WTF HAPPENED WHY IS CHICAGO SO VIOLENT?

Marti

Tete status
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
7,603
Reputation
5,779
Daps
33,215
Reppin
290
Chicago aint really all that violent compared to St. Louis, NO, Baltimore, Detroit, etc.
This !!

I live in the heart of the city and it’s plenty of areas in Chicago where virtually no crime isn’t committed

THE media sensationalize shyt
 

Geek Nasty

Brain Knowledgeably Whizzy
Supporter
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
31,074
Reputation
5,154
Daps
117,178
Reppin
South Kakalaka

invalid

Veteran
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
19,973
Reputation
6,807
Daps
80,793
nikkas was living in slums in Chicago before welfare.....And doing drive bys on nikkas..
There was a black middle black middle class tho
IN PICTURES: Scenes From Chicago's Slums In 1954 - The Chicagoist
http://time.com



07_112707439.jpg

11_112705848.jpg

15_00977457.jpg
17_00977464.jpg

18_112670588.jpg

20_112669443.jpg


:picard:
Never really seen that part of black Chicago.

Contrast that against a photo of Easter Sunday taken at my family's church around the same time period and probably a stone's throw away from where these slum photos were taken......

7ce3702c6134567f5850abac42a206a7.jpg



Fast forward, went to pick up my grandparents this past Sunday at this same church and was greeted by this outside.

IMG-3367.jpg


Never seen anything like this before.
Back in the day, this neighborhood was where the "fashionable negroes" lived.
Now it's colloquially known as "Murder Row" and where Chief Keef grew up.

The most tripped out thing was this striking juxtaposition of the black people outside the walls of that church and the black people that are inside.
It wasn't until this moment that I realized that you can have black people right next to each other but be so socially removed, that the one is totally oblivious of the other.

Folks be talking about we need more blacks with money to move back to the black community....Tripped out part is blacks with money are already there. Ya'll just don't know it. And they want to keep it that way.
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,500
Daps
37,705
Excuses... being poor doesnt mean you have to murder eachother...
Gross economic inequality is the cause of violence. When you add in the ability to access weapons. You are going to have an eureka moment every single time.
 
Joined
May 14, 2013
Messages
2,303
Reputation
1,669
Daps
10,110
Reppin
NULL
Chicago isnt even top 10 in homicides per capita

NOLA
St Lou
Memphis
Jackson, MS
Baltimore

Wayyyyy more violent

Even fukkn Rockford more dangerous

What folks don't realize is that every big city has nice and areas and bad areas. Even Baltimore has rich neighborhoods with next to no crime. Yes, Baltimore. And the irony is that these top ten dangerous cities are usually chocolate cities that are run by black folks and have better opportunities for black owned businesses and have black middle class areas.

The crime rate of an entire big city is based on a citywide average. If your city has more hood areas than middle class and wealthy areas, the overall crime rate for the city will appear to be higher. The only reason Baltimore has a higher overall crime rate than Chicago is that Baltimore has less middle class and rich areas compared to the world class city of Chicago where the low crime rates of the middle class and rich areas offset the high crime rates of the Southside. If Southside Chicago were an independent city, it would probably have a higher crime rate than Baltimore.

The difference between Baltimore and Chicago is that Chicago is a world class city and Baltimore is a second tier ghetto city. But the hood is bad in every city, and if it's not, it's only not that bad anymore because of gentrification. And saying that Chicago hoods are not as dangerous as Baltimore hoods is a fukking lie because both hoods in both cities have the same problems, stupid. Looking at numbers doesn't mean shyt on some level. If you living in a hood with constant gun violence and killing it don't matter what city it is.:snoop: Why do you think street level rap music emerged from so many otherwise unknown places back in the 90's? Places that never made a top ten most dangerous cities list. Snoop didn't have to bust out LBC stats for you to know they was active out there. Pimp C didn't have to write city data raps for you to know it was mainey in Port Arthur.

You can't go off of the overall crime stats for an entire city to know whether the entire city is fukking safe or not. :snoop:For instance, historically, San Francisco is a crappier place to live for black folks in terms of living in the hood than Oakland because most blacks in SF stay in the projects and SF projects are some of the worst rated on the country. SF even had a higher murder rate for blacks than Oakland for years until SF started tearing down some of the more infamous projects in Hunter Point, SF. Most murder in most big cities is black on black so studying the black murder rate is more telling of how bad a city is for black folks to live in.

