You know it's inevitable... The Batman V Superman SPOILER Discussion Thread

The axe murderer

For I am death and I ride on a pale horse
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
40,315
Reputation
6,138
Daps
137,988
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is a battle cry for “Not All Men"
Updated by Alex Abad-Santos on March 26, 2016, 11:30 a.m. ET @alex_abadsalex@vox.com
TWEET SHARE (110) Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is a crime against comic book fans
But amidst Batman v Superman's heap of broken themes and stories, there is one thing that Snyder, perhaps unintentionally, makes abundantly clear: Batman is the most prominent "Not All Men" supporter on the face of this planet.
In more than one instance, Batman uses a permutation of the "not all men" rebuttal to correct Wonder Woman's notions about Earth — never mind that she is a longtime observer of its cyclical nature of man-made wars and strifes. There's also a grand sacrifice at the center of the film that's as much about saving the world as it is about Batman proving that he's "a good man."
Batman vSupermanisn't the only superhero story that explores the idea that our world is full of people who are exceptions, both good and bad, to the norm. These stories offer writers a chance to explore complex subjects — authoritarianism, political beliefs, vigilantism, etc. — without the constraints of reality.
But what Batman vSuperman does is peculiar in how much weight it places on Batman's worldview, suggesting that his view is the only one that matters, and that Batman knows best. The movie presents him as a wrongly scolded victim. And when you start to crack his mentality, it helps you understand the film's psyche a bit more.
Batman: Not all Men are selfish

bcf2b69f7481eefd7d27a77c66d219fae1589a97.jpg

Batman v Superman (Warner Bros.)

When people use the phrase "Not All Men," it's a punchline that mocks someone, most likely a man, who tries to deflect valid conversations about topics related to diversity and tolerance (e.g. sexism in the workplace, racism, homophobia, etc.) by exempting themselves of any criticism. My former colleague Kelsey McKinney wrote an entertaining explainer on how the phrase came to be, but the basic traits that characterize Not All Men supporters are short-sighted, condescending men who tend to live anonymously on the internet.
The first time the concept of Not All Men arises in Batman v Superman is about midway through the film. Diana Prince a.k.a. Wonder Woman (played by Gal Gadot) steals a hard drive from Bruce Wayne a.k.a. Batman (Ben Affleck) that contains data Bruce hacked from Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg). Bruce tracks her down at a museum and asks her about the stolen drive.
"You know it’s true what they say about little boys." she tells Bruce, "Born with no natural inclination to share. I didn’t steal it — I borrowed it."
Diana can't access what's on the drive, though, because Luthor encrypted it. She gives it back to Bruce, who can break the encryption. And when he's done, he sends her some information via email with a subject line in the vein of, "Boys Share Too." Bruce emails like someone who isn't particularly tech-savvy (with weirdspacing, sporadic caps, and fragmented sentences), includes a creepy photo of her, and asks her about her possible immortality. And he presumably Googled or hacked Luthor's drive her to find her email address, then contacted her through e-mail the way an earnest "Not All Men" believer would.
I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that little boys are born with no natural inclination to share. When Diana suggests to Bruce that it's something people say, it's the first I've ever heard of the idea. It even goes against real-life studies, like one conducted in 2011 by researchers at the University of Washington that found babies as young as 15 months have the ability to identify when their peers have unequal amounts of food or toys, and to exhibit traits of fairness or altruism.
Even if the interaction between Bruce and Diana isn't based in any kind of reality — and since Batman v Superman is a fictional story, it has no obligation to be — it sets the tone for this world. Men don't share. Men are selfish. Wonder Woman is better because she shares.
But Batman is the exception — and he isn't afraid to remind her of that.
Batman: Not All Men are bad. Men are still good.
On the official soundtrack for Batman v Superman, there's an icy, heaving instrumental called "Men Are Still Good":


8401b7cdd8bdc650cebe51b3e717618919eae7a6


Men Are Still Good - The Batman Suite
Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL
</>
14:04




