Some of you would make awful jurors because y'all are distracted by the theatrics of the case instead of the known facts. A man was shot about 8 times, many times in his back. That isn't justified just because the victim had a gun in his car. The line for being justified in SYG among the public is getting way too low. This case and the McKnight case displays that
If the perp was white and Fuller wasn't the defense attorney 99% of you would no be rooting for him to get off.
You seem to think your ignorance of the law and basing your opnion on ignorance and emotionalism has an effect on those of us who think logically.
If you pull your gun out in defense (you only have the cover to do so in the event that you think your life is reasonably in danger) if that is the case, it doesn't matter if you shoot once, twice, or 8 times, you fire until the threat is subdued. On top of that if Smith said he was going to get a gun after threatening Hayes and his other friend is already trying to attack him and calling him slurs, Hayes doesn't "owe" him the right to grab the gun and draw down.
So you clearly have no idea what you are talking about.