S.F. more deadly than Oakland for blacks?

There's a reason why San Francisco has had the worst case of black flight of any big city in America. But you wouldn't know any of that just looking at the overall crime rates of big cities. Stay woke.:sas2:
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,437
Daps
17,422
Chicago needs Batman and tanks patrolling the streets with cameras on every street lamp
 

UberEatsDriver

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
44,109
Reputation
3,089
Daps
99,222
Reppin
Brooklyn keeps on taking it.
What folks don't realize is that every big city has nice and areas and bad areas. Even Baltimore has rich neighborhoods with next to no crime. Yes, Baltimore. And the irony is that these top ten dangerous cities are usually chocolate cities that are run by black folks and have better opportunities for black owned businesses and have black middle class areas.

The crime rate of an entire big city is based on a citywide average. If your city has more hood areas than middle class and wealthy areas, the overall crime rate for the city will appear to be higher. The only reason Baltimore has a higher overall crime rate than Chicago is that Baltimore has less middle class and rich areas compared to the world class city of Chicago where the low crime rates of the middle class and rich areas offset the high crime rates of the Southside. If Southside Chicago were an independent city, it would probably have a higher crime rate than Baltimore.

The difference between Baltimore and Chicago is that Chicago is a world class city and Baltimore is a second tier ghetto city. But the hood is bad in every city, and if it's not, it's only not that bad anymore because of gentrification. And saying that Chicago hoods are not as dangerous as Baltimore hoods is a fukking lie because both hoods in both cities have the same problems, stupid. Looking at numbers doesn't mean shyt on some level. If you living in a hood with constant gun violence and killing it don't matter what city it is.:snoop: Why do you think street level rap music emerged from so many otherwise unknown places back in the 90's? Places that never made a top ten most dangerous cities list. Snoop didn't have to bust out LBC stats for you to know they was active out there. Pimp C didn't have to write city data raps for you to know it was mainey in Port Arthur.

You can't go off of the overall crime stats for an entire city to know whether the entire city is fukking safe or not. :snoop:For instance, historically, San Francisco is a crappier place to live for black folks in terms of living in the hood than Oakland because most blacks in SF stay in the projects and SF projects are some of the worst rated on the country. SF even had a higher murder rate for blacks than Oakland for years until SF started tearing down some of the more infamous projects in Hunter Point, SF. Most murder in most big cities is black on black so studying the black murder rate is more telling of how bad a city is for black folks to live in.

S.F. more deadly than Oakland for blacks?

There's a reason why San Francisco has had the worst case of black flight of any big city in America. But you wouldn't know any of that just looking at the overall crime rates of big cities. Stay woke.:sas2:

Crime stats should only reflect neighborhoods. I think it’s retarded that they only reflect cities and this causes a lot of ignorant thinking.
 

Rakim Allah

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
13,286
Reputation
2,237
Daps
22,243
Reppin
Los Angeles

Booker T Garvey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
29,744
Reputation
3,952
Daps
124,177
I always feel these discussions should be spearheaded by people who actually live in these cities, same for Baltimore and Atlanta :hubie:

But as an outsider I’ll say this about Chicago - it’s the high number of senseless murders that’s alarming. Dudes killing each other over YouTube videos and songs?

And some of those music videos are so demonic, just waving guns and cussing every other word with tats covering their faces - they’ve just given up on life so young. :picard:
 

Trot LaRoc

Superstar
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
11,456
Reputation
1,401
Daps
35,926
Reppin
Chi/LA
I always feel these discussions should be spearheaded by people who actually live in these cities, same for Baltimore and Atlanta :hubie:

But as an outsider I’ll say this about Chicago - it’s the high number of senseless murders that’s alarming. Dudes killing each other over YouTube videos and songs?

And some of those music videos are so demonic, just waving guns and cussing every other word with tats covering their faces - they’ve just given up on life so young. :picard:

Most murders regardless of race or region are senseless. Just bc some rappers have chosen to make youtube videos about it...now the whole city of Chicago gotta take this fake rep of being a murder capital.

Misguided ppl are killing and doin the same shyt in the east, west and south too.
 
Top