The song corresponds to a pivotal moment late in the film, when Wonder Woman is ready to return to her home on the island of Themyscira. Her work is done, and she seems ready to step back into the hedges and vanish from the public eye for awhile. This is in line with Wonder Woman's original comic book mythology (her origin story has been tweaked multiple times since) — she's and other Amazons live in isolation on the island because they've seen how nasty mankind can be.
In keeping with this, she tells Batman that she's seen the ugliness of Earth's wars and that she disappeared a century ago (duringWorld War I) because she was tired of seeing men muck it all up. But he doesn't let her go that easily. He tells her that she needs to find other metahumans like herself and assemble a team. Why?
"Men are still good," he tells her.
Never mind that she's been around for a century, is exponentially stronger than him, and has saved the world before. He clearly doesn't care that she's seen a lot more of this world than he has — and how he fits into her observation. He simply tut-tuts her hesitance until she decides to stick around.
Of course, since there is a Justice League movie in the works, Batman is totally right; there will still be "good men" who will fight to protect the planet from evil. But he's ignoring Wonder Woman's larger point — that man has consistently found a way to disappoint her over the century or so that she's been kicking it on Earth. And perhaps, in Snyder's eyes, Wonder Woman is the real sexist.
Superman died for Not All Men
Despite repeatedly insisting to Wonder Woman that there are still good men out there — including himself, of course — Batman somehow fails to see how Superman can be good, too. There is no benefit of the doubt to be given. Because Superman fought a battle with General Zod that ended up damaging and affecting the lives of some of Bruce's employees, Batman sees Superman as a threat that must be eliminated.
It's notable that, for as gung-ho as he is with punishing Superman for the damage he caused, Batman is seen murdering and torturing people throughout Batman v Superman. Killing Superman is something he feels must be done to save the good people of this world, even though the movie contains a specific montage in which Superman saves people in all kinds of ways.
It's confusing for Batman v Superman to depict Superman as a villain. He saves plenty of people, and we can probably assume that at some point, Batman would ostensibly agree that Superman is doing some kind of net good. However, only Snyder knows for sure whether that's true.
In the end, what (temporarily)saves Superman from doom and redeems him in Batman's eyes — and I am not kidding — is that Superman's mother and Batman's mother have the same name. There is literally a scene where Batman is ready to murder Superman and Superman says the word Martha, which cleanses Batman of his bloodlust.
Not all men have mothers named Martha.
At the end of the movie, Superman dies a dumb, avoidable death (explained here), and it basically canonizes him as the patron man saint of Not All Men. It's his final act to show Batman and anyone else who dislikes him (Batman v Superman is never clear about how the public feels about Superman) that he's good. It's a moment where he proves Lex Luthor wrong and shows that all-powerful men can be entirely good. And as he dies while plunging a Kryptonite spear into Doomsday, he might as well be screaming, "NOT ALL MEN" in a "THIS IS SPARTA" fashion.
Superman's death changes how many people, including Batman, see him. And it prompts Batman/Bruce to create the Justice League. Did Superman really have to die for us to realize how good he is? I mean, besides it being ammunition for Batman to tell Diana "not all men"?
By the end Batman v Superman, Batman is a reformed man because he realizes he was wrongabout Superman.
But he still hasn't changed his "not all men" stance, and in Snyder's eyes,he doesn't have to. After all, he's convinced Diana that the metahumans are good people and they can protect this world from evil.
Batman, in Snyder's iteration, isn't so much fighting to keep good people safe as he is asserting his worldview. He cares more about punishing Superman than saving lives. If he did care about people as much as he said he did, then he wouldn't be running his Batmobile all over, destroying buildings and we'd see some reflection or some deliberation about the deaths he caused.
Instead, he's fighting because he has able to assemble a team of men (and one woman) who, just like him, are an exception to the rule — people who are good in this sea of bad. And he isn't looking to change the world that Wonder Woman dislikes — the same one that Superman cherishes — as much as he is out to affirm what he believes.
Click to expand...​
LMFAO @ this feminst shyt. :laff::laff::laff::laff::laff:
 

prophecypro

Hollywood North
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
28,158
Reputation
2,673
Daps
60,494
Reppin
LDN
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is a battle cry for “Not All Men"
Updated by Alex Abad-Santos on March 26, 2016, 11:30 a.m. ET @alex_abadsalex@vox.com
TWEET SHARE (110) Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is a crime against comic book fans
But amidst Batman v Superman's heap of broken themes and stories, there is one thing that Snyder, perhaps unintentionally, makes abundantly clear: Batman is the most prominent "Not All Men" supporter on the face of this planet.
In more than one instance, Batman uses a permutation of the "not all men" rebuttal to correct Wonder Woman's notions about Earth — never mind that she is a longtime observer of its cyclical nature of man-made wars and strifes. There's also a grand sacrifice at the center of the film that's as much about saving the world as it is about Batman proving that he's "a good man."
Batman vSupermanisn't the only superhero story that explores the idea that our world is full of people who are exceptions, both good and bad, to the norm. These stories offer writers a chance to explore complex subjects — authoritarianism, political beliefs, vigilantism, etc. — without the constraints of reality.
But what Batman vSuperman does is peculiar in how much weight it places on Batman's worldview, suggesting that his view is the only one that matters, and that Batman knows best. The movie presents him as a wrongly scolded victim. And when you start to crack his mentality, it helps you understand the film's psyche a bit more.
Batman: Not all Men are selfish

bcf2b69f7481eefd7d27a77c66d219fae1589a97.jpg

Batman v Superman (Warner Bros.)

