Why do some black people claim obviously mixed people as black?

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
So you still doubt the valid of the tests..why?

he's a lunatic


i read enough and well aware of the biracial/mixed race minoritiy the AA population which in and of itself doesn't support your ill founded stance...at t the end of the day being admxied comes down to all AAs having biracial and ultimately white forefathers which you have still yet to prove:stopitslime:

I've more than enough proved it:myman:
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
3,883
Reputation
-2,870
Daps
4,926
I had this discussion with you before in another thread. This test is old as dirt my ninja:mjlol:

Volume 63, Issue 6, p1839–1851, December 1998

© 1998 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc.

1) and you have yet to explain how/why AAs should take genetic studies on us seriously from when the print outrageous lies such as the "Tut." mystery Western Euopean genes as scientific fact:stopitslime:

-i'm not ya nikka...knuckle dragging cave fakkit:pacspit:

-December 98 isn't a lifetime ago and the study was released 5 years ago

Life| Mon Aug 1, 2011 6:58pm BST




yet again you caught in a web of lies and deception...i'm noticing a pattern with you..pinky:jbhmm:
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
The hell you mean..

Muhammed Ali's grandson
33a0f57b-5d21-e311-99e4-002655e6c126_original.jpg



So he'd be allowed at a Pan African meeting huh:comeon:

He's of African descent and if he identified as "black" yeah. West Indians in New York had no problem with seeing this Afram as "black"

Gjb4vD1.jpg



 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
42,376
Reputation
3,252
Daps
124,102
he's a lunatic

He's suggesting there is a deep conspiracy behind these tests to somehow denote Black people as part white..in a country that hates Blacks and wants no link or association to us at any level, let alone at a genetic level.
So a person (Black) theyve never seen sends in a sample, and it turns out as largely SSA with a bit of European.
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
42,376
Reputation
3,252
Daps
124,102
He's of African descent and if he identified as "black" yeah. West Indians in New York had no problem with seeing this Afram as "black"

Gjb4vD1.jpg





The psychosis brought about from living in a predominantly white culture where you'll accept anything a white person says.
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
He's suggesting there is a deep conspiracy behind these tests to somehow denote Black people as part white..in a country that hates Blacks and wants no link or association to us at any level, let alone at a genetic level.

he also thinks there is a conspiracy behind the genealogical records where they clearly show the mulattos and whites in the typical afram family history. For some reason he thinks Aframs are 100% unchanged genetically-phenotypically from their African ancestors.
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
The psychosis brought about from living in a predominantly white culture where you'll accept anything a white person says.

I already told you afram identity was forming before the 1 Drop Rule was a rule so people like him are a product of that legacy. Again, "Black" in the USA simply means of african descent
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
42,376
Reputation
3,252
Daps
124,102
I already told you afram identity was forming before the 1 Drop Rule was a rule so people like him are a product of that legacy. Again, "Black" in the USA simply means of african descent

'Simply' is correct. Because it means theyre merely consigned to people of Africa and just call it a day. No other effort is put into correct racial placement.
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
'Simply' is correct. Because it means theyre merely consigned to people of Africa and just call it a day. No other effort is put into correct racial placement.

their correct placement is within a hybridized or "Afro European" context racially speaking and "black" socically but since these 2 are tied together, they are as equally "black" as Idi Amin.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
3,883
Reputation
-2,870
Daps
4,926
GTFOH...............that chart was self explanatory

YKco6oS.jpg


and this was in plain english

1DUvgM4.jpg




:comeon::childplease::camby:

you implied they were all mulatto sambos though Opey:comeon:

we taking `19th century European colonist skewed views on the black race as fact now when most have been exposed as white supremacist whom have a habit of making up Caucasian admixtures for blacks whom don't fit in their box such as the Tutsi of Rwanda and Khoisan South Africans:childplease:


. The Belgians chose the Tutsi since they comefrom Caucasian ancestry and have the physical appearance of a European. The Tutsi look almostexactly like the Hutu except the Tutsi have longer narrower noses and are slightly taller

The Belgians chose the Tutsi since they come from - SOCIOLOGY - 201


There are no official figures for how many South Africans are of Khoisan origin.

Under apartheid, they were classified as "coloured" or mixed race, and their indigenous languages and traditions were lost as they were forced to assimilate.

The first South Africans fight for their rights - BBC News
 
Top