Just because feminists make a few valid points here and there doesn't mean I agree with the overall movement. Did I not just explain how black feminists can't bring themselves to admit that male heterosexuality among certain races is oppressed/deemed threatening? How would that NOT be one of many deal breakers?
Acknowledging the disproportionate rate of black male on black female violence =/= denying that black men are victims of rape and domestic violence. In fact I explicitly said black male rape is under reported. Expressions of misogyny or violence towards women in the black community does not mean men don't for example, get raped. It's a false dichotomy when suggesting that the presence of those problems among men eliminates the presence of the aforementioned problems faced by women.
I wasn't making a statement that said all black men do anything simply because some do. So.... why would I give you prerequisite data to support a statement I never made?
I don't have problems with people using statistics to invalidate feminism. I have problems when black men narrowly focus on crime statistics to exclude black women from receiving advocacy from activists, or barring them from leadership positions because they're "more privileged". Firstly it's a false dichotomy: that leadership and advocacy groups cannot be shared by the sexes.
Secondly, we'd realize that the White community has an even BIGGER disproportion of violence than the black community if we'd stop making the only method of quantifying violence through arrest and crime data. Whites have the power to decide what's legal. So since violence and aggression against Blacks is legalized, it won't BE accounted for in arrest data or crime statistics. So of course it's going to "look" like black men--- black people in general are much more "violent" than their Whites counterparts.
But what if we accounted for the thousands of victims affected by Flint as violence statistics? Harming the citizens of flint was LEGAL, so it will never be integrated into the crime/arrest stats whites use to denigrate blacks. But, if we expand how we understand violence, we'll grasp that the white community has disproportionately more violence than any disproportions that exist within the black community. Which makes it unfounded and racist to stigmatize black men for "violence" compared to White men.
Unfortunately, what SOME black men have a problem with, is that a more expansive interpretation of violence means to admit black women--- feminist or not, aren't all that privileged and undeserving of resources. Meaning black women would have every right to run movements about state sanctioned violence, because they're about as likely as men to receive it.
Lastly, suggesting that heterosexual black men should just.... "take over" BLM infantilizes and emasculates the heterosexual black men. Primarily because they never built BLM. Rather than expecting the heterosexual black male to be independent and build his own movement, this would just encourage him to be dependent/complacent with being "mommied" and "daddied" by other people who give him things he didn't build.
This is ridiculous...
Black and Latino feminists threw a fit and made a petition when Obama made that bullshyt My Brother's Keeper initiative while women and girls had the Council of Women and Girls in the White House since his coming into office.
The White House Council on Women and Girls
On March 11, 2009, President Obama signed an
Executive Order creating the White House Council on Women and Girls. In his remarks at the signing, the President underscored that the purpose of the Council is to ensure that each of the agencies in which they're charged takes into account the needs of women and girls in the policies they draft, the programs they create, the legislation they support and that the true purpose of our government is to ensure that in America, all things are still possible for all people.
1,000 women of color want women and girls included in ‘My Brother’s Keeper’
More than 1,000 women of color have signed a letter calling for gender equality in President Obama’s “My Brother’s Keeper” program, putting the White House on the defensive about its initiative aimed at improving the lives of at-risk boys and young men.
The problem is, any effort by any men to assert a male identity is seen as sexism and misogyny...
And the worst part in Black men's case...majority Black civil rights action or movement or anger is based off of our deaths at the hands of White people because we are the most targeted...
For Black feminists and LGBT to take that and then make a movement out of it and exclude heterosexual Black males from being the center of it...when we are the poster child of BLM is exploitation.
If Black feminists and LGBT wanna make a feminist and LGBT movement...that's cool...but leave heterosexual Black males out of it...don't use our deaths...don't use our injustice to further your gain...
You can theorize about gender and sexuality all you want...but leave Black men out of it...
Don't talk out both sides of your mouth...
Don't come in our face..."But we care about you Black man...we march when you die out in them streets" and then go tell liberal White folks and the World through your books and academic journals about how violent and manchild like Black males are...and then act brand new about why legislation is made to trap Black men in the system. Why cops and vigilantes have no problem killing Black males with impunity.
This thread is about Black feminists limiting the avenues of Black men to get help and organize due to their silly gender theory and their exploitation of Black male death.
The sad shyt is...Black females are more violent than their females of other races...if anything...Black males should be abstracting and theorizing Black females and their violence towards Black men. The level of Black male victims of Black female violence is abnormal. Yet, we don't talk about that.
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/mf.pdf
Among black marital partners, wives were just about as likely to kill their husbands as husbands were to kill their wives: 47% of the victims of a spouse were husbands and 53% were wives. Among white victims murdered by their spouse, wives were much less likely to be the killers: 38% of the victims were husbands and 62% were wives.
- “The rates of psychological, sexual, and physical dating violence perpetrated against Black men are unacceptably high. In fact, Rouse (1988) noted that when compared to White and Latino male undergraduates, “among dating students in this sample, the highest percentages for partner’s use of physical force and consequences experienced as a result were for Black men” (p. 318). Although researchers did not survey both members of the couple, an examination of gender differences revealed that Black women reported using more violence against boyfriends than Black men reported using against their girlfriends (Clark et al., 1994; DeMaris, 1990).”
We talk about toxic masculinity and Black hypermasculinity and all that BS.
And how you gonna categorize unjust violence without arrest and crime data?
Violence shouldn't be broaden...if someone beats you, rapes, kills you...that's violence...if it goes reported and goes to trial...it is counted...if the event is included in a police report...it is counted.
All this other stuff is just made up stuff to make it sound more complicated than it really is...