Y'all heard about ChatGPT yet? AI instantly generates question answers, entire essays etc.

[Alvin]

been playing with this all day at work, can def see the positives with coding. Like someone said it's only as smart as the person typing a specific question, has more use on technical subjects than other things but these are some of the questions I asked it.

Why do some latinos consider themselves not "black" does this mean they don't see themselves as african or that the use of the word black differs from the U.S. definition (black = black person with ancestry from africa) compared to a latino being Brazilian, Cuban or Puerto Rican first and their skin color second if at all.



The issue of racial identity and classification is complex and can vary widely depending on cultural and historical factors. In many Latin American countries, the issue of race is often more fluid and nuanced than it is in the United States.
In the United States, racial categories are often defined in terms of ancestry, with "black" typically referring to individuals with African ancestry, and "white" referring to individuals with European ancestry. However, in many Latin American countries, racial identity is often based on a mix of ancestry, physical appearance, and cultural factors. As a result, individuals who may have African ancestry but who do not identify as "black" in the U.S. sense may still see themselves as having a distinct racial identity.
It's also important to note that the history of race and racial identity in Latin America is complex and often tied to issues of colonization, slavery, and the mixing of different cultural and ethnic groups. This history has resulted in a wide range of racial identities and classifications, and many individuals may identify with more than one racial or ethnic group.
Overall, the issue of racial identity is complex and can vary widely depending on cultural and historical factors. It's important to approach this issue with sensitivity and to recognize the diversity of experiences and perspectives within different cultural groups.

What was Reaganomics? And is it to blame to how the rich and right wing behave today?



Reaganomics, also known as supply-side economics or trickle-down economics, refers to the economic policies implemented by U.S. President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. These policies were characterized by a focus on tax cuts, deregulation, and reduced government spending, with the goal of stimulating economic growth and increasing private investment.
The basic idea behind Reaganomics was that reducing taxes and regulations would encourage businesses and individuals to invest and spend more, which would in turn create jobs and boost economic growth. The theory assumed that the benefits of this growth would "trickle down" to all levels of society, including the poor and working class.
While Reaganomics was popular among conservatives and is still seen as a defining policy of the Republican Party, its impact and legacy are a matter of ongoing debate. Proponents argue that the tax cuts and other policies implemented under Reagan helped to spur economic growth and create jobs, while opponents argue that the policies led to rising income inequality and a widening wealth gap between the rich and poor.
As for whether Reaganomics is to blame for how the rich and right wing behave today, that is a complex question with no simple answer. Some argue that the policies of the Reagan era helped to fuel the rise of neoliberalism and the dominance of free-market capitalism, which have contributed to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a small elite. Others argue that other factors, such as globalization, technological change, and political polarization, have played a more significant role in shaping the current economic and political landscape.
Ultimately, the legacy of Reaganomics is a matter of ongoing debate and interpretation, and it is difficult to attribute current economic and political trends solely to this set of policies.

What is Antifa? and is it a threat to domestic security compared to white nationalism?



Antifa is a loose collection of left-wing and anarchist activists who espouse anti-fascist views and engage in direct action, including protests, counter-demonstrations, and sometimes violent confrontations with far-right groups. Antifa stands for "anti-fascist" and the group is known for opposing white supremacy, racism, and authoritarianism.
Antifa has been the subject of controversy and debate, with some people characterizing it as a violent and dangerous organization and others arguing that it is a legitimate form of protest and resistance against fascism and white nationalism.
As for whether Antifa is a threat to domestic security compared to white nationalism, that is a matter of ongoing debate. While some people view Antifa as a violent and extremist group that poses a threat to public safety and order, others argue that the threat of white nationalism and far-right extremism is much more significant and should be a greater focus of law enforcement and government attention.
It is worth noting that the FBI and other law enforcement agencies have identified white nationalism and far-right extremism as significant threats to domestic security, and that these groups have been linked to a number of violent attacks and acts of terrorism in recent years. Antifa, on the other hand, has been linked to relatively few acts of violence, although some of its members have been involved in clashes with far-right groups and law enforcement.
Overall, the question of whether Antifa or white nationalism is a greater threat to domestic security is a complex and contentious issue, and it is important to consider a wide range of perspectives and evidence in order to form an informed opinion.

