I thought that performances, in the finals, matters more than anything else? Lebron doesn't get bonus points for his 2011 finals despite all the amazing playing he did in the Eastern Conference or the fact that he won a ring with great numbers in 2012?
The issue here isn't whether Kobe played well in the finals. The issue is whether he was a sidekick. A sidekick doesn't average 29/7/6 in the playoffs after he averages 28/6/5 in the regular season. That is what Kobe did at 22 years old on the 2001 Lakers.
Kobe's production in 2001 and 2002 was not the type of production of a sidekick. He averaged 29ppg in the playoffs while Shaq averaged 30ppg. He averaged 28ppg in the regular season while Shaq averaged 29ppg.
If Kobe is averaging one less PPG than Shaq in both the playoffs and regular season, that doesn't make him the sidekick. It makes him EQUAL.
a nikka averaging 27-29 pts per game each season. nikka...imagine Jordan and Kobe in the Bulls backcourt
Scottie Pippen wouldn't have helped either considering Kobe blazed the Kings, Spurs and Blazers multiple times for 30+ ppg a series and that was way beyond Scottie's capabilities.

Kobe retired a Laker and got love from the basketball world as he went out, Shaq was somewhere in Boston or Phoenix, who knows 
