Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
Begging the question. Why do you assume it was done intentionally? Did anyone from m NASA admit to destroying footage on purpose?

None of the articles about it stated "Ooops our bad, it was accidentally done". What's worst is why was it the most important, most critical piece footage(classified) in NASA history destroyed and not something less important. Not only was the footage destroyed, NASA tech was destroyed as well. No one's bats an eye, no cares.


Again, begging the question, alongside a strawman.

:usure: strawman


No one is arguing that technology was "far greater in 1969 than today". NASA's budget was much bigger back then, and they actually had a supply chain built up to prioritize going to the Moon. Many diagrams for mission critical components weren't owned or controlled by NASA; they worked with aerospace engineers like Boeing to engineer proprietary components for the shuttle. Boeing doesn't manufacture those parts anymore, and has no incentive to. The computer technology of 1969 is also completely incompatible with technology of today. Those statements would have to be massively upgraded.

NASA admits they have no technology to get back to the Moon. That's is who is debating it. However they have the tech to go to Mars as NASA claims.

Boeing isn't doing what?

https://www.kansas.com/news/business/aviation/article20810853.html

Boeing reorganizing plans as it builds second NASA SLS Core Stage engine section - NASASpaceFlight.com


Boeing builds the most powerful rocket ever made

NASA works with dozens of other companies as well including DOD for projects so why is there an real issue with budget?

Many different reasons why we could go to the Moon in 1969, but we can't now.

Again what are these reasons?
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,285
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Pressure said:
If you think that's the point, then you're making my point for me. :Bucketsumad:

Don't bother. Dude is a dishonest, anti-intellectual, fallacy-ridden Flat Earth shill that can't do math and suffers from dyscalculia.

Any argument you make against him will be turned into a strawman that he will shoot down and think he's won the argument.

If that doesn't work, and you actually make him think, he'll put you on ignore and still think he's won.

Dude has NO idea he lost a ban bet against me and proved the Earth couldn't be flat.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/one-of-us-has-to-go.702545/

:snooze:
 

-G$-

...fresh outta fux...
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,267
Reputation
3,801
Daps
22,435
Don't bother. Dude is a dishonest, anti-intellectual, fallacy-ridden Flat Earth shill that can't do math and suffers from dyscalculia.

Any argument you make against him will be turned into a strawman that he will shoot down and think he's won the argument.

If that doesn't work, and you actually make him think, he'll put you on ignore and still think he's won.

Dude has NO idea he lost a ban bet against me and proved the Earth couldn't be flat.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/one-of-us-has-to-go.702545/

:snooze:
:ohhh:
 
Top