Why Black Americans Should Continue To Bear Arms

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,711
Reputation
555
Daps
22,613
Reppin
Arrakis
Why Black Americans Should Continue To Bear Arms | RapRehab

The legal/legislative issue of gun control continues to be a hotly debated topic for black Americans and will always be an important issue for all of America.

The subject matter is constantly in the media, with each report lending its own social and political spin. Most opinions produced or written in the African-American press argue for increased gun control.

The common jurisdictional component in all cases is the state of Florida. Those cases include the State of Florida v. George Zimmerman, also known as the Trayvon Martin case, State of Florida v. Marissa Alexander, with the most recent one being the State of Florida v. Michael David Dunn, in which the victim is Jordan Russell Davis.

Also at issue is Florida Statute 776.013 commonly referred to as the “Stand Your Ground” law. The statute is a defense strategy and option afforded to defendants in certain criminal proceedings when the accused defendants are charged criminally when using firearms that they otherwise allegedly are legally permitted to carry and possess.

Let me state at the outset that the families of the deceased victims in these cases, Trayvon Martin andJordan Russell Davis, have my condolences. Reading news reports of how these young black, American males lost their life makes me angry. I am a black American, a male, and a resident of the State of Florida, living in Orlando.

I supported Barack Obama’s run for president in 2008 and 2012 and was part of the Obama legal team for poll watching on Election Day in 2008 and for early voting in 2012, trying to insure no voting irregularities occurred on my watch.

And, while performing my sworn duties as a poll watcher, I had legally and properly concealed a Ruger SP 101 .357 Magnum with 5 rounds of hollow points in my Honda Element along with a Beretta Cheetah .380 semi-automatic with 13 rounds of hollow points for protection, just in case I needed to defend myself from any criminal tyranny, bigoted or otherwise.

I make no apologies for my zeal and advocacy for a strong 2nd Amendment. I’m equally as zealous concerning 9th Amendment privacy issues, freedoms for women giving them the right to control their bodies, contraception, and which affords same-sex couples privacy rights along with the equal protections contained in the 14th Amendment.

I know I can be presumed a threat or suspicious person because of my skin color and gender. After all, I am a black-American male, well educated earning my B.S. at Illinois State University, an M.S.W. from the University of Pennsylvania and also attended Rutgers Law School-Camden. I understand the history of bigotry in America, but refuse to let it hold me back in any way, and I run own my own businesses.

Yet, I am still considered a target. In fact, no matter how old you become, being a black American male, walking outside in the environment, is always rife with inherent risks.

However, it is because of the aforementioned that I am also a strong 2nd Amendment advocate. I am the type of man who, because of the history of bigotry in America, and its racist roots of gun control, refuse to ever abdicate any right to the state, for any reason whatsoever, including my right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

I have in the past and shall continue to argue for no changes, no abolition or erosion of Florida Statute 776.013, or “Stand Your Ground”. Again, I am a black American. I am male.

Unfortunately the issue of the express constitutional right of the 2nd Amendment is confused by the lack of knowledge and history and the ability, rather the inability, fear and ignorance of some black Americans to realize that right to keep, bear and effectuate that right via the statutes of several states.

Because of its historically racist basis, the right to bear arms has been either historically usurped by bigoted state-sanctioned controls or has been intellectually, morally and emotionally usurped by the so-called teachings and suspect leadership of purported self-appointed leaders. This is true, whether the leaders be self-appointed or allegedly anointed, because of their so-called religious positions or piety, or have been compromised politically, though elected by the people.

Consequently, why would I or anyone, give back a right that black Americans have died for access to or have been lynched as a result of the inability to embrace and effectuate that right?

Do you think that any of the lynched martyrs of the black American experience would be deceased if they had brandished a Beretta M9, semi-automatic, hand gun with two magazines filled with 15 rounds of 9 millimeter, hollow point ammunition to defend themselves from lynch mob bigots?

I have often asked African-Americans what other express constitutional right they would like to see either abolished or repealed? I would have been taken aback had anyone answered the erosion or abolition of the 13th Amendment, which outlaws slavery and involuntary servitude.

In conclusion, the following passage taken from a law review article written by my criminal law professor Robert J. Cottrol formerly of Rutgers Law School-Camden further states my position.

The history of blacks, firearms regulations, and the right to bear arms should cause us to ask new questions regarding the Second Amendment. These questions will pose problems both for advocates of stricter gun controls and for those who argue against them. Much of the contemporary crime that concerns Americans is in poor black neighborhoods and a case can be made that greater firearms restrictions might alleviate this tragedy. But another, perhaps stronger case can be made that a society with a dismal record of protecting a people has a dubious claim on the right to disarm them. Perhaps a re-examination of this history can lead us to a modern realization of what the framers of the Second Amendment understood: that it is unwise to place the means of protection totally in the hands of the state, and that self-defense is also a civil right. [Georgetown Law Journal, Robert J. Cottrol & Raymond T. Diamond. Originally published as 80 GEO. L.J. 1991, 309-361 (1991).]
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,345
Reputation
3,838
Daps
107,170
Reppin
Detroit
I'm not really anti-2nd Amendment (though I personally dislike guns) but this argument is stupid.

