As a rookie, leading everybody in a playoff game with a game high 26 points while getting 10 rebounds but no, he's not a catalyst :ohword:
26 points on 26 shots. Scoring the majority of his points, posting up a 6 ft 2 PG, because the Spurs were willing to live with him getting off shots, rather than Curry or Klay. You put MKG on that team and he would be capable of the same impact, if not more.
He IS a catalyst whether your contrarian logic likes it or not. He can create his own shot, he is aggressive, and he's a balanced player. Downside? He overshoots sometimes and he's not the brighest, but so what? He's a rookie.
A catalyst in what though? You're acting as if he's some great offensive threat. HE'S STILL A COMPLIMENTARY PLAYER. He was the fourth option all year long in the starting lineup and that was only because there was a revolving door at the 5. If Bogut was healthy the entire season, Barnes would've be relegated to being the last option in the starting lineup.
The fact he's a third/fourth option on the Warriors is a testament to their depth NOT because Barnes is bad option.
If he was on the Bobcats he'd have way more of an impact than MKG let be real here
:nikkawhat:
When did I say he was a bad option?
Nah, he wouldn't have more impact. I watched them both this season, and the only area that Barnes would trump him in is stretching the floor (shooting and at a minor - scoring). Passing, crashing the boards, shutting down perimeter players, in transition, playing the passing lanes, help defense, slashing, tying up loose ends on both sides of the court - MKG had more of an impact.