Why does Ryse get hate for the same things the Uncharted series gets praised for?
- Thread starter MeachTheMonster
- Start date
Ryse wasn't trash but it wasn't worth 60 bucks when it came out. I think it was a game to show the graphical sense of next gen that shyt looked good and it wasn't even 1080P.
The gameplay is great. You mean to tell me when you used that thermite rifle or that shotty you was like?
I actually loved the ideas in the game but time you settle in and think you're in for an epic firefight, they switch shyt up on you or it's over too quickly. Let's not talk about the lycans. Time you be like
werewolves, they be like 
watch this movie lil anxious ass nikka
That's not what I'm talking about. Is the gameplay where you are shooting shyt good or bad?? That's what I'm asking, not pacing which is what you're talking about.I actually loved the ideas in the game but time you settle in and think you're in for an epic firefight, they switch shyt up on you or it's over too quickly. Let's not talk about the lycans. Time you be like
You mean the thread right?
It's ok. Shooting mechanics are good but I hate how they funnel you into a hallway or corridor to do it.
it struggled to even hold up at 900p man framerate wise.
and that shyt looked impressive to say the least. I like what Dying Light developers stated that the ESRAM is hard to develop for but Microsoft is slowly creating tools to make it easier. Which is why Dying Light is 1080P on the One same as PS4.
This game is almost entirely combat. Assassin's Creed and Arkham have other activities outside the combat. I'm gonna keep trying to plow through this game to get to the good parts but I'm forcing myself to play this here.
No doubt, but some games aren't as taxing. The ones that are is where the graphical difference shows. That's pretty much established at this point. I'm just glad they decided not to go with the ESRAM solution on the PS4 as planned in the early stages.
But both Sony and MS fukked up on that weak ass CPU.
If they could have put the Cell in the PS4....
Dying light is one of the most taxing games on next gen so far.No doubt, but some games aren't as taxing. The ones that are is where the graphical difference shows. That's pretty much established at this point. I'm just glad they decided not to go with the ESRAM solution on the PS4 as planned in the early stages.
But both Sony and MS fukked up on that weak ass CPU.
If they could have put the Cell in the PS4....
Yeah. That's what I said.
The combat isn't bad, but being that, that's all there's is to the gameplay it gets old quick.
No doubt, but some games aren't as taxing. The ones that are is where the graphical difference shows. That's pretty much established at this point. I'm just glad they decided not to go with the ESRAM solution on the PS4 as planned in the early stages.
But both Sony and MS fukked up on that weak ass CPU.
If they could have put the Cell in the PS4....
Microsoft went that way because of the Kinect. To be honest not even going to front this gen won't last 5 years. Both are old CPUs Old GPUs and Memory. I just expect next consoles to be future proof easily.
Can't say that for the PS4's memory.
The GPU in the Quad is pretty good as well, but they failed big time on the processor.
Both consoles should have been 1080p/60 standard, but at least my preferred console is closer to that. IMO, there is no excuse for MULTIPLE 720p titles on the Xbox One. ZERO EXCUSES.
But I fear that we will head in the direction of "upgradeable" consoles which I don't want.
