've asked at the beginning. Yes, upsets are absolutely a part of wrestling, and they absolutely should be.So my question is, should there be no upsets in wrestling? The superior opponent should win every match?
That's the question you should've asked at the beginning. Yes, upsets are absolutely a part of wrestling, and they absolutely should be.
Garcia's win could've been his "1-2-3 Kid moment", but TK booked Garcia to look like a scrub, and Danielson to look like a goof instead. Jake Hager wasn't necessary, and he had the flabbiest interference ever.
Had Garcia gotten the fluke win against Danielson without interference, then he would've gotten his big moment. He would have gained credibilty. Instead, this match will mean as little as Hager beating Wardlow.