Uhhh Tatum already had his breakout performances in magic Mike, and jump street films.
People love channing now. It was the opposite before those films.
X-Men Release Date Shake-Up: Deadpool 2 moves May, New Mutants to Feb 2019, Gambit to June 2019
- Thread starter Brandeezy
- Start date
People love channing now. It was the opposite before those films.
Are you suggesting gambit was more popular than spider man or batman in the 90s? Hell venom and possibly spawn >>gambit in the 90s.
Deadline is saying he left cause of scheduling. So it wasn’t “creative differences.” My thought is the script still wasn’t ready and he wanted to move on to other stuff. Similar to Donner when he wanted to direct lost boys but couldn’t keep waiting so he did lethal weapon instead
Ryan Reynolds had damn near 12 straight years of flops before DeadpoolGambit is just as big as Cap and Thor in your eyes?
And I see what you're saying about RDJ being hindsight, but I think you're missing me. I'm saying it was RDJ's breakout performance that pushed the MCU fwd
Have you seen a Channing Tatum movie before? you really think he's about to have a breakout performance as Gambit?
im pretty sure hes talking xmen. and spawn was a joke
Days of Future Piff
Superstar
Gambit doesn't really need his own movie, IMO. He works better as part of an ensemble.
I don't have a lot of high hopes for that Kitty Pryde movie they just announced, either.
The issue with X-men is that the family/team aspect is what makes the whole thing work. The X-men aren't the Avengers and they're not the Justice League. Most of them weren't designed to function independently as their own characters with their own solo stories and rogues galleries. Thor, Captain America, and Iron Man were all their own characters with their own stories before the Avengers took off for example.
Wolverine and Deadpool are the exceptions since they're among the few characters to have any truly classic solo stories that stood the test of time. While there are definitely some solo stories/series that I like from the other characters (Lifedeath 1 and 2 for example), the rest of the X-men don't really have any objectively super-classic solo stories that measure up to the original Frank Miller Wolverine miniseries, or Barry Windsor-Smith's Weapon X, IMO.
Last edited:
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
Gambit doesn't really need his own movie, IMO. He works better as part of an ensemble.
I don't have a lot of high hopes for that Kitty Pryde they just announced movie either.
The issue with X-men is that the family/team aspect is what makes the whole thing work. The X-men aren't the Avengers and they're not the Justice League. Most of them weren't designed to function independently as their own characters with their own solo stories, their own rogues galleries, etc the way that the Justice League and most of the Avengers were.
Wolverine and Deadpool are the exceptions since they're among the few characters to have any truly classic solo stories that stood the test of time. While there are definitely some solo stories/series that I like from the other characters (Lifedeath 1 and 2 for example), the rest of the X-men don't really have any objectively super-classic solo stories that measure up to the original Frank Miller Wolverine miniseries, or Barry Windsor-Smith's Weapon X, IMO.
this
Y'all really think gambit was more popular than Captain AMERICA??
Brehs... I think y'all are probably confusing "relevancy" with popularity
if you tell me that in the early 90's that Gambit was more RELEVANT than Captain America, I could go with that, because Gambit was a character on a hit cartoon
But in terms of popularity, more ppl knew the name of Captain America than they did Gambit
at no time in history was Gambit ever more popular than Captain America
it's like saying that X-Men were more popular than Superman in the 90's. Not more popular. Just more relevant since they had a hit cartoon series
but Superman (
that boy scout) takes the crown on popularity every day of the weekCaptain America is an iconic character. Gambit isn't.
Bleed The Freak
Superstar
this
Y'all really think gambit was more popular than Captain AMERICA??
Brehs... I think y'all are probably confusing "relevancy" with popularity
if you tell me that in the early 90's that Gambit was more RELEVANT than Captain America, I could go with that, because Gambit was a character on a hit cartoon
But in terms of popularity, more ppl knew the name of Captain America than they did Gambit
at no time in history was Gambit ever more popular than Captain America
it's like saying that X-Men were more popular than Superman in the 90's. Not more popular. Just more relevant since they had a hit cartoon series
but Superman (
Captain America is an iconic character. Gambit isn't.
Of fukking course Cap is more of an icon than fukking Gambit.
