anyone doubting the 20-30% European DNA in most AAs must have never visited Maryland, Virginia, or North Carolina. you have scores of families who are very lightskinned....with no white relatives for generations. think Chris Brown's mom....she's from the same part of VA as me.
Why do some black people claim obviously mixed people as black?
- Thread starter Prynce
- Start date
Sauanaffe Tustunnagee
Banned
lightskin in and of itself and doesn't equal any muchless high admixture and i'm positive most black people in all those state aint that different/lighter skin than AAs in the rest of the country
The Baltimore black lives matters protests in B-more reminded me of Haiti damn near 
Maryland
Virginia
North Carolina
yeah these 3 states full of lightskins really do put into perspective how mixed AAs are
Sauanaffe Tustunnagee
Banned
yeah i'm sure those images are far removed from the average AA in those states
here is a more accurate picture of the Mid Atlantic black lightskin majority
Free African Americans of NC and VA - Genealogy.com
These genealogies, comprising the colonial history of the majority of the free African American families of Virginia and North Carolina, reveal a facet of American colonial history previously overlooked by historians:
Most of the free African Americans of Virginia and North Carolina originated in Virginia where they became free in the seventeenth and eighteenth century before chattel slavery and racism fully developed in the United States.
When they arrived in Virginia, Africans joined a society which was divided between master and white servant -- a society with such contempt for white servants that masters were not punished for beating them to death [McIlwaine, Minutes of the Council, 22-24]. They joined the same households with white servants ó working, eating, sleeping, getting drunk, and running away together [Northampton Orders 1664-74, fol.25, p.31 - fol.31; McIlwaine, Minutes of the Council, 466-7; Hening, Statutes at Large, II:117].
Some of these first African slaves became free:
Despite the efforts of the legislature, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.
From these genealogies, it appears that they were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. At least sixty-five of the families in this history appear to be descendants of white women. Many of these white servant women may have been the common-law wives of slaves since they had several mixed race children. (Note 3) Thirty-six families appear to be descended from freed slaves. (Note 4) It is likely that the majority of the remaining families were also descendants of white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.
These genealogies, comprising the colonial history of the majority of the free African American families of Virginia and North Carolina, reveal a facet of American colonial history previously overlooked by historians:
- Most families were the descendants of white servant women who had children by slaves or free African Americans.
- Families like Gowen , Cumbo , and Driggers who were free in the mid-seventeenth century had several hundred members before the end of the colonial period. They were descended from slaves who were freed before the 1723 Virginia Law which required legislative approval for manumissions.
- Very few families descended from white slave owners who had children by their slaves, perhaps as low as 1% of the total.
- Many free African American families in colonial North Carolina and Virginia were landowners.
- The light-skinned descendants of these families formed the tri-racial isolate communities of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, and Louisiana.
Most of the free African Americans of Virginia and North Carolina originated in Virginia where they became free in the seventeenth and eighteenth century before chattel slavery and racism fully developed in the United States.
When they arrived in Virginia, Africans joined a society which was divided between master and white servant -- a society with such contempt for white servants that masters were not punished for beating them to death [McIlwaine, Minutes of the Council, 22-24]. They joined the same households with white servants ó working, eating, sleeping, getting drunk, and running away together [Northampton Orders 1664-74, fol.25, p.31 - fol.31; McIlwaine, Minutes of the Council, 466-7; Hening, Statutes at Large, II:117].
Some of these first African slaves became free:
- John Geaween ( Gowen ) "a negro servant" was free in March 1641 according to the Virginia Council and General Court Records [VMHandB XI:281].
- Francis Payne of Northampton County paid for his freedom about 1650 by purchasing three white servants for his master's use [DW 1645-51, 14].
- Emanuell Cambow (Cumbo), Negro, was granted 50 acres in James City County on 18 April 1667 [Patent Book 6:39].
- John Harris "negro" was free in 1668 when he purchased 50 acres in York County [Deeds 1664-72, 327].
Despite the efforts of the legislature, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.
From these genealogies, it appears that they were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. At least sixty-five of the families in this history appear to be descendants of white women. Many of these white servant women may have been the common-law wives of slaves since they had several mixed race children. (Note 3) Thirty-six families appear to be descended from freed slaves. (Note 4) It is likely that the majority of the remaining families were also descendants of white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.