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

The Online Search Wars Got Scary. Fast.

<p>Microsoft recently released a new version of its search engine Bing that is powered by artificial intelligence software from OpenAI, the maker of the popular chatbot ChatGPT.</p><p>On Valentine’s Day, after a meal with his wife, Kevin Roose, a New York Times technology columnist, had a...

player.fm

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

 

[Ayo]

I’ve been trying to use ChatGPT for the last few months as an alternative to StackExchange and/or looking at documentation. Mostly React code and some data viz and animation JavaScript libraries.

50% of the code it produces is hot garbage. Of that 50%, half of it is literally unusable. And I’m asking it to do some really simple things that don’t rely on context or being aware of the rest of the application.

 

[IIVI]

Good breakdown.

 

[3rdWorld]

Good breakdown.

Google is ass..I can't find shyt on Google.
Even if im starring at it..

 

[3rdWorld]

Some companies are already replacing workers with ChatGPT, despite warnings it shouldn’t be relied on for ‘anything important’​

Nearly half of the U.S. companies currently using OpenAI's ChatGPT say the chatbot has already replaced workers.​

BY
TREY WILLIAMS
February 25, 2023 9:00 AM EST

Nearly half of U.S. companies currently using ChatGPT say the chatbot has already replaced workers. NurPhoto—Getty Images

In the 10 or so days since its grand entrance, ChatGPT has been everywhere: littering Twitter feeds, cluttering promotional emails, igniting ethical debates in schools and newsrooms, infiltrating dinner table discussions—it’s inescapable and apparently already nestling its way into companies’ important business decisions.
OpenAI initially launched ChatGPT toward the end of November, but the artificial intelligence chatbot had its stable release in early February. Earlier this month, job advice platform Resumebuilder.com surveyed 1,000 business leaders who either use or plan to use ChatGPT. It found that nearly half of their companies have implemented the chatbot. And roughly half of this cohort say ChatGPT has already replaced workers at their companies.

“There is a lot of excitement regarding the use of ChatGPT,” Resumebuilder.com’s Chief Career Advisor Stacie Haller says in a statement. “Since this new technology is just ramping up in the workplace, workers need to surely be thinking of how it may affect the responsibilities of their current job. The results of this survey shows that employers are looking to streamline some job responsibilities using ChatGPT.”

Business leaders already using ChatGPT told ResumeBuilders.com say their companies already use ChatGPT for a variety of reasons, including 66% for writing code, 58% for copywriting and content creation, 57% for customer support, and 52% for meeting summaries and other documents.

In the hiring process, 77% of companies using ChatGPT say they use it to help write job descriptions, 66% to draft interview requisitions, and 65% to respond to applications.

“Overall, most business leaders are impressed by ChatGPT’s work,” ResumeBuilder.com wrote in a news release. “Fifty-five percent say the quality of work produced by ChatGPT is ‘excellent,’ while 34% say it’s ‘very good.'”

ChatGPT has its issues​

As gung ho as business leaders appear to be about the potential of ChatGPT, it’s not without its critiques, including concerns regarding cheating and plagiarism, racism and sexism bias, accuracy, and overall questions about how it’s been trained to learn. The Atlantic’s Ian Bogost warned it should be treated as a toy not a tool, and New York Times tech columnist Kevin Roose said that Microsoft’s new A.I. version of its Bing search engine powered by ChatGPT’s OpenAI left him feeling “deeply unsettled” and “even frightened” after a two-hour chat in which it sounded unhinged and somewhat dark.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has previously warned that ChatGPT shouldn’t be relied on for “anything important,” and in a recent series of tweets expressed concerns about the dangers posed by A.I. technology—and the iterations to follow—saying he worried how people of the future will view us.



