bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
Circumstantial evidence is a perfectly valid form of evidence. DNA is circumstantial evidence. There have been many convictions on only circumstantial evidence.
yeah, that wasn't my point because that is not what dude asked. he asked if there is video that proves guilt and i answered accordingly.
for example, one video i recall from the night of the shooting is one that shows the guys leaving the studio and getting into the car. but him getting into the car proves nothing about whether mell shot them. especially since he already admits he was there
Last edited: