I do think you guys are wrong about the fact that it means a woman isn't interested though. It could just mean she's used to dudes who don't care if she responds in a timely manner or at all to every text. And based on the responses in this thread can you blame women for that? Plus how interested can you really be in somebody that you don't know? So the fact a woman isn't thirsty over a complete stranger shouldn't be a reason to dead her imo. Plus its kind of weak on you dudes part,just for the fact you take issue with it,but you never address it. If you have standards that a woman should reply to you in a reasonable time frame,why would you not just let that be known upfront? You don't have to be a ass about it to address it. Some women will not appreciate you trying to "check" them. But the ones that like you will usually try to correct their behavior or will correct it. People are going to assume they can do with you,what they were able to do with their previous. As men its your job to tell every person that comes into your life,of your standards upfront if they cross a line,or do something you take issue with. It is somewhat feminine and passive aggressive to take issue and be tight about a woman not responding,but just ghosting rather than take a chance of coming off needy.
Because telling a woman you need her to text back faster,she could look at you like a clown,,controlling,or thirsty ass nikka
. But so what?Thats her problem. If you do it right you won't come off that way to reasonable women. If she cop a attitude,it will feel even better to dead her
I have no problem texting a "uggh...hello
?" if I don't get a text back and I'm waiting.
