Google. Hundreds of articles on it.Actua
Source?
Google. Hundreds of articles on it.Actua
Source?
Google. Hundreds of articles on it.
Are any of those hundreds of articles credible? I've heard that sometimes, there's fake sh*t on the internet. :bpohh:
Fake like the moon landing you mean?
thats why we're giving you a chance to prove that.....Fake like the moon landing you mean?
...Yeah, pretty much. :bpunimpressed:
What does this have to do with the Moon landing? :bpunimpressed:
You didn't address sh*t. You answered my initial question with a baseless assertion (Russians faked space travel too) without substantiation.
I then told you that it wasn't a good answer (it still isn't) and in the following post I explained why (you called it "simple", but it leaves too many unanswered questions, which I listed). It's more simple to say we actually landed on the Moon rather than assume Russia faked their space program. You haven't provided any evidence of this; you said it as if it's an accepted fact.
You then asked those two questions you keep bringing up, despite the fact that you have yet to provide any evidence that the Russian space program--and other nation's space programs, for that matter--were fake.
You breezed by that sh*t like you were being rational here. :reallyson:
You were talking out of your ass, and wanted to move on to these questions because you know you can't back that sh*t up. :reallyson:
Actua
Source?
You talk too much which shows you have narassitic tendancies.
You've never engaged with my arguments in an honest manner, not without hurling insults or making baseless, unwarranted assumptions about me or what my supposed agenda is.
Why should I waste my time entertaining anything you have to say? :bpunimpressed:
Until you answer the 2 questions
dont bother quoting me kid
say that again in english with punctuationYou believe the rover is on Mars off CGI Animation and cry sources that it's in Iceland.
Cui bono? :bpthink:
1. US govt wins another aspect of Cold War.
2. More support from US public, more funding.
Or does this make more sense to you?
Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits
How We Lost The Ability To Travel To The Moon
Our opponents in the Cold War were the Soviets.
Why have they never disputed the moon landing, when it would have been in their best interest to do so?
Soviets would only expose their fake attempts in space as well.
That's not really a good answer.
That would give them MORE incentive to call the moon landing fake.![]()
Sounds like you can't accept a simple answer.
It's not a simple answer.
Explaining why Russia didn't dispute the moon landing is more complicated than just saying we actually landed on the moon.
You presuppose that the Russians were faking space missions too, so you'll have to explain how you know that as well.
As well as how space missions done by the Chinese are also fake.
And why Australia, England, and Spain independently verified that they received NASA transmissions from space, solidifying that it actually occurred.
Get to work![]()
Somehow all things in your life are complex there for should be complex answers to questions. Sorry you don't get to choose what is in the world.
Answer two simple questions...
Why destroy moon landing footage?
How is technology far greater in 1969 than today?
I could flip that around and say that "somehow all things in your life are simple, therefore there should be simple answers to questions." You seem to fear a world that you cannot easily understand.
You crave simplicity, and yet, paradoxically, you come up with increasingly complex explanations as to why things are the way they are just to weasel around the evidence.
If there's good evidence, accept it. If there isn't, move on.
I could flip that around and say that "somehow all things in your life are simple, therefore there should be simple answers to questions." You seem to fear a world that you cannot easily understand.
You crave simplicity, and yet, paradoxically, you come up with increasingly complex explanations as to why things are the way they are just to weasel around the evidence.
If there's good evidence, accept it. If there isn't, move on.
.
You are flipping sayings to reflect you not me. There are complex things but there also simple things. I'm not the one picking and choosing based off someone's response to your simple question.
I made it extremely easy for you with 2 simple questions and you can't even answer them..
You continue to ignore it.
I actually answered your question pretty thoroughly. You just don't like the answer. :bpunimpressed:
Explain why the Soviets agreed that it happened, despite having every incentive to call bullsh*t.
Explain how you know the Russian space program was fake.
Explain how you know the Chinese space program was fake.
Explain how Spain, Australia, and England independently verified the moon landing.
Explain how half a million+ people involved in the moon landing and related operations kept 100% silent with no leaks.
Explain why everyone who disputes the moon landing had no involvement with it whatsoever.
Explain how there is not one person involved in the moon landing who disputes that it happened.
Get. To. Work. :bpunimpressed:
say that again in english with punctuation
thats why we're giving you a chance to prove that.....
an actual source works better than a smiley...
I could.Clever.
You gonna provide evidence that the Mars rover is in Iceland? Rather than the next Mars rover being tested in Iceland? Or nah?![]()
I could.
But it's Friday, and I'd rather go out and drink.See ya'll Monday!
I could.
But it's Friday, and I'd rather go out and drink.See ya'll Monday!