Women Don't Know Where They Land On The Attractiveness Scale

[Black Nate Grey]

In terms of this superficial society

Because for the most part that's all women really have going for them. Partly due to social conditioning.

If you are a guy and not that attractive/tall, you can compensate by accumulating wealth, resources and power so you'll still be able to bag women of sufficient quality.

If a woman isn't attractive she can still get laid but she will not get commitment, only occasional booty calls and pump and dumps. Plus the fact they prob won't be seen in public with duke much less public knowledge of them fukking.
The only way to circumvent this that I know of is if they are extremely feminine in demeanour then looks for the most part can be put on the backseat.

 

[Youseenmywork]

The 1-30 Scale

Here is an explanation of the 1-30 scale I believe was invented by comedian Patrice O'Neal.

The scale is simple and replaces the 1-10 scale. The 1-10 scale seems easy and practical to use but you always find yourself wanting to put a decimal after the whole number. It also gets in a gray area around the 5-7 range because if you give a girl a six, then it seems like she could be uglier than what she is because it's almost a five, which would be average. Anything below a five just is thought to be below average and untouchable, but some fours could possibly be ok. But if you give a girl a seven because you think she's better than a "six", then you kind of bring down the value of a true seven and this is where the 1-30 scale makes up for all that.

Think of the 1-30 scale broken up into three parts:

1-10 = Ugly Women

11-20 = Average Women

21-30 = Hot Women

So you essentially have three 1-10 scales but they are based on what type of person they are. Once you determine what group a certain woman belongs to, you can then give her a rating in her scale. Since you have already determined if she is ugly, average, or hot, there is no need for decimals or devaluing the scale. So for example, you may think that a cashier at grocery store may be cute. Well most likely she will falls into the ugly group, but she's on the high end of the ugly group scale, so a nine or 10. You'd through her a bone, but on a 1-10 scale, you'd probably only give her a 3 or 4, which again, is untouchable. Someone like Natalie Portman would obviously be in the Hot Women category and would most likely in the upper region of her respected scale. I would say some people in this group would consider her a 30. She would be a hot "hot" person. Let's say there was someone in your office name ****** she's the most attractive female in your office, but in reality, she's average, but you'd give her a 18 or 19, because she's a hot average person. This should all be very simple to understand.

Now there is one thing that the 1-30 scale has in common with the 1-10 scale. They both can be shown on a bell curve of hotness against likelihood you're going to hook up with her for one reason or another.

 

[SheWantTheD]

This is patently false. A man may know his level and still feel attracted to, pursue and chase women above his level. Men feel like this is the right of being men.

I thought this was pretty much common knowledge.
Why guys go for outta-their-league ladies
(Edit: By the way, I don't believe in levels...)

Personally I don't have a problem with it if the same men weren't actively encouraging women to lower their looks standards or shaming them for wanting above their level as well and vice versa.

The main people complaining about the opposite sex being too picky are ALWAYS unwilling to evaluate the absurdity of their own standards.
Why not encourage both men AND women to improve themselves to get what they desire, while also being open to the idea that he/she may not look the way u fantasized.

On average no men don't. If a bad chick walks into a classroom 1 or 2 guys are gonna shoot their shot at her. But if you put a handsome man in a classroom 80% of the women in that room will try to get at him in some way. I have seen it happen in real life many times.

And the whole you don't believe in levels is bs. Physical attractiveness is distinguishable, the number system is just a way to measure it. It very much exists.

 

[⠝⠕⠏⠑]

On average no men don't. If a bad chick walks into a classroom 1 or 2 guys are gonna shoot their shot at her. But if you put a handsome man in a classroom 80% of the women in that room will try to get at him in some way. I have seen it happen in real life many times.

I've seen the opposite happen. Guys from all walks of life will fall over a dyme even to the extent of stalking. If a man is super fine, however, many women will write him off as a player or too much and keep it pushing.
Interesting to see different perspectives tho.

 

[NotAnFBIagent]

1. Reggie Bush - 6.9259 (here)
2. Chris Mccullough - 6.8888 (here)
3. @The Wave - 6.869 (here)
4. Keith Powers - 6.818 (here)
5. Clarence White - 6.809 (here)
6. Tinie Tempah -6.733 (here)
7. D'Angelo - 6.714 (here)
8. Jeff Logan - 6.6818 (here)
9. Cam'Ron - 6.625 (here)
10. Big K.R.I.T. - 6.625 (here)
11. Lil' B - 6.6 (here)
12. Dave East - 6.588 (here)
13. Lorenzo Cromwell - 6.571 (here)
14. @CokeMoneyGuns - 6.5652 (here)
15. Ice Cube - 6.5333 (here)
16. Marquise - 6.5333 (here)
17. Jay Elliss - 6.466 (here)
18. Nelly - 6.46 (here)
19. @charmander - 6.434 (here)
20. Omarion Ryan - 6.35 (here)
21. Nnamdi Asomugha - 6.285 (here)
22. Rick Gonzalez - 6.125 (here)
23. Marc Lamont Hill - 6.09 (here)
24. Omar Epps - 6.05 (here)
25. Majak Daw - 6.04 (here)
26. Godth - 6 (here)

Men 6s.