Cap was fighting Hitler. I meant in the new millineum.
That being said....It's time for this solo pic to end and place them in the new X-Men merger with Disney.
Last edited:
Days of Future Piff
Superstar
this
Y'all really think gambit was more popular than Captain AMERICA??
Brehs... I think y'all are probably confusing "relevancy" with popularity
if you tell me that in the early 90's that Gambit was more RELEVANT than Captain America, I could go with that, because Gambit was a character on a hit cartoon
But in terms of popularity, more ppl knew the name of Captain America than they did Gambit
at no time in history was Gambit ever more popular than Captain America
it's like saying that X-Men were more popular than Superman in the 90's. Not more popular. Just more relevant since they had a hit cartoon series
but Superman (
Captain America is an iconic character. Gambit isn't.
If we really want to keep it a stack, Gambit is a fad character. Dude's whole existence peaked with the 90's animated series.
I've mentioned several times that Gambit is a character that's all style and not a whole lot of substance.
To be fair, Gambit is VERY good at that first part. His powers are dope and his whole swag is
...But that's all the guy really has going for him. There's not much of anything deeper going on with him beyond that surface level "cool" factor.
Gambit doesn't really have any truly legendary GOAT-tier storylines by himself, and the overwhelming majority of the best X-men stories either have nothing to do with him at all or originally took place years before he first appeared. It's like they saw how popular Logan became and tried to catch lightning-in-a-bottle for the second time, and it didn't last.
Gambit was poppin' in the 90s when he was first created, but it's basically been a wrap for him ever since that decade ended, tbh. Gambit has his moments, but he just doesn't carry that timeless appeal that characters like Spider-man, Wolverine, Captain America, Daredevil, and the Hulk have.
Spawn has the same problem IMO. Like Gambit, he's a fun character, but it's too obvious that he's just this weird amalgamation of a bunch of all these random "cool" tropes from the 90s, which makes both characters next to impossible to take seriously outside of the context of that decade.
Gambit and Spawn are still way cooler and more entertaining than these new-millenium, garbage, Tumblr-feminist characters they're pushing in the comics now though.
Last edited:
Your personal opinion of spawn is irrelevant to how big he was in the 90s.
and he mentioned cap and Thor in the same sentence so he wasn't just talking about x men.
Im a huge Gambit fan. He’s actually the only thing about the Fox X-Verse that I was anticipating.
I had faith in Channing Tatum doing him justice too
I mean honestly what the fukk us so hard about adapting Gambit’s storyline
the shyt writes itself. His origin story is basically Romeo & Juliet set against an epic Thieves Guild backdrop. Your telling me they can, more or less, get an Old Man Logan adaptation right but can’t do fukking GAMBIT!??!!
THREE directors have been through this film? What the fukk kinda script did they shyt out for THREE directors to go “Naw bro. I’m good”
I had faith in Channing Tatum doing him justice too
I mean honestly what the fukk us so hard about adapting Gambit’s storyline
the shyt writes itself. His origin story is basically Romeo & Juliet set against an epic Thieves Guild backdrop. Your telling me they can, more or less, get an Old Man Logan adaptation right but can’t do fukking GAMBIT!??!!THREE directors have been through this film? What the fukk kinda script did they shyt out for THREE directors to go “Naw bro. I’m good”
Bleed The Freak
Superstar
Im a huge Gambit fan. He’s actually the only thing about the Fox X-Verse that I was anticipating.
I had faith in Channing Tatum doing him justice too
I mean honestly what the fukk us so hard about adapting Gambit’s storyline
THREE directors have been through this film? What the fukk kinda script did they shyt out for THREE directors to go “Naw bro. I’m good”
Romeo/Juliet mixed with Thomas Crown/Femme Fatale in a Crow setting...unreal they can't get it right.
Neo. The Only. The One.
THE ONE
Best thing about Gambit was the future "who betrayed the X-men" story arc
let's keep it a buck
and if they had found some way to tie that in to DOFP with some Bishop beef
I would've been there for that Day 1
but oh well
let's keep it a buck
and if they had found some way to tie that in to DOFP with some Bishop beef
I would've been there for that Day 1
but oh well