Who would you save- your pet or a stranger?

[LordLyons]

I'd save any of my dogs over some random. nikkas out here getting shot, robbed, sued, and everything else for trying to help other people out. My dogs been down since day 1 and they got heart of anyone walk up on me funny

If push comes to shove, your dog that is down for you so much will EAT you

 

[Knowledge]

If push comes to shove, your dog that is down for you so much will EAT you

If push comes to shove some stranger would bash my head in too

 

[GoAggieGo.]

Saving the stranger.

I’ll have my family and I another pet by the end of the day.

 

[PortCityProphet]

If you say stranger over your pet, you shouldn't have a pet

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

stranger.
debating the value of pet life over a human life....then later complaining/crying about
-why human police are quick to kill humans
-why gangbanging humans are too reckless
-why imprisoned humans living conditions should be improved because they're humans, not animals
-why humans crossing the border should get citizenship because it's a humanitarian crisis

this why you need to know the type of person before judging/capeing for them based on their politics, religion,gender,sexuality etc (the dangers of identity politics)

 

[Ineedmoney504]

Saving my pet over a non black. Sorry

 

[unit321]

Saw this on another forum and want more discussion

I voted pet.

Let's say there's a river, and it is ending at a deep drop.

No, no, no... I'm talking "you gone die" real deep.

I have a long stick with a hook. A stranger is on a raft and my pet is on a different raft. Both are floating downstream real fast and I am in between them where I can only hook one of the rafts. The other one is too far away and moving too fast to catch at the same time.



You might be thinking to yourself... "Oh, well a dog is a man's best friend"



... my pet is a guinea pig.

 

[AllHolosEve]

@Moody to real everybody is making this decision purely based on themselves, not just @CharlieManson. There's not automatic something wrong with people cause they'd pick an animal over another human, that's shyt made up. Do you realize there's groups of people that move to nature on some fukk humans shyt & live fine off the land? You putting your beliefs over another person just the same pushing some animal pecking order shyt. Caring about an animal you raised, trained, fed, has protected your family more than some mothafukka you never met just because they human ain't crazy & it ain't just white shyt like some brehs act. We got people in the hood would kill over they dogs. I just say dogs cause that's my main people, we only keep dogs.

 

[the cac mamba]

do other people see me make the choice

who knows, that stranger could be a complete piece of shyt cant fault someone for choosing their pet

 

[Moody]

@Moody to real everybody is making this decision purely based on themselves, not just @CharlieManson. There's not automatic something wrong with people cause they'd pick an animal over another human, that's shyt made up. Do you realize there's groups of people that move to nature on some fukk humans shyt & live fine off the land? You putting your beliefs over another person just the same pushing some animal pecking order shyt. Caring about an animal you raised, trained, fed, has protected your family more than some mothafukka you never met just because they human ain't crazy & it ain't just white shyt like some brehs act. We got people in the hood would kill over they dogs. I just say dogs cause that's my main people, we only keep dogs.

I wholeheartedly disagree and that's why I raised the point of another animal and not your own. The counter was "well you would save your own family member" not realizing that's a false equivalency. The absolute best way to measure this is to keep it utterly neutral first. Say you had to choose between your neighbour and your neighbour's dog. Both of whom you are not at all familiar with. Who on earth would choose the dog there? That's the essential human pecking order created within you so why would your own animal suddenly circumvent that? Simply because it's YOUR animal? That's enough to throw away the decision making you'd make on a purely connective basis? The animal's entire value at that point is higher than a human when the exact breed next door is severely below and that's a ridiculous conflict. You can't do this experiment with humans because they're starting point is identical: they're both human! So naturally at that point you'd want to seek reasons for who you would save and their connection to you becomes a valid qualifier.

Nah I aint with this saving the pet fukk shyt. It's illogical nonsense based purely on narcissistic appraisal of lives. At least charliemanson is fair and seems to be inclined to save the animal every single time regardless of who the human is.

 

[Betty Draper]

My pet, I’m sorry but I love my dog lol.

 

[Sccit]

You know how many cacs place waaaay more value in animals lives than Blacks?

CACS FUCC THEIR BROTHERS N SISTERS, U GUNA DO THAT TOO?

 

[Billy Ocean]

CACS FUCC THEIR BROTHERS N SISTERS, U GUNA DO THAT TOO?

You dumb as a brick, cac. I was pointing out that breh wasn't wrong for saying he would save his pet life over a cac because most cacs, such as yourself, don't even put any value in Black people's lives.

 

[Sccit]

You dumb as a brick, cac. I was pointing out that breh wasn't wrong for saying he would save his pet life over a cac because most cacs, such as yourself, don't even put any value in Black people's lives.

1.IM NOT YOUR FATHER, WHITEBOY AND 2.I VALUE THE LIVES OF ALL PEOPLE WIT GOOD SOULS EQUALLY

 

[AllHolosEve]

I wholeheartedly disagree and that's why I raised the point of another animal and not your own. The counter was "well you would save your own family member" not realizing that's a false equivalency. The absolute best way to measure this is to keep it utterly neutral first. Say you had to choose between your neighbour and your neighbour's dog. Both of whom you are not at all familiar with. Who on earth would choose the dog there? That's the essential human pecking order created within you so why would your own animal suddenly circumvent that? Simply because it's YOUR animal? That's enough to throw away the decision making you'd make on a purely connective basis? The animal's entire value at that point is higher than a human when the exact breed next door is severely below and that's a ridiculous conflict. You can't do this experiment with humans because they're starting point is identical: they're both human! So naturally at that point you'd want to seek reasons for who you would save and their connection to you becomes a valid qualifier.

Nah I aint with this saving the pet fukk shyt. It's illogical nonsense based purely on narcissistic appraisal of lives. At least charliemanson is fair and seems to be inclined to save the animal every single time regardless of who the human is.

Bullshyt. The entire point is "It's Your Animal" & you're changing the question: "Your Neighbors Pet or a Neighbor?" I don't have a bond with my neighbors dog so the point your making is irrelevant to the question. Your utterly neautral stance is not the question asked, this IS NOT a neutral question, it's an emotional one. This is not a pet you aren't familiar with, people are making up shyt.

I agree @CharlieManson made valid points & I agree with the logic for the most part. But I just disagree with you totally.

If it was YOUR mom or a stranger MOM, same shyt, we gonna pick the one who we got a bond with.

I study psychology & instead of just answering the initial question you added shyt to it that isn't relevant at all to make your point.

Again: "Your pet" vs "A stranger" leave all the additives out & just answer the fukking question.