Most black people live in black neighborhoods and around other black people, and you're more likely to get into a confrontation with people you live around. Many of these neighborhoods already have high rates of poverty and crime. Realistically, pushing for some huge increase in the percentage of black people who own guns will probably just result in more other black people being shot. And this isn't anything specific to black people, in general more guns=more homicide.

A few Zimmermans might be scared away, but I doubt it would be worth the increase in gun violence.

And if you really think the NRA is trying to look out for black people... :usure:
 

newarkhiphop

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
38,009
Reputation
10,167
Daps
124,919
why more blacks and Hispanics don't get some legit guns is beyond me , i live around some white folks now and all these fools got half half a doez to two dozens guns min, i asked a dude with 60 guns the other day why so many he said , just because i can :smugbiden:


:ohlawd: guns laws are non exsitent here compared to jersey am finna go ham, copping my first shotgun in october


:ufdup: buy guns brehs , the revolution will not be televised.
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,711
Reputation
555
Daps
22,613
Reppin
Arrakis
I'm not really anti-2nd Amendment (though I personally dislike guns) but this argument is stupid.

Most black people live in black neighborhoods and around other black people, and you're more likely to get into a confrontation with people you live around. Many of these neighborhoods already have high rates of poverty and crime. Realistically, pushing for some huge increase in the percentage of black people who own guns will probably just result in more other black people being shot. And this isn't anything specific to black people, in general more guns=more homicide.

A few Zimmermans might be scared away, but I doubt it would be worth the increase in gun violence.

And if you really think the NRA is trying to look out for black people... :usure:

Illegal guns and legal guns are different, the hood is flooded with illegal guns, what we need is good citizens that are well trained, that is a big difference
 

Momentum

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
25,830
Reputation
856
Daps
60,085
Reppin
NULL
Combat violence with violence, brehs.

Nothing will change. Guns cant protect you in the end.
 

LionofJudah

Banned
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
6,372
Reputation
835
Daps
11,600
Reppin
NULL
I'm not gonna say there's anything wrong with having a gun or two, but for the most part, our battle isn't against the flesh. Esau is the type to live and die by his guns, because he's a p*ssy.

Gen. 27:40
And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.
 

Chris.B

Banned
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
18,922
Reputation
-4,609
Daps
21,893
You know what will solve violence?

More guns.

You think Zimmerman would have followed Martin if he saw that he was strapped?:childplease:


He followed him because he felt empowered by his gun....Every black person should get a gun.

White folks are stocking up, they don't give a fukk about you.
 

Morph

Rookie
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
338
Reputation
0
Daps
279
Reppin
NULL
Many of these neighborhoods already have high rates of poverty and crime. Realistically, pushing for some huge increase in the percentage of black people who own guns will probably just result in more other black people being shot...And if you really think the NRA is trying to look out for black people... :usure:
I feel that if gangs were confronted by a unified front of responsible black gun owners, the community would win in a heart beat. Thugs terrorize neighborhoods because they know most black homes are unarmed, and worse, liberals have convinced the black community that institutions are supposed to "look out for us" and therefore we shouldn't organize and police ourselves, that we shouldn't own guns because the police have guns and they will be there for us when we need them.

But do you think the "gun nuts" that funded Zimmerman's defense are sitting around and waiting for the government or any institution to look out for them? Those people are unified, they look out for one another. I wouldn't be surprised to see GZ work as some Fox analyst or some NRA spokesperson or something like that. They got his back for life because of the precedent his trial has set.




why more blacks and Hispanics don't get some legit guns is beyond me , i live around some white folks now and all these fools got half half a doez to two dozens guns min, i asked a dude with 60 guns the other day why so many he said , just because i can....buy guns brehs , the revolution will not be televised.
My experience is similar to this. Most of the whites and latinos on my street are heavily armed. My street is quiet 24/7. You won't see people standing on corners, writing graffiti, playing loud music, or none of that. This street has a reputation for gun ownership, all the neighbors look out for each other. Take it for what it's worth.




You know what will solve violence?

More guns.
Some of the safest parts of Mexico are the ones where civilians have raised up arms and stood up to the crooked cops and cartels that fund them.
michoacan1.jpg

como5-440x293.jpg





Where was all the 2nd amendment right wing nutjobs at when Marissa Alexander was on trial? :aicmon:
I blame Angela Corey for that mess.
 

Momentum

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
25,830
Reputation
856
Daps
60,085
Reppin
NULL
You think Zimmerman would have followed Martin if he saw that he was strapped?:childplease:


He followed him because he felt empowered by his gun....Every black person should get a gun.

White folks are stocking up, they don't give a fukk about you.

Trayvon had a hoody on, so there is no way he knew if Trayvon was strapped or not, respectfully.
 

HollowPoints2

Don Makaveli.
Joined
Jun 18, 2013
Messages
4,680
Reputation
-4,115
Daps
5,596
Reppin
East Coast
That's the only thing that can keep you safe.
New York and California have the strictest gun laws imaginable. its funny how all the states with tough gun laws have the high homicide rates( Chicago,DC New York, Los Angeles)while states that allow the public to carry concealed weapons have the lowest crime rates. Why hasn't the strict gun laws reduced murders in Chicago DC New York Los Angeles??

The politicians in those states are just dumb and stupid they rather you be a victim before you can defend yourself with a gun so they make up these tough gun laws thinking it's going to reduce murders.
 
Top