When people use the phrase "Not All Men," it's a punchline that mocks someone, most likely a man, who tries to deflect valid conversations about topics related to diversity and tolerance (e.g. sexism in the workplace, racism, homophobia, etc.) by exempting themselves of any criticism. My former colleague Kelsey McKinney wrote an entertaining explainer on how the phrase came to be, but the basic traits that characterize Not All Men supporters are short-sighted, condescending men who tend to live anonymously on the internet.
The first time the concept of Not All Men arises in Batman v Superman is about midway through the film. Diana Prince a.k.a. Wonder Woman (played by Gal Gadot) steals a hard drive from Bruce Wayne a.k.a. Batman (Ben Affleck) that contains data Bruce hacked from Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg). Bruce tracks her down at a museum and asks her about the stolen drive.
"You know it’s true what they say about little boys." she tells Bruce, "Born with no natural inclination to share. I didn’t steal it — I borrowed it."
Diana can't access what's on the drive, though, because Luthor encrypted it. She gives it back to Bruce, who can break the encryption. And when he's done, he sends her some information via email with a subject line in the vein of, "Boys Share Too." Bruce emails like someone who isn't particularly tech-savvy (with weirdspacing, sporadic caps, and fragmented sentences), includes a creepy photo of her, and asks her about her possible immortality. And he presumably Googled or hacked Luthor's drive her to find her email address, then contacted her through e-mail the way an earnest "Not All Men" believer would.
I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that little boys are born with no natural inclination to share. When Diana suggests to Bruce that it's something people say, it's the first I've ever heard of the idea. It even goes against real-life studies, like one conducted in 2011 by researchers at the University of Washington that found babies as young as 15 months have the ability to identify when their peers have unequal amounts of food or toys, and to exhibit traits of fairness or altruism.
Even if the interaction between Bruce and Diana isn't based in any kind of reality — and since Batman v Superman is a fictional story, it has no obligation to be — it sets the tone for this world. Men don't share. Men are selfish. Wonder Woman is better because she shares.
But Batman is the exception — and he isn't afraid to remind her of that.
Batman: Not All Men are bad. Men are still good.
On the official soundtrack for Batman v Superman, there's an icy, heaving instrumental called "Men Are Still Good":


8401b7cdd8bdc650cebe51b3e717618919eae7a6


Men Are Still Good - The Batman Suite
Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL
</>
14:04