Of course it was always going to replace you..
For it to not, youd need empathy and understanding from your corporate employers and we can guess how that will go.
Funny how everyone is so obsessed with technology and quick to embrace something that can replace you easily without a salary.
Also, you'll get replaced faster in a Capitalist economy where ethics and empathy for the next man is non existent and profit comes first.
It'll fukk up the workforce of some nations and then get banned when poverty sets in.

 

[Standing on business]

“It’s a tool and not replacement” yea it will be a tool for some but it will be a replacement for a lot more.

 

[KingDanz]

Just got accepted to Bing AI

 

[Memorial Stadium Piru]

The shyt not working for me right now I was using this shyt like Google/my personal therapist

 

[KingDanz]

The shyt not working for me right now I was using this shyt like Google/my personal therapist

yeah ChatGPT is down at the moment for me, I'm using Bing AI at the moment. Might have to pay for the plus

 

[TheGreatMTB]

Some companies are already replacing workers with ChatGPT, despite warnings it shouldn’t be relied on for ‘anything important’​

Nearly half of the U.S. companies currently using OpenAI's ChatGPT say the chatbot has already replaced workers.​

BY
TREY WILLIAMS
February 25, 2023 9:00 AM EST

Nearly half of U.S. companies currently using ChatGPT say the chatbot has already replaced workers. NurPhoto—Getty Images

In the 10 or so days since its grand entrance, ChatGPT has been everywhere: littering Twitter feeds, cluttering promotional emails, igniting ethical debates in schools and newsrooms, infiltrating dinner table discussions—it’s inescapable and apparently already nestling its way into companies’ important business decisions.
OpenAI initially launched ChatGPT toward the end of November, but the artificial intelligence chatbot had its stable release in early February. Earlier this month, job advice platform Resumebuilder.com surveyed 1,000 business leaders who either use or plan to use ChatGPT. It found that nearly half of their companies have implemented the chatbot. And roughly half of this cohort say ChatGPT has already replaced workers at their companies.

“There is a lot of excitement regarding the use of ChatGPT,” Resumebuilder.com’s Chief Career Advisor Stacie Haller says in a statement. “Since this new technology is just ramping up in the workplace, workers need to surely be thinking of how it may affect the responsibilities of their current job. The results of this survey shows that employers are looking to streamline some job responsibilities using ChatGPT.”

Business leaders already using ChatGPT told ResumeBuilders.com say their companies already use ChatGPT for a variety of reasons, including 66% for writing code, 58% for copywriting and content creation, 57% for customer support, and 52% for meeting summaries and other documents.

In the hiring process, 77% of companies using ChatGPT say they use it to help write job descriptions, 66% to draft interview requisitions, and 65% to respond to applications.

“Overall, most business leaders are impressed by ChatGPT’s work,” ResumeBuilder.com wrote in a news release. “Fifty-five percent say the quality of work produced by ChatGPT is ‘excellent,’ while 34% say it’s ‘very good.'”

ChatGPT has its issues​

As gung ho as business leaders appear to be about the potential of ChatGPT, it’s not without its critiques, including concerns regarding cheating and plagiarism, racism and sexism bias, accuracy, and overall questions about how it’s been trained to learn. The Atlantic’s Ian Bogost warned it should be treated as a toy not a tool, and New York Times tech columnist Kevin Roose said that Microsoft’s new A.I. version of its Bing search engine powered by ChatGPT’s OpenAI left him feeling “deeply unsettled” and “even frightened” after a two-hour chat in which it sounded unhinged and somewhat dark.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has previously warned that ChatGPT shouldn’t be relied on for “anything important,” and in a recent series of tweets expressed concerns about the dangers posed by A.I. technology—and the iterations to follow—saying he worried how people of the future will view us.



Of course it was always going to replace you..
For it to not, youd need empathy and understanding from your corporate employers and we can guess how that will go.
Funny how everyone is so obsessed with technology and quick to embrace something that can replace you easily without a salary.
Also, you'll get replaced faster in a Capitalist economy where ethics and empathy for the next man is non existent and profit comes first.
It'll fukk up the workforce of some nations and then get banned when poverty sets in.

