Why aren’t people more outraged about automation taking over jobs in the future

Yade

BigJohnsons lol
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
5,513
Reputation
-1,215
Daps
13,892
People still don't take automation seriously or see it as a threat. That is the problem from conversations I've had in real life.
It’s jot a threat because there fav celeb hasn’t called it out :mjlol:


To busy boycotting states over abortion laws:hhh:
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
17,136
Reputation
-840
Daps
55,167
Reppin
NULL
if you think about , once automation takes over
I see the world embracing the social score system
Like China has


(Basically if you’re score is low you’re considered a low level citizen ) just imagine once they basically force you to accept trans , pedo , agendas , this is scary brehs


This shyt needs to be talked about more , I don’t wanna hear no “CAC ruin the world “

Breh idk if the Illuminati is real but I believe something is causing everyone to be against each other , think about it man

great thread premise

horrible execution


i was hoping for a great discussion
 

hayesc0

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,507
Reputation
8,285
Daps
118,767
Yes it is.

Creates cheap labor and eliminates the needs for human employment like wages, medical and PTO.

And nobody really gives 2 shyts about it.

Long as you get what you get when you ordered it.
My biggest concern with it is will politicians been smart enough to get out ahead of the issue and implement ubi or will they wait long after the devastating consequences.
 

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
23,446
Reputation
5,799
Daps
81,731
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
Things change new jobs will created old ones will be eliminated.

I hope.

Problem is there usually was a grace period be it centuries or a generation. Jobs/industries will pop up and get eliminated after a couple of years in the future.

Don't assume that new jobs being created is a given.

Uber was created, gives thousands of drivers jobs. Uber plans to automate their fleet subsequently eliminating most of those jobs in the span of what...10 years?

My fear is there will either be no jobs or just perpetual gigs that people have to find, but no actual careers. No industries.

Oh you can write? Write 4-5 articles for me for my website next week.
Oh you a carpenter? Come cut a few 2x4's for me on Tuesday.
Oh you can drive stick? Come drive this truck from A to B Saturday.
I need my bathroom painted. Swing over after I get this toilet and sink installed.
You're 6'5"? Come do security at this concert Friday for me.

This will lead to permanent societal underclass.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-564
Daps
15,340
Reppin
WestMidWest
Most aint talking because it's a combo of ignorance and cowardice...folks rather go along to get along with the "inevitable" rather than seem like the oddball questioning the negative effects on a society if a human is not able to earn a living

bubu pick your occupation OR adapt ...it's bullshyt to claim that automation and the recent advancements are similar to the past because unlike the past, the effects aren't bounded by an industry or an occupation...robots are learning to do surgery, let alone stocking boxes and computer programming. No one will be safe or off limits...maybe politicians

People often have an inability to see their own mortality let alone the elimination of their industry.

Most of us are accustomed to having not seen industries completely wiped out. The jobs that make up the majority of the economy in the U.S. and the world:
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
  • Admin/Clerical
  • Truck Driving
Can be automated relatively easily with the current technology. The issues really only holding it back right now are the logistics and the legislation of that automation.

My position is this, productivity is inevitable and apart of the human condition, people are impatient and do not want to wait, and they want it as accurate as possible, but the pace of productivity coming is unlike anything we have ever seen before and at a pace that we have never seen before.

I'm not someone who like to create laws upon laws upon laws, but we don't have any real idea what this automation means for society...forget the economy. And for that reason, we should probably slow automation of any and everything down until we understand what that means for the economy and society. But I already know this won't happen.

So my next question is, what happens when there isn't gainful employment? People get purpose and meaning from their work. Sure, most of us don't like to do work, or would be working on more creative endeavors but the aim seems to be automate creativity as well.

It does not look good if automation eliminates 90% of jobs.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely...
:salute:
Same with automation, unless societies agree to limit the impact technology has on human's job security, then unemployment, public service dependency, and various social ills and isms will increase

Recall the the positive reaction and plans on buying stocks in that pepsi thread, when they announced plans for increasing automation...celebrate your long term hardship brehs

Climate change,
animal preservation efforts,
human rights,
DNA splicing,
cross species mating,
country borders
currency
...are a few examples to show that global and industry agreements or unified efforts, are possible. So demanding the same agreement towards a limited use of technology to protect humans isn't far-fetched
 

HellRell804

Banned
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,327
Reputation
2,745
Daps
22,902
Reppin
NULL
It can go one of 2 ways

1 we roll over and let it happen, take a few pennies from the government to keep us content, and sit around continuing to get fat and lazy gorging on media while the corporations continue to ruin the earth unimpeded.

Or

2 people take advantage of the free time to learn skills and knowledge that were thought lost to time. Begin growing our own food, fixing our own vehicles, and other things we look down on now and outsource to corporations. This resets the economy and provides a better scale where services are provided by the people in your neighborhood without having to go through corporations. Local farmers, local plumbers, local carpenters, local clothes etc.

I think option 1 will be the choice of major cities and 2 will be the choice of rural areas.

As the corporations work to lock down the cities, internet, news, and social media will be heavily censored to make the areas that don't submit look bad and to keep people from the cities ignorant to what's going on outside the city limits.

The corporate cities will probably launch a false flag to declare war on the other areas. Civil war 2 pops off and the damage slides the once great united states into 3rd world status.
 
Top