The song corresponds to a pivotal moment late in the film, when Wonder Woman is ready to return to her home on the island of Themyscira. Her work is done, and she seems ready to step back into the hedges and vanish from the public eye for awhile. This is in line with Wonder Woman's original comic book mythology (her origin story has been tweaked multiple times since) — she's and other Amazons live in isolation on the island because they've seen how nasty mankind can be.
In keeping with this, she tells Batman that she's seen the ugliness of Earth's wars and that she disappeared a century ago (duringWorld War I) because she was tired of seeing men muck it all up. But he doesn't let her go that easily. He tells her that she needs to find other metahumans like herself and assemble a team. Why?
"Men are still good," he tells her.
Never mind that she's been around for a century, is exponentially stronger than him, and has saved the world before. He clearly doesn't care that she's seen a lot more of this world than he has — and how he fits into her observation. He simply tut-tuts her hesitance until she decides to stick around.
Of course, since there is a Justice League movie in the works, Batman is totally right; there will still be "good men" who will fight to protect the planet from evil. But he's ignoring Wonder Woman's larger point — that man has consistently found a way to disappoint her over the century or so that she's been kicking it on Earth. And perhaps, in Snyder's eyes, Wonder Woman is the real sexist.
Superman died for Not All Men
Despite repeatedly insisting to Wonder Woman that there are still good men out there — including himself, of course — Batman somehow fails to see how Superman can be good, too. There is no benefit of the doubt to be given. Because Superman fought a battle with General Zod that ended up damaging and affecting the lives of some of Bruce's employees, Batman sees Superman as a threat that must be eliminated.
It's notable that, for as gung-ho as he is with punishing Superman for the damage he caused, Batman is seen murdering and torturing people throughout Batman v Superman. Killing Superman is something he feels must be done to save the good people of this world, even though the movie contains a specific montage in which Superman saves people in all kinds of ways.
It's confusing for Batman v Superman to depict Superman as a villain. He saves plenty of people, and we can probably assume that at some point, Batman would ostensibly agree that Superman is doing some kind of net good. However, only Snyder knows for sure whether that's true.
In the end, what (temporarily)saves Superman from doom and redeems him in Batman's eyes — and I am not kidding — is that Superman's mother and Batman's mother have the same name. There is literally a scene where Batman is ready to murder Superman and Superman says the word Martha, which cleanses Batman of his bloodlust.
Not all men have mothers named Martha.
At the end of the movie, Superman dies a dumb, avoidable death (explained here), and it basically canonizes him as the patron man saint of Not All Men. It's his final act to show Batman and anyone else who dislikes him (Batman v Superman is never clear about how the public feels about Superman) that he's good. It's a moment where he proves Lex Luthor wrong and shows that all-powerful men can be entirely good. And as he dies while plunging a Kryptonite spear into Doomsday, he might as well be screaming, "NOT ALL MEN" in a "THIS IS SPARTA" fashion.
Superman's death changes how many people, including Batman, see him. And it prompts Batman/Bruce to create the Justice League. Did Superman really have to die for us to realize how good he is? I mean, besides it being ammunition for Batman to tell Diana "not all men"?
By the end Batman v Superman, Batman is a reformed man because he realizes he was wrongabout Superman.
But he still hasn't changed his "not all men" stance, and in Snyder's eyes,he doesn't have to. After all, he's convinced Diana that the metahumans are good people and they can protect this world from evil.
Batman, in Snyder's iteration, isn't so much fighting to keep good people safe as he is asserting his worldview. He cares more about punishing Superman than saving lives. If he did care about people as much as he said he did, then he wouldn't be running his Batmobile all over, destroying buildings and we'd see some reflection or some deliberation about the deaths he caused.
Instead, he's fighting because he has able to assemble a team of men (and one woman) who, just like him, are an exception to the rule — people who are good in this sea of bad. And he isn't looking to change the world that Wonder Woman dislikes — the same one that Superman cherishes — as much as he is out to affirm what he believes.
Click to expand...​
LMFAO @ this feminst shyt. :laff::laff::laff::laff::laff:



This argument really got into reviewing the movie? I knew the think pieces would come out :ld:
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
I think you REALLY wasn't paying attention at all.

1. Yes, Superman killed that one African terrorist leader. It was a HUGE deal that set-up the entire plot. Not only was it acknowledge, the ENTIRE SENATE hearing was about that.

2. The movie has one of the simplest plots, but a lot of depth. The plot is simple: Does Earth need someone who is a God in man's image. Lex Luthor views Superman as the ultimate threat to mankind's existence and want Superman out of existence by way of using Batman. That is it. Everything else is subplots that links Luthor being behind everything just to set up the demise of Superman.

3. Wonder Woman's purpose was a subplot to introduce the Justice League. Lex was searching for other metahumans and discovered files on her. She learned about this and wants to get them back because she didn't want to be exposed.

4. Lex Luthor had one motivation. To kill Superman, not just physically, but also what he represented symbolically to people. That's the reason behind the staged African massacre, the suicide bombing at the Senate, and getting the military and government approved exclusive access to Supergirl's ship and Zod's body. As well as manipulating both Batman and Superman to have an automatic dislike, especially with Batman who was determined to end Superman for those same reasons that Luthor believed, but the only difference is Batman wants to kill Superman to save humanity, whereas Luthor wants it for his own selfish desire. Luthor is a narcissist with a superiority complex and even the idea of a God that can rule over man rubs him the wrong way. He takes self-gratification in a man being able to kill or control God. He explains his rationale plenty of times, not just to Superman, but as well as to Senator Finch.

5. The movie IS supposed to be about him, but it is mostly through the perspectives of everyone else. So, of course he wouldn't have many dialogue. This film is an theologian analogy to the Passion of Christ in which Jesus comes in and claims to be a savior of mankind, the people have mixed feelings about him, he's been judged, he is crucified, and in the end it is hinted to his resurrection. The parallels to this and Jesus are quite blatant. So, of course it doesn't have heavy dialogue from Superman himself, it doesn't it... it mostly from everyone else's POV.