I've been saying for month ChatGPT is a threat to the average corp employee because it'll be more consistent than them...but people weren't trying to hear it (not on here...homies and peers in person.)


The layoffs we're seeing now will never be refilled. In a decade it's gonna be bleak for a lot of people.

 

[SCJoe]

Some companies are already replacing workers with ChatGPT, despite warnings it shouldn’t be relied on for ‘anything important’​

Nearly half of the U.S. companies currently using OpenAI's ChatGPT say the chatbot has already replaced workers.​

BY
TREY WILLIAMS
February 25, 2023 9:00 AM EST

Nearly half of U.S. companies currently using ChatGPT say the chatbot has already replaced workers. NurPhoto—Getty Images

In the 10 or so days since its grand entrance, ChatGPT has been everywhere: littering Twitter feeds, cluttering promotional emails, igniting ethical debates in schools and newsrooms, infiltrating dinner table discussions—it’s inescapable and apparently already nestling its way into companies’ important business decisions.
OpenAI initially launched ChatGPT toward the end of November, but the artificial intelligence chatbot had its stable release in early February. Earlier this month, job advice platform Resumebuilder.com surveyed 1,000 business leaders who either use or plan to use ChatGPT. It found that nearly half of their companies have implemented the chatbot. And roughly half of this cohort say ChatGPT has already replaced workers at their companies.

“There is a lot of excitement regarding the use of ChatGPT,” Resumebuilder.com’s Chief Career Advisor Stacie Haller says in a statement. “Since this new technology is just ramping up in the workplace, workers need to surely be thinking of how it may affect the responsibilities of their current job. The results of this survey shows that employers are looking to streamline some job responsibilities using ChatGPT.”

Business leaders already using ChatGPT told ResumeBuilders.com say their companies already use ChatGPT for a variety of reasons, including 66% for writing code, 58% for copywriting and content creation, 57% for customer support, and 52% for meeting summaries and other documents.

In the hiring process, 77% of companies using ChatGPT say they use it to help write job descriptions, 66% to draft interview requisitions, and 65% to respond to applications.

“Overall, most business leaders are impressed by ChatGPT’s work,” ResumeBuilder.com wrote in a news release. “Fifty-five percent say the quality of work produced by ChatGPT is ‘excellent,’ while 34% say it’s ‘very good.'”

ChatGPT has its issues​

As gung ho as business leaders appear to be about the potential of ChatGPT, it’s not without its critiques, including concerns regarding cheating and plagiarism, racism and sexism bias, accuracy, and overall questions about how it’s been trained to learn. The Atlantic’s Ian Bogost warned it should be treated as a toy not a tool, and New York Times tech columnist Kevin Roose said that Microsoft’s new A.I. version of its Bing search engine powered by ChatGPT’s OpenAI left him feeling “deeply unsettled” and “even frightened” after a two-hour chat in which it sounded unhinged and somewhat dark.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has previously warned that ChatGPT shouldn’t be relied on for “anything important,” and in a recent series of tweets expressed concerns about the dangers posed by A.I. technology—and the iterations to follow—saying he worried how people of the future will view us.



Of course it was always going to replace you..
For it to not, youd need empathy and understanding from your corporate employers and we can guess how that will go.
Funny how everyone is so obsessed with technology and quick to embrace something that can replace you easily without a salary.
Also, you'll get replaced faster in a Capitalist economy where ethics and empathy for the next man is non existent and profit comes first.
It'll fukk up the workforce of some nations and then get banned when poverty sets in.

I posted first hand about a breh who was letting me know about this like a month ago and dudes thought it was a game.

 

[newarkhiphop]

The shyt not working for me right now I was using this shyt like Google/my personal therapist

Same for me, plus member too

 

[Roid Jones]

I used it for the first time this weekend, it's wild and scary