No homo but all those dudes not 6s
Reggie Bush
Nelly
Omar Epps
They literally got male models on there

See the coli ladies got skewed ratings too


Lets see how they would rate themselves

 

[SheWantTheD]

Hard for me to divorce the two. I immediately wanna know what u are like if I find u physically attractive. I've run into far too many attractive people whose personalities literally made them do NOTHING for me. I don't even know how to describe it. Not saying looks aren't important but u can fine and still ugly.

you can find someone physically attractive and not want anything to do with them because for example a big age gap.

 

[Ol’Otis]

Regardless of how someone may rate me, I know Im the total package and bring a lot to the table so I operate as such. Looks aren't even a 4th of what makes a person worth the effort.

I'm pretty sure ur fine ass do

You not from Harlem though

 

[SheWantTheD]

Most people judge/are critical of others vs themselves.
Look at Religions.

I agree but people are also critical of themselves too, many times unnecessarily.

 

[Aphrodite]

No homo but all those dudes not 6s
Reggie Bush
Nelly
Omar Epps
They literally got male models on there

See the coli ladies got skewed ratings too


Lets see how they would rate themselves

Mario Lopez was rated a 5.
Jeremy Meeks (Mugshot guy) rated a 5 (lower than David Banner). Cedric The Entertainer even rated higher than Jeremy Meeks.
Lil Fizz was rated a 5.

A lot of it was based on if the guys were light skinned too. It got points/ratings deducted. Majority of the top rated men are dark skinned.

 

[SheWantTheD]

These bytches gave Reggie Bush a 6.

Dude is a Millionaire, NFL running back, peak physical condition, dark skinned, college educated breh, and he's a 6.

Breh's this is why you don't ever let a female offer input on the dating game or looks.

These fat, moon faced, box built bytches on here wouldn't even get a hi in real life from a halfway decent dude and they're giving someone in the top 1% of men a 6/10.

 

[Biscayne]

You'd be shocked that a lot of decent women don't really get the attention the way we think they get it.

In other words, men aren't as thirsty as they think we are?

 

[Tenchi Ryu]

In other words, men aren't as thirsty as they think we are?

When facts enters discussion

 

[SheWantTheD]

I've seen the opposite happen. Guys from all walks of life will fall over a dyme even to the extent of stalking. If a man is super fine, however, many women will write him off as a player or too much and keep it pushing.
Interesting to see different perspectives tho.

There's a difference between infatuation and feeling as if you can get that guy/you are on his level looks wise.

Most men aren't stalkers or obsess over women in unhealthy ways.

 

[NotAnFBIagent]

Mario Lopez was rated a 5.
Jeremy Meeks (Mugshot guy) rated a 5 (lower than David Banner). Cedric The Entertainer even rated higher than Jeremy Meeks.
Lil Fizz was rated a 5.

A lot of it was based on if the guys were light skinned too. It got points/ratings deducted. Majority of the top rated men are dark skinned.

In other words these ratings are bullshyt

 

[⠝⠕⠏⠑]

No homo but all those dudes not 6s
Reggie Bush
Nelly
Omar Epps
They literally got male models on there

See the coli ladies got skewed ratings too


Lets see how they would rate themselves

But at some point you have to account for the sheer diversity of female hormones and what they are attracted to. Men seem to have more homegenized and codified rules for what is deemed attractive in a woman. Ass, titties, nice face, in shape. And there are men who like different things but the reason why IG keeps spitting out carbon copies is because there is a loose formula to what men find attractive.

For women however, attraction goes beyond just the physical. It's what the look exudes. And it's frustrating because I can't describe this phenomenon so as a man ya'll are gonna think I'm nuts. Lmao! There are hundreds of looks I could describe that would be appealing to me on some level. Unless a man has universal appeal, there will always be entire demographics of women who are "meh" about what other groups of chicks legit worship. I know chicks who like dudes with beards and big bellies, much to the frustration of dudes who work out daily trying to get cut.

It's so hard to explain but what makes ur p*ssy clench isn't necessarily what is classically considered to be physically attractive all the time.