6. Batman had every reason to see Superman as a threat. a.) he was there at ground zero and witnessed his own financial building destroyed and his employees killed or paralyzed. b.) he gets a vision and a warning about Superman and how a world under his totalitarian rule would look like (implying the whole INJUSTICE narrative). c.) he discovered the return checks by his former employee with Lex making it look like his former employee didn't have his back then seeing the Capitol building explode with Superman in it. He had motives. And, as suggested by Alfred, since the learning of Superman's existence and how it affected innocent lives that Bruce personally saw get killed, Batman's brutality increase to having zero-fukks. There's no evidence of him bring a killing machine prior to Superman. And even when the sex slave trader was caught... he didn't kill him, just branded him and that was the 1st time Clark heard of Batman's actions and ethics. And not only that, the dream/vision sequence was from an alternate timeline. Lastly, he never went out to try to kill people with the purpose to kill people with the exception of Superman because he firmly believe he needed to be dead. The car chase scene was mostly either incidental or by trafficker's own fault. The warehouse scene... he didn't really kill ANYONE intentionally. He didn't go in there guns blazing on some Punisher shyt. The people who were killed was when dude fell on his own grenade, those who self-inflicted their own deaths, and the head Russian holding Martha Kent which, BTW is literally straight from Frank Miller's TDKR graphic novel and even with that Batman didn't shot him point blank. He shot at the flame torch and that exploded into flames....without truly confirmation of if dude was dead or have extreme degree burns. He's brutal, he's doesn't give a fucck anymore but it's not out seeking to kill with that being the 1st thought.

7. You saying Superman Returns... a movie with zero action. The worst story plot ever in comic book history. And a force-fed love note to Richard Donner. You lose points for that alone.

8. The warehouse scene wasn't shown just a little bit in the trailer, not the full entire thing.

9. Lets start with the fact that Superman was holding back in the fight against Batman. But Superman used his hearing A LOT... he used his speed to get from point A to point B a lot. He definitely used his laser vision which is his deadliest weapon a lot. So what are you talking about? Who CARES if he didn't use his cooling breathe? What purpose would it serve? Lastly, it is very much implied that he used his X-ray vision a number of times. Afterall, it is how he knew who Batman was.

10. Superman used his speed to get anywhere at a blink of an eye. He is capable of all the things you said, except he CANNOT see or hear through LEAD not that means anything. What he also cannot do is read minds. How the hell could he know where his mom IS? Saying to use so-called super hearing. It DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT. It's not like he can hear everything everywhere. Even that has limits. That's like Quinn telling Han "We could use the FORCE"... dummy... it doesn't work like that.

11. Again, if he was to find where his mother was within time... she would of been killed. PERIOD. It was that simple. Plus, you dismiss the fact that Lex had a contingency plan and was creating doomsday already and he was using Superman to buy that extra time if Batman wasn't able to do the job.

12. Again, Superman didn't want to fight Batman to begin with. 2nd of all, Batman was in his protective suit that prevents him getting knocked out, and lastly he had extra rounds of Kryptonite gas grenades to ensure Superman can be out of commission. Other words, Batman had PREP-TIME.

13. The Knightmare scene is arguably one of the most important foreshadowing scenes implying INJUSTICE being part of the upcoming Justice League movie.

14. So, the African massacre, the Senate bombing, the Flash visions, the metahuman files, oh and the DEATH OF SUPERMAN is all from the trailers. Okay.

15. Again, not even paying attention Bruce stated the Superman coffin is empty. And the conversation is straight corn? How? Because Bruce told Diana that they need to recruit for form a Justice League due to his own foreshadowed predictions to what's to come?

16. And there it is.... Marvel stan boyisms. But you WB still got your money! :umad:

1. They never acknowledged him killing the leader, Superman even says "I didn't kill those men" to lois in the bathtub, Lois tried to find evidence to clear Clark the whole movie, which was THE BULLET, so the only acknowledged the guys shot has dying lol. You are a stan and type all that shyt for nothing, pitiful.

2. That is not a plot, this is your take on it with nothing tangible to support it. No wonder you like this bullshyt, you have no clue.

3. That's exacly What Wonder Served in REALITY, I'm talking in terms of the movie, They never explained what or why she was doing in metropolis lmao.

4. You don't understand what motivation is. You are just telling what happened in the scenes lol, he had nothing to gain from superman dying or no reason to want to kill him.

5. LMAO, the movie is about him and he's barely in it lmao. Neo was more comparable to Jesus than superman. Besides Luthor calling him GOD, there's nothing pure or holy about superman. People didn't have mixed feelings until Luthor planted them lol, he had a monument built after him, jesus was doubted by the most worshipped by few. Try again.

6.. Batman witness with his own eyes Superman save the planet from the kryptonians trying to terraform the planet, he didn't harm anyone himself, any reasonable person can see that, Batman is not suppose to be a moron. Everything else you typed would take throwing logic out the window to seem reasonable.
Opening scene was terrible, Bruce calling the guy to tell him to evacuate the building while he the same guy is watching the chaos from his office lmao, did he really n
ed Bruce to call him to tell him that, it's dumb.

