You religious folks have absolutely NO idea how to form a coherent argument because you have NO evidence to support any of your claims.
You religious folks have absolutely NO idea how to form a coherent argument because you have NO evidence to support any of your claims.
So when you said there was studies that showed it was made up you were lying right?
No dumbass, like I said before, I'm not doing your homework for you. Like you said, it's not like I'm getting 1 million dollars to post 50 studies showing you how they examine these OBE claims. If you wanna act ignorant and say that it's not happening, then be my guest, but I'm not gonna spend more than 5 minutes researching something you could easily google yourself.
I already brought up the fact that they can't even objectively describe any "qualities" of God, I don't think they understand the significance of that limitation.Guys, I don't get this argument at all.
Why do we always force them to argue their claim for "God." They should be making arguments specific to the version of the creator that they believe in.
I think, if I'm not mistaken, I've seen both christians and muslims like the same post in this thread. Amazing really. Seriously, stop arguing with these dudes about the existence of a God. Right now, I'm just reading arguments for deism and pantheism, but I think TUH is the only deist on this site.
you cant be this stupid. I refuse to believe youre as dumb as youre playing right now. evidence of something's non-existence IS their non-existence. fukk kinda dumb shyt you on?
You atheists have absolutely NO idea how to form a coherent argument because you have NO evidence to support any of your claims.
Despite the fact that the atheists are the only one using evidence to back up claims and statements. All you have been doing is trying to antagonize people in this thread, you've contributed absolutely nothing, which isn't surprising considering religious folks have nothing to stand on to even argue about.This can fit nicely here
I already brought up the fact that they can't even objectively describe any "qualities" of God, I don't think they understand the significance of that limitation.
Despite the fact that the atheists are the only one using evidence to back up claims and statements. All you have been doing is trying to antagonize people in this thread, you've contributed absolutely nothing, which isn't surprising considering religious folks have nothing to stand on to even argue about.
I don't think I should try to argue anyway, it's absolutely pointless, but here I am anyway, trying to get through to at least one of these dumb fukks.I don't think you should argue the science with them
this guy legit asked for evidence of somethings non-existence... breh is lost. completely lost.I don't think I should try to argue anyway, it's absolutely pointless, but here I am anyway, trying to get through to at least one of these dumb fukks.
In some circumstances it can be safely assumed that if a certain event had occurred, evidence of it could be discovered by qualified investigators. In such circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to take the absence of proof of its occurrence as positive proof of its non-occurrence.Antagonizing? I've asked people to explain their arguments. Heres what happened:
1. No mayo states something about studies. I ask him to link to the study and he gets mad, whines, and storms out the thread
2. intelectual says that God doesnt exist, I ask for support for this claim (not even proof just support) and he has nothing.
Then you say Im antagonizing.