Why do some black people claim obviously mixed people as black?

Thabo

Pro
Joined
Sep 29, 2015
Messages
572
Reputation
-295
Daps
676
  • According to Ancestry.com, the average African-American is 65 % sub-Saharan African, 29 % European and 2 % Native American.
  • According to 23andme.com, the average African-American is 75 % sub-Saharan African, 22 % European and only 0.6 % Native American.
  • According to Family Tree DNA.com, the average African-American is 72.95 % sub-Saharan African, 22.83 % European and 1.7 % Native American.
  • According to National Geographic’s Genographic Project, the average African-American is 80 % sub-Saharan African, 19 % European and 1 % Native American.
  • According to AfricanDNA, the average African-American is 79 % sub-Saharan African, 19 % European and 2 % Native American.
Sub-Saharan African DNA | Color Me American
Biracials skew the data. Take them out of the equation and the percentage drops significantly.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
3,883
Reputation
-2,870
Daps
4,926
  • According to Ancestry.com, the average African-American is 65 % sub-Saharan African, 29 % European and 2 % Native American.
  • According to 23andme.com, the average African-American is 75 % sub-Saharan African, 22 % European and only 0.6 % Native American.
  • According to Family Tree DNA.com, the average African-American is 72.95 % sub-Saharan African, 22.83 % European and 1.7 % Native American.
  • According to National Geographic’s Genographic Project, the average African-American is 80 % sub-Saharan African, 19 % European and 1 % Native American.
  • According to AfricanDNA, the average African-American is 79 % sub-Saharan African, 19 % European and 2 % Native American.
Sub-Saharan African DNA | Color Me American
yet the average Afro American has no white relatives or identifiable ancestors:comeon:we must have the same phantom European genes as King Tut....:aicmon:

Half of European men share King Tut's DNA


Half of European men share King Tut's DNA
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
3,883
Reputation
-2,870
Daps
4,926
Biracials skew the data. Take them out of the equation and the percentage drops significantly.

1))these scams are skewed from the start and have predetermined results

2l)ess than 1 percent of AAs have undergone them which even if accurate(they aren't) the sample size is hardly enough to determine anything and should be taken with a grain of salt
 
Last edited:

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
I highly doubt it these people are 25% white. Coolie means Indian or Indian-leaning in the Carribean. The left one is a Coolie and he's not 25% white. He's mostly Indian with some black. The girl in the middle is mostly black with some Indian. The boy to the right is not 25% white or any substantial part Indian. He's black. People with 25% white look like Beyonce, both in Jamaica and everywhere else, not dark-skinned negroes.

Also, in Jamaica, anyone that doesn't look full black is called white* or a name derogating a mixed and non-black designation (I forgot the actual term they use in Jamaica but there is one). In Trinidad we call many light skin people "white" and we have specific names for certain types of mixes (i.e. dougla). Jamaicans are as black or blacker than we Trinidadians and their labelling is similar.

this is exactly what i thought...this creepy cac so blinded and delusion he's claiming one of the little Hindu nikkas from Slum Dog Millionaire and all Jamaicans mulattos:russ:

wtf are yall talking about? The picture I posted made it clear I was refering to the boy on the far right as the 25% euro 75% negro hybrid aka the Sambo. I made no reference to the boy of the left (Indian) and the kid in the middle (sambo + Indian).
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
All of Ancestry.com, 23andme, FamilyTreeDNA, and probably Geographic get their samples from people who submitted their DNA a few years ago when DNA was expensive and just coming into the mainstream. Back then only pendants and richer people were interested enough and could afford to do it. At base your data is biased and unreliable. My study, meanwhile, is actual peer-reviewed scientific literature accepted into the American Journal of Human Genetics. My study uses real anthropological samples taken from people on the ground, giving far more accurate results than yours (which isn't a scientific study which controls for variables but rather more like a pendant's survey):

Estimating African American Admixture Proportions by Use of Population-Specific Alleles
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707616280


I had this discussion with you before in another thread. This test is old as dirt my ninja:mjlol:

Volume 63, Issue 6, p1839–1851, December 1998

© 1998 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc.
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
Michelle is a mammy and married to a half cac white house nikka but i'm skeptical on this:patrice:if woods did a documentary claiming Harriet Tubman was a mulatto your dumbas would eat it up without questiona and refrence her as an example of AAs historical mixed identity:russ:


ofcourse they are...most AAs aren't defined as admixed:comeon:
how is posting propaganda of alleged(unproven) admixture of single celebrity figures validate the claim all AAs are admixed:stopitslime:...

Keep acting like you're stuck on stupid and living in denial of the historic and genetic reality of aframs:lolbron::sas2:
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
Biracials skew the data. Take them out of the equation and the percentage drops significantly.

biracials aren't skewing the data because 1st generation biracials aren't that numerous in the pool of monoracial, multi gen aframs
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
25,579
Reputation
2,415
Daps
73,300

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
25,579
Reputation
2,415
Daps
73,300

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,877
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,276
Multi-generationals are biracials too

aframs on the whole are multigenerational. You'll be hard pressed to find 100% african, Aframs



angela-bassett-afro.jpg



Her DNA shows 77% SubSaharan (32% Nigerian, 15% Benin/Togo & more) 21% European & Native American.

tumblr_mb1ommylz01r01s07o1_500.jpg


t test shows 82% Sub-Saharan, 13% European and others

Nas Bassett Jarrett


or

70% african



76% african



65% african



93% african



.
.
some others for contextual purposes

iMl3heN.jpg


Click here to view the original image of 640x640px.
Pyic9wd.jpg




Click here to view the original image of 640x640px.
tX2hKdx.jpg


Click here to view the original image of 640x640px.
KlOVdey.jpg


.
.
.


Click here to view the original image of 612x612px.
ya9J0Rt.jpg


Click here to view the original image of 640x640px.
1DP6gWx.jpg


Click here to view the original image of 640x640px.
YhUM7Xh.jpg


Click here to view the original image of 640x640px.
QRdC5Nb.jpg


.
.
.

Mu7mSo7.jpg


3NOVnnd.jpg
.
.
.
.
.

LYMFJUb.jpg


Click here to view the original image of 640x640px.
sVnb4o0.jpg


.
.


y6jaNFI.jpg


Click here to view the original image of 640x640px.
VVQE9Mb.jpg


.
.

s2PEJi2.jpg


Click here to view the original image of 640x640px.
iGQvKo9.jpg
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
42,372
Reputation
3,252
Daps
124,092
Accepting mixed race folks who are clearly half white will hinder Black unity among all African descendants..is it worth it?
 
Top