7. The airplane scene in Superman Returns and Kevin Spacey's coat are better than anything in this movie lmao. Action isn't everything, the plot was bad, but AT LEAST THERE WAS A PLOT.

8. The warehouse was shown in the trailer except for clark's mom and the fact batman killed a bunch of people.

9. Superman was holding back in the fight when he could END THE FIGHT IN SECONDS BY RESTRAINING, NOT KILLING, BATMAN WIT HIS SUPER STRENGTH AND SPEED. STANNERY IS ON 100 right now.

10. Superman can hear people all over the world, he can tune in to the city and here, and the warehouse WASN'T MADE OF LEAD lmao, also superman's speed should be fast enough where he could coverf every square mile of the city in seconds. This is the problem when you claim a character has limitless strength and speed, but give him limits lmao.

11. SUPERMAN HAS SUPER SPEED. THE FACT HE ONLY USES IT WHEN THE PLOT REQUIRES IS WHY THE CHARACTER IS TRASH. Either he has super speed or he doesn't. In Superman Returns he listened to people all over the world. He heard loises screaming and he's nowhere around, and caught her lol. He would've heard his mother screaming lol. IT'S A PLOT HOLE.

12. Superman was getting his ass kicked, at some point he had to defend himself. The point is, superman is so strong he doesn't need to kill batman, his great strength will allow him to easily RESTRAIN HIM WITHOUT KILLING HIM. He could put batman down in an instant if he wanted to without killing him lol.

13. It looked like shyt, the fight scene was cheap looking unlike the warehouse scene.

14. And they all compile to maybe a minute of screen time.

15. Clark Kent had a big gaping hole in him, they had Zod's body but wouldn't recover superman's lol. An autopsy would reveal Clark Kent is superman because without kryptonite present his cells would regenerate lol. The movie contradicts itself time and time again.

16. I'm not a marvel stan, the movie is just bad, just like Avengers and Avengers 2. You are the stan, because you have to use your imagination to explain things that aren't even implied in the film lol.
 

TheGodling

Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
20,078
Reputation
5,624
Daps
70,597
Reppin
Rotterdam
he didn't kill anyone though....he fired the gun to empty the chip....

speaking on the killing shyt in general: I really paid close attention to his scenes to see if he was killing, and he wasnt...even when he was busting his gun in the knightmare scene, he wasn't killing dudes....he was just shooting them, hurting them...they were still moving around and shyt after he shot them....what this 'he's killing people' shyt says to me is that a lot of people didn't really pay attention to the movie...

Dude, he literally fires a machine gun at the gas tank of flamethrower guy. It explodes. That guy is fukking dead.:russ:
 

HipHopStan

Top 113 Poster
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Messages
17,200
Reputation
4,684
Daps
64,230
Reppin
I LIVE IN A CARDBOARD BOX!
The thing that KILLS me is this complaint about Batman not killing Superman. 1st of all, we KNOW for a fact that they're going to team up. I ask this question. HOW ELSE could it be done? There has to be a scene or an incident or something to get Batman to change his view about Superman and if this was an absolute battle to the death and Batman is literally on the VERGE of killing... tell me WHAT OTHER WAY could it been prevented? Someone PLEASE suggest a bigger reason for Batman to eventually side with Superman.

I say that to tell say. I have ZERO ISSUES with it. It didn't even occurred to me that both Superman and Batman's mothers had the same name even in the comics. If this would of been something that was just made up in the film, I could slightly understand it as a cop out. But in regards to both of those character really are named that in the comic book, I feel is a genius way to make that connect. Not because of the NAME itself, but what their mothers meant to both Batman and Superman.

From Superman's perspective, the only thing on his mind was saving his mother. He was on the verge of getting killed. He DOES NOT CARE if he gets killed, he's not even pleading for his life, he is BEGGING this stranger to save his mother....that is all he has left! He never knew his biological mom. His is the only mother he knows and that is the only thing that is on his mind... not that he's about to be killed, but that his mother will be killed unless someone saves her.

On Batman's perspective.... the ENTIRE REASON that he is Batman is because of the murder of his parents right in front of him. He is FUCCKED UP mentally. That is common knowledge that's been reinforced countless and countless of times. Batman is mentally, emotionally, psychologically tormented because of the death of his parents. He is forever TRAPPED to that torment. And you didn't even have to know this from reading the comics, he was BLATANTLY made immediately by opening the movie up with that infamous scene and repeated by the nightmares he keeps getting. In this movie he's more psychologically damaged than in any other film version of him. So having someone who he only just saw as an ALIEN and nothing more say his mother's name... why shouldn't that just fukk HIM UP IN THE HEAD. This alien just called out his mother's name and did no know him for squat. Every person have an emotional trigger point. And a lot of people with regular PTSD would spazz out if you say something that connects to things that initiated that PSTD to begin with. Batman is BEYOND having PSTD, dude is a nutcase that dressing up in a batsuit and sparks his own brand of terror upon criminals. He has nightmares. He keeps reliving that incident.... saying his mother's name is an emotional TRIGGER.

