Barnes is a complementary player until proven otherwise. What are you saying exactly, that Barnes could be a star on another team if he was the
#1 /#2 option?
Barnes still
has trouble creating in the halfcourt,
trouble handling the ball, trouble making the right decision(s), trouble with rotating on defense, trouble with being assertive/aggressive etc etc. His skillset doesn't warrant any more of a role, than where he's currently at now.
He isn't as bad as advertised in college, but he isn't capable of creating for himself 'skillfully'.
His way of playing is dynamic, what kind of vague bullshyt is that? MKG's ceiling is difficult to gauge, because if he doesn't fix his shooting mechanics there won't be much room for him to grow; if he does, along the same lines as
Wall, then he will have the higher ceiling out of the two. He practically does everything else better than Barnes.
At this stage, there's really no significant difference between the two, where one is definitively better than the other. Barnes has been fortunate because he's been in a winning culture since the start of the season and MKG the total opposite. Far too early to tell who's gonna have the better career.
You're a cornball.