Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
14,110
Reputation
10,443
Daps
73,105
Reppin
Wakanda
you lost homie. Your whole argument went up in smoke.

Uh, no, it didn't. You haven't disproven sh*t. :mjlolhairfade:

EDIT: You haven't even addressed anything in the video in the OP, so I'm not the one refusing to address arguments. :bpufedup:

20 pages in and you avoided 2 questions I asked you.

...And? :bpunimpressed:

You've never engaged with my arguments in an honest manner, not without hurling insults or making baseless, unwarranted assumptions about me or what my supposed agenda is.

Why should I waste my time entertaining anything you have to say? :bpunimpressed:
 
Last edited:

Benefited

Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
10,786
Reputation
91
Daps
30,216
I can knock-out two of your issues with one fact: There are retroreflectors planted on the Moon by the Apollo and Soviet Lunokhod missions that are used to accurately measure the distance to the Moon from the Earth. These retroreflectors are targeted by lasers from several observatories all around the world. These reflectors have also been photographed numerous times from space by other Nations' space agencies. Presently, there are 5 of them there with plans for 2 more this year....

Lunar Laser Ranging experiment - Wikipedia


I'm going to reject this just because you don't really need a "retroreflecter" to bounce a laser off the moon. But I'm sure they could have put a laser up there by now with a rover or some unmanned craft for purposes of visual evidence. Doesn't really prove that was done back in the day when they say we landed on the moon. I'm certainly not going to completely fall for what could simply be the European covering his tracks. Plus that would be good "evidence" for people who don't know you don't need anything man made on the moon to bounce signals off of it:respect:
 

Booker T Garvey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
29,744
Reputation
3,952
Daps
124,178
:mjlol:
3cdwjj.jpg
 

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
19,742
Reputation
3,003
Daps
102,523
Next ya'll gon say "Well the tech is there to go to Mars, but different tech (the one from the 60s) is needed to get to the Moon. And there's nothing on the Moon worth going back to."

:stopitslime:
We don't have the tech for mars...
We have the ability to engineer it... But we don't have actual life support systems and craft ready for that mission..

You nikkas are dumb as hell for not understanding how technology and manufacturing works

Do you believe we sent that Rover to mars or is that being faked? That's the real question.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
Uh, no, it didn't. You haven't disproven sh*t. :mjlolhairfade:



...And? :bpunimpressed:

You've never engaged with my arguments in an honest manner, not without hurling insults or making baseless, unwarranted assumptions about me or what my supposed agenda is.

Why should I waste my time entertaining anything you have to say? :bpunimpressed:

1. I guess you that type that has to be right when you have been wrong the whole time. I knew few Kats like that in my lifetime.

2. I engaged your arguments with respect and since you dismissed my answers to your questions "b/c it wasn't good enough" then I changed my tune. No where in your thread did you ask for a respectable dialogue bc your thread was about mocking others.

So save the victim card for another day with these excuses.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,285
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Benefited said:
Doesn't really prove that was done back in the day when they say we landed on the moon

Actually, it does, since that experiment, which is still ongoing, wasn't possible until those reflectors were installed during the Apollo missions.

This is not an opinion, but an objective, historical, fact​


It was only in the late 1960's, with the birth of the NASA Apollo project for landing an astronaut safely on the moon, that the concept of laser ranging to a lunar surface corner retroreflector package became a reality. The first deployment of such a package on the lunar surface took place during the Apollo 11 mission in the summer of 1969 and lunar laser ranging (LLR) became a reality [Bender et al., 1973]. Additional retroreflector packages were landed on the lunar surface by NASA during the Apollo 14 and Apollo 15 missions. Two French-built retroreflector packages were soft-landed on the lunar surface by Soviet landers [Barker et al., 1975].

For historical completeness, it should be mentioned that the very first lunar laser ranging observations of the Apollo 11 retroreflector package were made with the 3.1-m telescope at Lick Observatory [Faller et al., 1969]. However, the ranging system at Lick was designed solely for quick acquisition and confirmation, rather than for an extended program. In those very early days, successful lunar laser range measurements were also reported by the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories Lunar Ranging Observatory in Arizona [AFCRL, 1969] the Pic du Midi Observatory in France [Calame et al., 1970] and the Tokyo Astronomical Observatory [Kozai, 1972]. Over the past almost 30 years, lunar laser ranging has also been accomplished by stations in Maui, the former Soviet Union, Australia, and Germany. A new lunar capable station is being built by researchers in Italy. However, the only stations to produce these observations in a routine and continuous way are the McDonald station in the United States and the CERGA station in France. A paper describing the early efforts of the CERGA station can be found elsewhere in this volume [Veillet et al., 1993].
 

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
14,110
Reputation
10,443
Daps
73,105
Reppin
Wakanda
I guess you that type that has to be right when you have been wrong the whole time.

This sounds like you, actually. :bpunimpressed:

I engaged your arguments with respect and since you dismissed my answers to your questions "b/c it wasn't good enough" then I changed my tune.

You have yet to address anything stated in the video in the OP. F*ck outta here. :cambybp:
 

OJ Simpsom

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Messages
14,703
Reputation
9,247
Daps
41,168
We don't have the tech for mars...
We have the ability to engineer it... But we don't have actual life support systems and craft ready for that mission..

You nikkas are dumb as hell for not understanding how technology and manufacturing works

Do you believe we sent that Rover to mars or is that being faked? That's the real question.
It's been proven that rover is driving around Iceland.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
This sounds like you, actually. :bpunimpressed:



You have yet to address anything stated in the video in the OP. F*ck outta here. :cambybp:

Sounds like me? And yet the person trying so desperately to make your viewpoint known goes into the The Bushes forum and makes arguments there mocking people cause they were taken away from a forum. Do we need examples.

I addressed you...dont need to address a video.
 

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
14,110
Reputation
10,443
Daps
73,105
Reppin
Wakanda
Sounds like me?

...Yeah, pretty much. :bpunimpressed:

And yet the person trying so desperately to make your viewpoint known goes into the The Bushes forum and makes arguments there mocking people cause they were taken away from a forum. Do we need examples.

What does this have to do with the Moon landing? :bpunimpressed:


I addressed you...dont need to address a video.

You didn't address sh*t. You answered my initial question with a baseless assertion (Russians faked space travel too) without substantiation.

I then told you that it wasn't a good answer (it still isn't) and in the following post I explained why (you called it "simple", but it leaves too many unanswered questions, which I listed). It's more simple to say we actually landed on the Moon rather than assume Russia faked their space program. You haven't provided any evidence of this; you said it as if it's an accepted fact.

You then asked those two questions you keep bringing up, despite the fact that you have yet to provide any evidence that the Russian space program--and other nation's space programs, for that matter--were fake.

You breezed by that sh*t like you were being rational here. :reallyson:

You were talking out of your ass, and wanted to move on to these questions because you know you can't back that sh*t up. :reallyson:
 
Top