Then when Lois shows up and states that it is Superman's mother, not only did he stop viewing Superman as merely some dangerous alien, it was the 1st time he actually sees him as a person pleading for his mother to be saved. A situation in which he COULD NOT SAVE HIS OWN MOTHER, there for a chance for personal redemption. This is why he volunteered to go save Martha with a vow that she would not be killed.

I thought that was the most BRILLIANT scene, because showed BOTH the humanity and compassion of our heroes as well as their own psychology. It was a vital connect. And even with that, Batman wasn't just suddenly chumming.... he just made a promise to save Superman's mom and it was more for HIMSELF as a redemption for not being able to save his own mother. After that, there was bigger problems with Doomsday.

So, again...unless anyone tell me something BETTER...stop with this notion that all it took was but we got the same mother's name and boom the beef was squash..there was DEEPER and CLEAR reasons behind that shyt.

:ehh: The Martha scene was one big problem I had with the movie, but after reading this, I see a new prospective on this. Props, dap, and rep. I'm kind of glad that Martha got brought up in this movie, because it seems like in all media, Bruce always looks to his father, and hardly says anything about his mom.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
32,692
Reputation
2,910
Daps
71,385
Reppin
Yeah
Now that I saw it again so much reminded me of the dark knight

Blowing up the courthouse and the senator seeing the label before she died (like the judge in TDK opening the envelope)

Pushing Lois off getting supes to chase her like joker did with Rachel

Lex trying to show superman isn't a good guy, same thing joker did with two face

Trying to get people to turn on each other
Yeah lex had his plan down to a T. I mean even his timing was on point.

(Superman came to confront him exactly as the timer ended)

Idk why but I liked that "mother of god look at the time" line a lot when I started paying more attention to the dialogue.

Lex reminded me of white people that you work with who talk in a fake voice love small talk and act fake friendly.
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-50
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
Fans are coming away praising batman yet completely ignoring that this version is a dumb brute. His hatred towards superman is completely misguided and overblown and you would think such a smart and rational character (in the comics and cartoons at least) would investigate first before arriving at such a conclusion. but no, this guy who seems to be doing only good things (and saving the world from the alien that killed his friend)... must be destroyed immediately and he's going to make it his life's ambition.

If this batman were POTUS he'd nuke every country on earth because there's a 1% chance they could be our enemy.


unless of course it's revealed their mother has the same name...
 
Last edited:

detroitwalt

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
10,189
Reputation
1,413
Daps
25,385
The thing that KILLS me is this complaint about Batman not killing Superman. 1st of all, we KNOW for a fact that they're going to team up. I ask this question. HOW ELSE could it be done? There has to be a scene or an incident or something to get Batman to change his view about Superman and if this was an absolute battle to the death and Batman is literally on the VERGE of killing... tell me WHAT OTHER WAY could it been prevented? Someone PLEASE suggest a bigger reason for Batman to eventually side with Superman.
Since we know they're going to team up how about not putting Batman in a position to kill Superman? It's weak writing that they couldn't come up with something better than their mothers having the same name. I don't see how anybody can defend that.
 

TheGodling

Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
20,078
Reputation
5,624
Daps
70,597
Reppin
Rotterdam
The thing that KILLS me is this complaint about Batman not killing Superman. 1st of all, we KNOW for a fact that they're going to team up. I ask this question. HOW ELSE could it be done? There has to be a scene or an incident or something to get Batman to change his view about Superman and if this was an absolute battle to the death and Batman is literally on the VERGE of killing... tell me WHAT OTHER WAY could it been prevented? Someone PLEASE suggest a bigger reason for Batman to eventually side with Superman.

I say that to tell say. I have ZERO ISSUES with it. It didn't even occurred to me that both Superman and Batman's mothers had the same name even in the comics. If this would of been something that was just made up in the film, I could slightly understand it as a cop out. But in regards to both of those character really are named that in the comic book, I feel is a genius way to make that connect. Not because of the NAME itself, but what their mothers meant to both Batman and Superman.

From Superman's perspective, the only thing on his mind was saving his mother. He was on the verge of getting killed. He DOES NOT CARE if he gets killed, he's not even pleading for his life, he is BEGGING this stranger to save his mother....that is all he has left! He never knew his biological mom. His is the only mother he knows and that is the only thing that is on his mind... not that he's about to be killed, but that his mother will be killed unless someone saves her.

