Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

tuckgod

The high exalted
Bushed
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
48,571
Reputation
14,780
Daps
180,805
tenor.gif






I'm done entertaining this dude.

tenor.gif

:mjlol:
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
...Yeah, pretty much. :bpunimpressed:



What does this have to do with the Moon landing? :bpunimpressed:




You didn't address sh*t. You answered my initial question with a baseless assertion (Russians faked space travel too) without substantiation.

I then told you that it wasn't a good answer (it still isn't) and in the following post I explained why (you called it "simple", but it leaves too many unanswered questions, which I listed). It's more simple to say we actually landed on the Moon rather than assume Russia faked their space program. You haven't provided any evidence of this; you said it as if it's an accepted fact.

You then asked those two questions you keep bringing up, despite the fact that you have yet to provide any evidence that the Russian space program--and other nation's space programs, for that matter--were fake.

You breezed by that sh*t like you were being rational here. :reallyson:

You were talking out of your ass, and wanted to move on to these questions because you know you can't back that sh*t up. :reallyson:

You talk too much which shows you have narassitic tendancies. Until you answer the 2 questions...dont bother quoting me kid.
 

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
14,112
Reputation
10,443
Daps
73,113
Reppin
Wakanda
You talk too much which shows you have narassitic tendancies.

I don't know what "narassitic tendancies" are, but regardless, this is a weak cop out.

This is why I said:


You've never engaged with my arguments in an honest manner, not without hurling insults or making baseless, unwarranted assumptions about me or what my supposed agenda is.

Why should I waste my time entertaining anything you have to say? :bpunimpressed:

Until you answer the 2 questions

Pretty much solidifies that your response to my question about the Russians was bullsh*t. You won't answer it. (I asked first.) :russ:


dont bother quoting me kid

You can't answer my arguments, and now you're trying to act tough. :bpumad:
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
Cui bono? :bpthink:


1. US govt wins another aspect of Cold War.
2. More support from US public, more funding.

Or does this make more sense to you?

Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits

How We Lost The Ability To Travel To The Moon


Our opponents in the Cold War were the Soviets.

Why have they never disputed the moon landing, when it would have been in their best interest to do so?

Soviets would only expose their fake attempts in space as well.

That's not really a good answer. :unimpressed:

That would give them MORE incentive to call the moon landing fake. :unimpressed:

Sounds like you can't accept a simple answer.

It's not a simple answer. :unimpressed:

Explaining why Russia didn't dispute the moon landing is more complicated than just saying we actually landed on the moon. :unimpressed:

You presuppose that the Russians were faking space missions too, so you'll have to explain how you know that as well. :unimpressed:

As well as how space missions done by the Chinese are also fake. :unimpressed:

And why Australia, England, and Spain independently verified that they received NASA transmissions from space, solidifying that it actually occurred. :unimpressed:

Get to work :unimpressed:

Somehow all things in your life are complex there for should be complex answers to questions. Sorry you don't get to choose what is in the world.

Answer two simple questions...

Why destroy moon landing footage?

How is technology far greater in 1969 than today?

I could flip that around and say that "somehow all things in your life are simple, therefore there should be simple answers to questions." You seem to fear a world that you cannot easily understand.

You crave simplicity, and yet, paradoxically, you come up with increasingly complex explanations as to why things are the way they are just to weasel around the evidence.

If there's good evidence, accept it. If there isn't, move on.

I could flip that around and say that "somehow all things in your life are simple, therefore there should be simple answers to questions." You seem to fear a world that you cannot easily understand.

You crave simplicity, and yet, paradoxically, you come up with increasingly complex explanations as to why things are the way they are just to weasel around the evidence.

If there's good evidence, accept it. If there isn't, move on.

.


You are flipping sayings to reflect you not me. There are complex things but there also simple things. I'm not the one picking and choosing based off someone's response to your simple question.

I made it extremely easy for you with 2 simple questions and you can't even answer them..:mjlol:

You continue to ignore it.

I actually answered your question pretty thoroughly. You just don't like the answer. :bpunimpressed:

Explain why the Soviets agreed that it happened, despite having every incentive to call bullsh*t.
Explain how you know the Russian space program was fake.
Explain how you know the Chinese space program was fake.
Explain how Spain, Australia, and England independently verified the moon landing.
Explain how half a million+ people involved in the moon landing and related operations kept 100% silent with no leaks.
Explain why everyone who disputes the moon landing had no involvement with it whatsoever.
Explain how there is not one person involved in the moon landing who disputes that it happened.

Get. To. Work. :bpunimpressed:

Notice he couldn't answer 2 simple questions. Soviets question was answered and somehow he thinks country verification is relevant to this subject at all.
 
Top