IllmaticDelta
Veteran
25% white (75% african)
23% white (77% african)
40% white (58% african)
23% white (77% african)
40% white (58% african)
breh that's exactly my point....if cacs will make up admixture for native black Africans they aint above doing the same to AAs
Theres two types of cac in this world..
1) Those that believe ancient Egypt was cac and all Black creations are really white in origin etc.
2) Those that aren't supremacists and have no agenda against Blacks.
As much as we like to believe they are all the same, they vary in their degrees of supremacy. What reason do they have to make up admixture in a people they generally detest and want nothing to do with.
Sauanaffe Tustunnagee
Banned
Free African Americans of NC and VA - Genealogy.com
These genealogies, comprising the colonial history of the majority of the free African American families of Virginia and North Carolina, reveal a facet of American colonial history previously overlooked by historians:
Virginia
- Most families were the descendants of white servant women who had children by slaves or free African Americans.
- Families like Gowen , Cumbo , and Driggers who were free in the mid-seventeenth century had several hundred members before the end of the colonial period. They were descended from slaves who were freed before the 1723 Virginia Law which required legislative approval for manumissions.
- Very few families descended from white slave owners who had children by their slaves, perhaps as low as 1% of the total.
- Many free African American families in colonial North Carolina and Virginia were landowners.
- The light-skinned descendants of these families formed the tri-racial isolate communities of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, and Louisiana.
Most of the free African Americans of Virginia and North Carolina originated in Virginia where they became free in the seventeenth and eighteenth century before chattel slavery and racism fully developed in the United States.
When they arrived in Virginia, Africans joined a society which was divided between master and white servant -- a society with such contempt for white servants that masters were not punished for beating them to death [McIlwaine, Minutes of the Council, 22-24]. They joined the same households with white servants ó working, eating, sleeping, getting drunk, and running away together [Northampton Orders 1664-74, fol.25, p.31 - fol.31; McIlwaine, Minutes of the Council, 466-7; Hening, Statutes at Large, II:117].
Some of these first African slaves became free:
Many were free on the Eastern Shore. There were at least 40 taxable African Americans in Northampton County in the 1670s who were free or later became free, representing one third of the taxable African Americans in the county.
- John Geaween ( Gowen ) "a negro servant" was free in March 1641 according to the Virginia Council and General Court Records [VMHandB XI:281].
- Francis Payne of Northampton County paid for his freedom about 1650 by purchasing three white servants for his master's use [DW 1645-51, 14].
- Emanuell Cambow (Cumbo), Negro, was granted 50 acres in James City County on 18 April 1667 [Patent Book 6:39].
- John Harris "negro" was free in 1668 when he purchased 50 acres in York County [Deeds 1664-72, 327].
Despite the efforts of the legislature, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.
dumb nikkas really taking those anestry.com fables on AAs seriously...mays supremacist are clearly trolling and buttering up their negro clients with romanticized tales of white admixture which even legit(most aren't) no doubt came from a redneck overseer or pot belly slave holding pig giving one of their foremothers that Kizzy salve rape work
i bet you sheep really believe Russ Wilson is the descendant of the Scottish Royal family too
Last edited:
Sauanaffe Tustunnagee
Banned
do you know one of these actors and promoting there work or something
nah you dumbass gotta an ancestry.com come intern or Heny Toby Gates
Last edited:
Sauanaffe Tustunnagee
Banned
1)all cacs are racist some are better hiding it than others
2)cacs in the genealogy/anthropology field have been the gate keepers of white supremacy in science...again google Hamatic theory
3) don't act like you haven't witnessed racist snow ape strolling on on forums such as topix AA forum/ implying their Neanderthal blood raised AAs collective intelligence and softened our features
Last edited:
dumb nikkas really taking those anestry.com fables on AAs seriously...cacs are clearly trolling and buttering up their clients with these romanticized tells of white admixture which even legit came from a redneck overseer or pot belly slave holding pig giving open of their fore mothers that Kizzy rape worki bet you sheep really believe Russ Wilson is the descendant of the Scottish Royal family too
I know my own history breh. My family is one of those lightskinned groups they referenced above that inherited land from slavery...there's 50 some acres that's been in family since 1780.
Sauanaffe Tustunnagee
Banned
even if true your mutt family is the exception not the rule.
i'm positive the vast majority of AAs in Va and Nc aren't descendants of mutantlatoo bedwenches/bucks whom inherited their white daddy land and wealth