On Batman's perspective.... the ENTIRE REASON that he is Batman is because of the murder of his parents right in front of him. He is FUCCKED UP mentally. That is common knowledge that's been reinforced countless and countless of times. Batman is mentally, emotionally, psychologically tormented because of the death of his parents. He is forever TRAPPED to that torment. And you didn't even have to know this from reading the comics, he was BLATANTLY made immediately by opening the movie up with that infamous scene and repeated by the nightmares he keeps getting. In this movie he's more psychologically damaged than in any other film version of him. So having someone who he only just saw as an ALIEN and nothing more say his mother's name... why shouldn't that just fukk HIM UP IN THE HEAD. This alien just called out his mother's name and did no know him for squat. Every person have an emotional trigger point. And a lot of people with regular PTSD would spazz out if you say something that connects to things that initiated that PSTD to begin with. Batman is BEYOND having PSTD, dude is a nutcase that dressing up in a batsuit and sparks his own brand of terror upon criminals. He has nightmares. He keeps reliving that incident.... saying his mother's name is an emotional TRIGGER.

Then when Lois shows up and states that it is Superman's mother, not only did he stop viewing Superman as merely some dangerous alien, it was the 1st time he actually sees him as a person pleading for his mother to be saved. A situation in which he COULD NOT SAVE HIS OWN MOTHER, there for a chance for personal redemption. This is why he volunteered to go save Martha with a vow that she would not be killed.

I thought that was the most BRILLIANT scene, because showed BOTH the humanity and compassion of our heroes as well as their own psychology. It was a vital connect. And even with that, Batman wasn't just suddenly chumming.... he just made a promise to save Superman's mom and it was more for HIMSELF as a redemption for not being able to save his own mother. After that, there was bigger problems with Doomsday.

So, again...unless anyone tell me something BETTER...stop with this notion that all it took was but we got the same mother's name and boom the beef was squash..there was DEEPER and CLEAR reasons behind that shyt.

TL;DR version. Supes uttering "Martha" caught Batman off guard because he thought he was talking about his mother, which is why he didn't kill him because he needed to know what Supes was talking about. Then when Lois clarifies that Martha is Supes' mother's name, Batman realizes something he never thought of before, that Supes wasn't a detached alien but instead incredibly human.

Tying that into Bats trying to find some redemption for being unable to save his own mom builds further on that psychology, but the essence of that moment is Batman realizing that despite all his powers Supes is really just as human as he is.
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-50
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
TL;DR version. Supes uttering "Martha" caught Batman off guard because he thought he was talking about his mother, which is why he didn't kill him because he needed to know what Supes was talking about. Then when Lois clarifies that Martha is Supes' mother's name, Batman realizes something he never thought of before, that Supes wasn't a detached alien but instead incredibly human.

Tying that into Bats trying to find some redemption for being unable to save his own mom builds further on that psychology, but the essence of that moment is Batman realizing that despite all his powers Supes is really just as human as he is.

so that guy who was running the traffic ring, all he had to do was say "hey i have a mom too"?

batman: :ohhh:"he's human, let him go"
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,943
Daps
120,887
Reppin
Behind You
so that guy who was running the traffic ring, all he had to do was say "hey i have a mom too"?

batman: :ohhh:"he's human, let him go"
Yeah because that was the point of the whole thing.:comeon:

It was a combo of having his preconceived notion of superman as some unfeeling aloof alien who is above humanity being shattered by the reality that Superman is a lot more human than that complete with a mother he loves (and is desperate to save) and a woman who loves him.
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-50
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
Yeah because that was the point of the whole thing.:comeon:

It was a combo of having his preconceived notion of superman as some unfeeling aloof alien who is above humanity being shattered by the reality that Superman is a lot more human than that complete with a mother he loves (and is desperate to save) and a woman who loves him.

okay, but what changed? there's still a 1% chance that he could destroy everyone on earth right? isn't that the reason batman wanted him gone?

batman just let's it go all of a sudden because he happens to have a mother that cares for him?
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,943
Daps
120,887
Reppin
Behind You
okay, but what changed? there's still a 1% chance that he could destroy everyone on earth right? isn't that the reason batman wanted him gone?

batman just let's it go all of a sudden because he happens to have a mother that cares for him?
He realized that Superman wasn't the monster he built him up to be in his head. At a moment when Superman was basically defenseless and about to be killed all Supes cared about was for Batman to make sure he went and saved Ma Kent right after shoving that spear in Superman's chest.
It really isn't that hard of a concept tpo grasp unless you are being obtuse on purpose.
 
Top