You don’t get it, Jordan wasn’t MJ cause of any stat/accomplishments/talent. It was because of who he was as a competitor. Nobody has ever seen that before in a basketball player. It’s the same fascination people have with Lions and Tigers, they are not just big cats, they kill as apex predatorsThe team representing Jordan negotiated with Nike to focus their marketing campaign on him, rather than the shoe, before his rookie season even started.
Yes, MJ was an amazing player, but let's not forget that he was the #3 pick in the draft, we're not even talking about a consensus #1. But it was a combination of right timing (the 1980s were the perfect time to start personality-driven marketing), the right team behind him (if they hadn't pushed for an MJ-focused campaign, Nike would have done a traditional campaign), AND being a generational player.
It happens all the time, but the ecosystem is far more flooded now. Back in the 1980s you had Nike's marketing team, you had the NBA itself, you had ESPN, and you had their broadcast partners. 90% of the national sports scene was driven by that small group, and they all had a vested interest in pushing Jordan. As cable talk shows proliferated and the internet became important, suddenly you had a lot more voices out there, and half of them are as interested in tearing down players as they are in pumping them up.
You don’t get it, Jordan wasn’t MJ cause of any stat/accomplishments/talent. It was because of who he was as a competitor. Nobody has ever seen that before in a basketball player. It’s the same fascination people have with Lions and Tigers, they are not just big cats, they kill as apex predators
My favorite player is Kobe
You've reached peak stanhood, your favorite player is now officially mythical.
Breh, if you were both in 1975 then you were 12 years old when that season started, if you were born in 1979 then you were 8. There was zero chance that you were watching a game at 9-10 years old and could see jack shyt about who deserved DPOY from just watching the games, even teenagers are pretty ignorant about the intricacies of the game, much less children.
There were only 15 nationally televised regular season NBA games on network TV that year. A few more on cable, but not many. It's unlikely that you saw more than 1-2 Houston or Utah games that entire year, if even that.
So you were going by stat lines just like we are now, except we have 10x as much information.
And we KNOW that MJ's stat lines were false now. Back in 1988, you thought they were legit.
MJ got ZERO votes for the All-Defensive teams the year before this breh. He ONLY became a candidate when he started bytching about deserving the award. So clearly your memory is faulty.
MJ was great, but he was also the beneficiary of the biggest advertizing campaign starting from his rookie year. Of course he was the guy who "walked on water", you were besieged by a CONSTANT stream of advertizements telling you that he was different. No matter how good Michael Cooper or Mark Eaton or Hakeem Olajuwon were at defense, they weren't getting no ads like that.
So what makes you think, as a 9-10 year old inundated by that much advertizing and knowing so little about the defensive side of the game, that you could be objective at all regarding this issue?
I was 11 and knew everything about players, from their colleges to their stat lines, breh. If you weren’t in diapers when MJ retired, you’d understand what we saw.
You can dissect YouTube vids all you want, but we lived through the whole season. Ask anyone who grew up watching basketball in the 80s—they'll tell you MJ was an experience. You can revise history, but you can’t change the facts.
He left a lasting impression that no marketing could fabricate. It didn't matter if there were 15 televised games or 50—if you saw him once, you'd never forget. You don't need to watch Tyson's previous 20 fights to know he was a wrecking ball. all you had to do was watch berbick or sphinx fight.
back to DPOY, 3.2 steals/1.6assts are DPOY worthy no matter how you slice it. just deal with it.
I was the same age during MJ's first run that you were in 1988, but I'm self-aware enough to know that no 11-year-old in the country can evaluate the DPOY race based on just 15 nationally televised games across the whole league.
Take a fukking psychology class breh, you'll realize that "living though the experience" is all about perception, it's the OPPOSITE of "facts".
People who lived through the Reagan years thought he was the greatest president, how did that turn out?
Thank you for proving my point for me.
Holy shyt, did you really say this after it was already proven the 3.2 steals / 1.6 blocks never even happened?
We have peak example of an MJ stan's connection to reality in this comment.
You are fighting on the wrong side of history, and for what, to push Lebron’s propaganda as goat? He had 21+ years to prove that he is greater than MJ and came up short. He hasn’t made any meaningful impact on the league outside of benefiting himself. Who wants to be like Lebron in terms of play style?I was the same age during MJ's first run that you were in 1988, but I'm self-aware enough to know that no 11-year-old in the country can evaluate the DPOY race based on just 15 nationally televised games across the whole league.
Take a fukking psychology class breh, you'll realize that "living though the experience" is all about perception, it's the OPPOSITE of "facts".
People who lived through the Reagan years thought he was the greatest president, how did that turn out?
Thank you for proving my point for me.
Holy shyt, did you really say this after it was already proven the 3.2 steals / 1.6 blocks never even happened?
We have peak example of an MJ stan's connection to reality in this comment.
When you watch the game like I do, the best defense isn't just about steals, blocks, or rebounds. It's about the play itself. Was Bruce Bowen the DPOY in 2004? Honestly, he deserved it more than Ben Wallace, even though Bowen didn't have the stats to back it up. Stats aren't the real measure of DPOY.
back to DPOY, 3.2 steals/1.6assts are DPOY worthy no matter how you slice it. just deal with it.
oh by the way, Jordan's road stats of 2.1 steals and 1.2 blocks in 88 are higher than Brons 2013 season averages. That's the year everyone says he got robbed of DPOY.
In 1988, the DPOY award was only in its sixth year, still relatively new and being figured out by many, breh.
And since it's a highly subjective award, why would anybody question the results now? Oh wait, this is a hit piece by Klutch Sports, so never mind.
But Jordan tried to claim it did, that's why he was bytching in 1987 that Cooper shouldn't have won the DPOY because he had more steals than Cooper did. Jordan argued from the EXACT ignorant viewpoint that you're trying to attribute to me.
And lol, the audacity of you saying this after you've already said:
You can't spend half the thread arguing that steal/block totals are the reason MJ deserves DPOY, then turn around and admit that steal/block totals aren't the measure of real defense.
That's what I've already pointed out in this thread.
In the late 1980s, the award was frequently just given to the guy with the highest steals/blocks, not the best defender. From 1984-85 to 1988-89, DPOY went to the league leader in steals/blocks EVERY year except 1987. And that one year that it didn't go to the league leader.......Jordan bytched about that fact and complained that he should have won because he had more steals.
Jordan complained that his steal/block #'s were DPOY worthy in 1987, Jordan went out of his way to statpad steals/blocks in 1988, his scorekeeper straight cheated to inflate his totals, and if he doesn't lead the league in steals with an impressive block total, he wouldn't have won DPOY>
Hakeem had a far greater impact on defense that year than Jordan did. His team was just as good defensively as the Bulls even though his teammates weren't as good on that end. Ewing and Eaton likely deserved it more too.
Tom Haberstroh isn't Klutch, and the results are questioned because no one did it yet. Y'all are flailing right now.