Will the United States survive a constitutional crisis?

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,364
Reputation
6,247
Daps
168,093
No they aren’t. But they are our direct competitors.

by common foe, I don’t mean China per se. Just any foe. The system we have right now can’t be changed.
We don’t need to be competing with anyone. This mentality is why America is in the state it is now.

When global warming makes disasters a common occurance and temperatures rise, we won’t be talking about competing with China.
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,337
Reputation
18,390
Daps
235,416
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
Robust democratic socialist policies would benefit the people en masse, but I doubt it would have any significant effect on racist/fascist attitudes in America.

Even in places like Sweden where they live way better than we do and have so many more basic living amenities, nativism and white nationalism is on the rise.

If Bernie Sanders got all his policies through somehow, MAGAs would just get mad because Black people have free healthcare, quality education, a living wage, public college, etc. even though their own lives would be better.

While this may be true it also doesn’t mean that you don’t do those things. Even if we took all the racial shyt out of it the shyt makes sense in terms of this country’s long term success.
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,337
Reputation
18,390
Daps
235,416
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
We’re too deep in the abyss to pull back breh…only we unite is against a common foe.

China is poised to take this shyt over. Their government allows them to be efficient in a way that we’ll never be.

…..and that’s a fundamental flaw in America’s design. The need to dehumanize another group to spur progress. No one is suggesting that China is some benevolent force but as Americans we’d be hypocritical as fukk to point fingers knowing that our own country is the primary reason why things are fukked up.
 

ColdSlither

Extensive Enterprises
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
7,347
Reputation
1,134
Daps
27,099
Reppin
Elizabeth, NJ by way of East Orange
Robust democratic socialist policies would benefit the people en masse, but I doubt it would have any significant effect on racist/fascist attitudes in America.

Even in places like Sweden where they live way better than we do and have so many more basic living amenities, nativism and white nationalism is on the rise.

If Bernie Sanders got all his policies through somehow, MAGAs would just get mad because Black people have free healthcare, quality education, a living wage, public college, etc. even though their own lives would be better.

The bolded is the source of so many problems. After the civil rights act is when these things started to erode. If it wasn't for racism there probably would have been free healthcare in this country decades ago.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,012
Daps
132,750
The bolded is the source of so many problems. After the civil rights act is when these things started to erode. If it wasn't for racism there probably would have been free healthcare in this country decades ago.
America would be a democratic socialist nation if it wasn’t for racism of whites.

FDR gave Europe the blueprint and they ran with it. You have to ask how in a few decades, Europe became way better at democratic socialism than America even though America got the ball rolling first.

Black people were largely excluded from the New Deal, and white people spent the next 5 or 6 decades still complaining about them having too much.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,012
Daps
132,750
We don’t need to be competing with anyone. This mentality is why America is in the state it is now.

When global warming makes disasters a common occurance and temperatures rise, we won’t be talking about competing with China.
The whole idea of competition as an ethically sound organizing force for a society and state is so completely fukked up if you think about it, but it’s common wisdom in Murica.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,364
Reputation
6,247
Daps
168,093
The bolded is the source of so many problems. After the civil rights act is when these things started to erode. If it wasn't for racism there probably would have been free healthcare in this country decades ago.
I think it was the Civil Rights era AND the fact that the economy started to erode in the 70s. It’s really both.
 

gho3st

plata or plomo
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
34,653
Reputation
2,795
Daps
83,325
Reppin
2016
…..and that’s a fundamental flaw in America’s design. The need to dehumanize another group to spur progress. No one is suggesting that China is some benevolent force but as Americans we’d be hypocritical as fukk to point fingers knowing that our own country is the primary reason why things are fukked up.
I got a love hate relationship with America. While I understand China is not “an enemy”, I understand the realities of the world: resources are finite. If you don’t position yourself to gather them, somebody else will.
 

gho3st

plata or plomo
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
34,653
Reputation
2,795
Daps
83,325
Reppin
2016
We don’t need to be competing with anyone. This mentality is why America is in the state it is now.

When global warming makes disasters a common occurance and temperatures rise, we won’t be talking about competing with China.
the system this country was built on is flawed and we never took the steps to fix it.

Healthy competition is good. All these big countries view us as competitors. And we should approach it as such. The problem we have is racism has held this country back from delivering on its potential.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,381
Reputation
3,888
Daps
107,495
Reppin
Detroit
While this may be true it also doesn’t mean that you don’t do those things. Even if we took all the racial shyt out of it the shyt makes sense in terms of this country’s long term success.

Sure. It's just that it makes it very difficult to actually do those things when half the populace will vote against them on GP, just because they perceive it as benefiting another group more than theirs.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,364
Reputation
6,247
Daps
168,093
the system this country was built on is flawed and we never took the steps to fix it.

Healthy competition is good. All these big countries view us as competitors. And we should approach it as such. The problem we have is racism has held this country back from delivering on its potential.
Its not healthy competition though.
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,337
Reputation
18,390
Daps
235,416
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
I got a love hate relationship with America. While I understand China is not “an enemy”, I understand the realities of the world: resources are finite. If you don’t position yourself to gather them, somebody else will.

the system this country was built on is flawed and we never took the steps to fix it.

Healthy competition is good. All these big countries view us as competitors. And we should approach it as such. The problem we have is racism has held this country back from delivering on its potential.

I disagree. This philosophy of competition isn’t sustainable in the long term especially when all we have on this green and blue rock is each other.

Cooperation should be the new philosophy for production and resource allocation going into the future. The planet is much smaller thanks to advancements and we’ll reach a point where artificial scarcity and even real scarcity will be a thing of the past. The competition model has ran its course and we’ve got a lot of cleanup to do because of it. We seem to think that a better world is some utopian dream when it’s really just a matter of doing better for ourselves through policies that are better for us collectively.
 
Last edited:

gho3st

plata or plomo
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
34,653
Reputation
2,795
Daps
83,325
Reppin
2016
I disagree. This philosophy of competition isn’t sustainable in the long term especially when all we have on this green and blue rock is each other.

Cooperation should be the new philosophy for production and resource allocation going into the future. The planet is much smaller thanks to advancements and we’ll reach a point where artificial scarcity and even real scarcity will be a thing of the past. The competition model has ran its course and we’ve got a lot of cleanup to do because of it. We seem to thing that a better world is some utopian dream when it’s really just a matter of doing better for ourselves through policies that a better for us collectively.
I agree with you theoretically but I understand reality of things: human nature will never allow that to happen unless faced with a massive catastrophe—-think that’s why @mastermind brought up global warming.

until this catastrophe happens, we’ll be competing for resources :yeshrug:
 
Top